Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Players Marks: Charlton v Stevenage. (closes Tuesday teatime)

13»

Comments

  • Options
    edited April 2
    Jscore: 5 - Not much you can do with such a lack of creativity going forwards in midfield and from RWB. It felt like we were attacking  3 v 7 every time we went forwards, expecially in the 1st half.

    ISTED: 7 - Some good saves to keep us a clean sheet
    R.E.G.: 7 - Solid and comfortable
    HECTOR: 8.5 - MOM - Charlton weren't great, but Hector was superb defensively. A great game
    THOMAS: 6.5 - Defensively sound, fair few misplaced hoofs on outlet
    T.WATSON: 4.5 - So timid and never wants to overlap or play a forward pass. Limits us going forwards given the system is set up for wing-backs
    COVENTRY: 6 - Fine. Some good interplay to create openings which were then wasted by a lack of numbers ahead of him
    DOBSON: 6 - Important defensively, but lacking in creativity and output going forwards.
    MAY: 5.5 - Pretty anonymous. But when your big men don't hold the ball up for you to get onto, you would be...
    SMALL: 5.5 - Ok, but not his best
    KANU: 5 - Nothing really stuck, but didn't get great service
    LADAPO:  4 - Nothing stuck at all
    ANEKE: 5 - Poor service, used his strength well with a lenient ref, but then went to ground and expected the ref to give something which was naive

    Referee: 7 - I like a ref who ignores going to ground as being an immediate foul. Got a couple wrong, but I think this actually was good for the most part. The foul against and booking for Watson was a joke though.

    BAKINSON: n/a - Ok. Goal would his first touch would have been handy
    NESS: n/a - Not sure he won a header
  • Options
    Jscore: 5
    ISTED: 6.5
    R.E.G.:5 
    HECTOR: 7
    THOMAS:6 
    T.WATSON: 5
    COVENTRY: 5.5
    DOBSON: 5
    MAY: 4
    SMALL: 6.5
    KANU:5 
    LADAPO: 4
    ANEKE: 5.5
    Referee: 3
  • Options
    Jscore: 5
    ISTED: 6.5
    R.E.G.: 5
    HECTOR: 7
    THOMAS: 5
    T.WASTON: 5
    COVENTRY: 5
    DOBSON: 5
    MAY: 4.5
    SMALL: 5
    KANU: 5.5
    LADAPO: 4
    ANEKE: 5
    Referee:4
  • Options
    Jscore: 5
    ISTED: 5
    R.E.G.: 5
    HECTOR: 6.5
    THOMAS: 6
    T.WATSON: 5
    COVENTRY: 5
    DOBSON: 5
    MAY: 5
    SMALL: 
    KANU: 5.5
    LADAPO: 4
    ANEKE: 5
    Referee: 3
  • Options
    Jscore: 7
    ISTED: 7
    R.E.G.: 6
    HECTOR: 8
    THOMAS: 6
    T.WATSON: 5
    COVENTRY: 6
    DOBSON: 6
    MAY: 5
    SMALL: 5
    KANU: 7
    LADAPO: 3
    ANEKE: 6
    Referee: 3
    BAKINSON: n/a
    NESS: n/a
  • Options
    Jscore: 6.5
    ISTED: 4.5
    R.E.G.: 6
    HECTOR: 8
    THOMAS: 6.5
    T.WATSON: 6
    COVENTRY: 6.5
    DOBSON: 7
    MAY: 6
    SMALL: 6.5
    KANU: 6.5
    LADAPO: 4.5
    ANEKE: 6.5
    Referee: 5.5
  • Options
    Jscore: 5
    ISTED: 7
    R.E.G.: 7
    HECTOR: 7
    THOMAS: 6.5
    T.WATSON: 6.5
    COVENTRY: 5
    DOBSON: 5
    MAY: 5
    SMALL: 4
    KANU: 6.5
    LADAPO: 4
    ANEKE: 4
    Referee: 4.5
  • Options
    At the game:

    Jscore: 6 Has made us hard to beat, but line up was lacking any creativity. Hoping subbing Alfie was precaution rather than tactical, otherwise why take off your hardest working player and league top scorer?

    ISTED: 7 Couple of good saves. Fairly solid, but needs to communicate better with defence. There was at least one cross that he should have come for rather than leaving it for a defender. 
    R.E.G.: 6 Decent.
    HECTOR: 8 Excellent game. Won most challenges and decent on the ball too.
    THOMAS: 6 Very solid defensively and won lots of headers, but passing was off all game.
    T.WATSON: 5 No product going forward. Rarely takes on his man and usually stops and passes backwards. Very frustrating player. Sean Clare mark 2, and that is not a compliment! 
    COVENTRY: 6 Bit of a nothing game. He is NOT an upgrade on Dobson.
    DOBSON: 6.5 Not a good game by his high standards, but still put in a shift and some great blocks and tackles. His passing game didn't come off at all though.
    MAY: 6 Lots of effort but never looked fully in the game.
    SMALL: 6 Our main attacking threat, but crosses were poor. Lacked support when he was double marked and so had nowhere to go.
    KANU: 7.5 Worked really hard on the scraps he was given. Battled well and good hold up play.
    LADAPO: 5 Didn't work hard, didn't battle well and hold up play was poor!
    ANEKE: 6 He definitely makes a difference, but struggled to make a huge impact. Well marked by Piergianni (who was excellent all game).

