Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

STATBANK: CHARLTON 2-1 BARNSLEY

lancashire ladlancashire lad
edited April 8 in General Charlton
thank you 68 Lifers for your marks









Comments

  • Options
    se9addickse9addick
    What’s the highest individual average mark ever LL? May’s 8.88 must be up there?
  • Options
    Pedro45Pedro45
    Did REG get booked four times???
  • Options
    Briston_AddickBriston_Addick
    Pedro45 said:
    Did REG get booked four times???
    That was naughty of him.
  • Options
    cafcsingercafcsinger
    Isted 6.57 and Coventry 6.79? Seems very generous to me, and supports my theory that the whole team gets marked higher when they win, regardless of how well they played individually. 
  • Options
    paulsturgesspaulsturgess
    Our spread of goals this season is truly appalling !
  • Options
    lancashire ladlancashire lad
    Pedro45 said:
    Did REG get booked four times???
    thanks,, correction made
  • Options
    killerandflashkillerandflash
    cafcsinger said:
    Isted 6.57 and Coventry 6.79? Seems very generous to me, and supports my theory that the whole team gets marked higher when they win, regardless of how well they played individually. 
    Coventry was invisible in the first half, so yes slightly generous.

    The J score of 7.84, higher than everyone except May seems slightly generous too. 
  • Options
    StigStig
    It's interesting that May is only 6th in the average scores list, yet comments on Player of the Season suggest he's the runaway winner. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    JohnnyH2JohnnyH2
    Stig said:
    It's interesting that May is only 6th in the average scores list, yet comments on Player of the Season suggest he's the runaway winner. 
    None of the players above him in that list have played enough games to be considered for POTY
  • Options
    lancashire ladlancashire lad
    Stig said:
    It's interesting that May is only 6th in the average scores list, yet comments on Player of the Season suggest he's the runaway winner. 
    you also gave to take into account  the number of games played, to just consider the average mark gives a false picture
  • Options
    killerandflashkillerandflash
    Louie Watson in 3rd in the averages is the most misleading position! I assume it's because he missed the run of awful performances which lowered everyone else's average.
  • Options
    paulsturgesspaulsturgess
    killerandflash said:
    Louie Watson in 3rd in the averages is the most misleading position! I assume it's because he missed the run of awful performances which lowered everyone else's average.
    Is that merely a coincidence…. 
  • Options
    CallumcafcCallumcafc
    edited April 8
    killerandflash said:
    Louie Watson in 3rd in the averages is the most misleading position! I assume it's because he missed the run of awful performances which lowered everyone else's average.
    If someone was a proper nerd, they could work out each player’s average score as a function of the team’s average score for each matchday and control for any of the above.

    e.g. from this weekend… Alfie 8.88 / 7.10 = 1.25, Chuks 6.56 / 7.10 = 0.92
  • Options
    MuttleyCAFCMuttleyCAFC
    killerandflash said:
    Louie Watson in 3rd in the averages is the most misleading position! I assume it's because he missed the run of awful performances which lowered everyone else's average.
    Yes, there was a long run of games where scores were low and if a player avoided those they would almost certainly have a better score. It feels right that Alfie is our player of the season.
  • Options
    ross1ross1
    Callumcafc said:
    killerandflash said:
    Louie Watson in 3rd in the averages is the most misleading position! I assume it's because he missed the run of awful performances which lowered everyone else's average.
    If someone was a proper nerd, they could work out each player’s average score as a function of the team’s average score for each matchday and control for any of the above.

    e.g. from this weekend… Alfie 8.88 / 7.10 = 1.25, Chuks 6.56 / 7.10 = 0.92
    Over to you Callumcafc, only fair as it is your good idea 😂
  • Options
    redmanredman
    ross1 said:
    Callumcafc said:
    killerandflash said:
    Louie Watson in 3rd in the averages is the most misleading position! I assume it's because he missed the run of awful performances which lowered everyone else's average.
    If someone was a proper nerd, they could work out each player’s average score as a function of the team’s average score for each matchday and control for any of the above.

    e.g. from this weekend… Alfie 8.88 / 7.10 = 1.25, Chuks 6.56 / 7.10 = 0.92
    Over to you Callumcafc, only fair as it is your good idea 😂
    I actually don't think it means much tbh. most of us give better marks when we win, which is usually as a result of us playing better. The individua; players playing that day DO make a difference! 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!