It goes without saying we are, as a club, under-performing massively at the moment, and have been for some years.
A few years back I worked out that our average league position would have us ranked about 30th (so around mid table in the Championship), and we are of course a league below that.
I did a Google search this morning for ‘the EFL’s most under performing clubs’, but perhaps surprisingly, nothing much showed up. According to AI, ‘There isn't much info about which EFL clubs are underperforming right now, but here's some related information about the English Football League (EFL):’
However, I did stumble upon this Reddit article, which ranks clubs in terms of league position and ‘prestige’.
I’ve only skim read it, but the outcome is that it ranks Charlton in 38th position, which isn’t too far off the ranking I came up with in 2016.
Comments
Personally, I was a lot more comfortable thinking about this sort of thing around 2006 than I am now.
There’s so much wrong with this.
How the hell are they measuring prestige?
Edit: to answer my own question here are two rules that I disagree with (taken from the Reddit link):
-only league data is taken into account, since adding cup results probably would've been a little too complicated - and the league data took me a month already!
This is nuts if only because Liverpool have won the European Cup six times and the UEFA Cup 3 times.
Definitely controversial, at least. Everton have been making up the numbers for 30 years during which time Chelsea have been champions on five occasions.
There are so many examples of how this measurement of ’prestige’ is wrong.
Premier League:
Drops to 11th?
Will amend though. Thanks! 👍
Why do it from 1888 though I thought that serious football only started in 1995!!
As I see it this link brings the figures up to 2024, but only shows the top 10. Is there anyway of seeing the whole list?
And JamesSeed have you thought about updating your original work
https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/18267630/