    Referee: 4 Muppet. So inconsistent.
     
    BAKINSON: n/a I thought he looked decent when he came on. Must be due a start?
    NESS: n/a Looked very rusty and struggled a bit with the aerial bombardment.
  • Options
    ISTED:  5
    R.E.G.: 5
    HECTOR: 6
    THOMAS: 4
    T.WATSON: 2
    COVENTRY: 5
    DOBSON: 4
    MAY: 5
    SMALL: 6
    KANU: 5
    LADAPO: 1
    ANEKE: 6
    Referee: 4
  • Options
    Jscore: 5.5
    ISTED: 6
    R.E.G.: 6
    HECTOR: 7.5
    THOMAS: 6
    T.WATSON: 6
    COVENTRY: 6
    DOBSON: 6
    MAY: 6
    SMALL: 6
    KANU: 6
    LADAPO: 5
    ANEKE: 5.5
    Referee: 4
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Jscore: 6
    ISTED: 7
    R.E.G.: 6
    HECTOR: 8 
    THOMAS: 6 
    T.WATSON: 6 
    COVENTRY: 6
    DOBSON: 5
    MAY: 7
    SMALL: 5
    KANU: 7.5
    LADAPO: 2
    ANEKE: 3
    Referee: 3
  • Options
    Jscore: 5 It should be obvious that May isn't a no 10. Should have started with May Kanu and Bak. Ladapo should be nowhere near this team.
    ISTED: 7 did nothing wrong but wish he would command his area more. A couple of crosses could have been dealt with.
    R.E.G.: 7 Did okay but not a lot of forward intent when he replaced watson
    HECTOR: 8 Our best player by far.
    THOMAS: 6.5 Losses marks for some dreadful passing
    T.WATSON: 6.5 Needed to get forward more. Defended okay
    COVENTRY: 6 A bit headless chicken but worked hard. Passing not great
    DOBSON: 6 Same as Coventry
    MAY: 4 A major lack of quality from Alfie. Can't think of anything he did well
    SMALL: 7.5 Got forward well despite beiling double marked a lot of the time. Crosses need to improve though.
    KANU: 6 Worked very hard but he needs more than that if he is to be a regular starter
    LADAPO: 4 Awful. Poor control, passing and movement.
    ANEKE: 5 Gave us more strength up front but didn't make an impact.
    Referee: 4 Needs to be more consistant with giving free kicks. I gues he tried to keep the game flowing though. Not that the game flowed anywhere!!
  • Options
    Jscore: 6

    ISTED: 7
    R.E.G.: 6
    HECTOR: 7
    THOMAS: 6
    T.WASTON: 5
    COVENTRY: 5
    DOBSON: 6
    MAY: 6
    SMALL: 5
    KANU: 6
    LADAPO: 4
    ANEKE: 5

    Referee: 4
  • Options
    Your marks please:

    Jscore:  5
    ISTED:  7
    R.E.G.:  5
    HECTOR:  7.5
    THOMAS:  6
    T.WATSON:  6
    COVENTRY:  5.5
    DOBSON:  5.5
    MAY:  5
    SMALL:  5.5
    KANU:  6.5
    LADAPO:  5
    ANEKE:  6
    Referee:  5
    BAKINSON: n/a
    NESS: n/a

  • Options
    Jscore:  3 got the set up badly wrong. He knows how poor this team is and it cannot play with 3 strikers at once.
    ISTED:  7
    R.E.G.:  5
    HECTOR:  6
    THOMAS:  6
    T.WATSON:  5
    COVENTRY:  5
    DOBSON:  5
    MAY:  5
    SMALL:  5
    KANU:  6
    LADAPO:  3 he can trap the ball he can not dribble with the ball and he cannot shoot.
    ANEKE: 5
  • Options
    Jscore: 5.5
    ISTED: 6
    R.E.G.: 6.5
    HECTOR: 7.5
    THOMAS: 6.5
    T.WATSON: 5
    COVENTRY: 5.5
    DOBSON: 6.5
    MAY: 6
    SMALL: 6.5
    KANU: 7
    LADAPO: 4.5
    ANEKE: 6
    Referee: 4
    BAKINSON: n/a
    NESS: n/a

Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!