Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Deadline Day from Pg.641 - Summer 2025 Charlton Athletic Transfer Rumours

1648649650652654

Comments

  • NabySarr said:
    NabySarr said:
    mendonca said:
    I don’t think Bree has featured for Southampton at all this season. He wasn't named on the bench for the League Cup games either by the looks of it.
    He picked up an injury in pre-season, should be back fit this month  
    Which is why I'd prefer Ward who, according to reports, has played 3 league games this season.

    Havent we learnt from the past.  This season it's been Knibbs, Kelman & Burke who haven't been match fit. Last season Godden didn't start the season as he wasnt fit. And we can go back to Ben Reeves too.


    We don’t desperately need this signing to go straight into the team, so I’d rather the better player than the player that’s fit. 

    Bree is miles better than Ward, I’d much rather have 7 months of Bree this season, than 8 months of Ward 
    Other cheeses are available 
  • NabySarr said:
    NabySarr said:
    mendonca said:
    I don’t think Bree has featured for Southampton at all this season. He wasn't named on the bench for the League Cup games either by the looks of it.
    He picked up an injury in pre-season, should be back fit this month  
    Which is why I'd prefer Ward who, according to reports, has played 3 league games this season.

    Havent we learnt from the past.  This season it's been Knibbs, Kelman & Burke who haven't been match fit. Last season Godden didn't start the season as he wasnt fit. And we can go back to Ben Reeves too.


    We don’t desperately need this signing to go straight into the team, so I’d rather the better player than the player that’s fit. 

    Bree is miles better than Ward, I’d much rather have 7 months of Bree this season, than 8 months of Ward 
    Other cheeses are available 
    Prove it
  • Fofana going to Preston instead makes sense seeing we have so many strikers, they can guarantee more minutes 

    Especially it's nearer to the National Railway Museum. 
  • Has anyone seen Bree-Willy?
  • .
    We need to Cram Berry into the team now to compliment Bree. 

    Perhaps Paul Bacon as player coach to complete the midfield?
  • Has anyone seen Bree-Willy?
    Oh no. Not cheesy willy puns.
  • 300+ posts, nothin' sorted yet, and all we are ending up with is some cheesy guy called Bree...or have I missed something...🤷‍♂️
  • Sponsored links:


  • 300+ posts, nothin' sorted yet, and all we are ending up with is some cheesy guy called Bree...or have I missed something...🤷‍♂️
    Hearing that Ramsay could end up becoming Guehi's replacement... 500k

  • fenaddick said:
    I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet. 
    agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceive
    You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?
    according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker ..  read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is needed
    Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the net 
    get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as  well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1
    Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture. 

    BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it

    Except it won't. I'm certain at no point, we will see a league game this season where Gillesphey, Z Mitchell, and Hobden all start together in defence. It's completely different scenario if say only Gillesphey has to come in to the starting 11.
  • MrBurns said:
    Shocking if we only get the one in
    Why they been saying that’s all was coming in for a few weeks … 
  • fenaddick said:
    I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet. 
    agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceive
    You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?
    according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker ..  read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is needed
    Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the net 
    get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as  well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1
    Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture. 

    BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I do

    We’d have to be very unlucky for Hobden, Laqeretabua, Mitchell and Fullah to be part of our back five in the same league game. Especially if Bree joins today too.
  • MrBurns said:
    Shocking if we only get the one in
    Why they been saying that’s all was coming in for a few weeks … 
    Yep the guy from Walsall you have been promising the last week or so.
  • edited 3:05PM
    fenaddick said:
    I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet. 
    agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceive
    You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?
    according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker ..  read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is needed
    Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the net 
    get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as  well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1
    Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture. 

    BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I do

    Oh I "get it" now. 
    All of our back five get injured in one game. 
    You're right that would be a concern 🙄
  • Sponsored links:


  • 3 hours to go. Come on Charlton let's get a couple in.
  • Uboat said:
    Uboat said:
    Just typed out a 6/10 cheese pun, but decided to delete instead of posting.  Quite proud of myself. 
    It was probably for the grater good.
    Holy shit. That was the pun! No joke, that was 100% the shit joke I decided not to post. 
    You're obviously a wise person. Your 'Holy shit' comment got more LOLs than my 'grater good' joke. 
  • Can we all be mature and allow this story to breeze past us.
  • 300+ posts, nothin' sorted yet, and all we are ending up with is some cheesy guy called Bree...or have I missed something...🤷‍♂️
    I think you've managed to precis it well.
  • eastterrace6168 said:load of rubbish 

    300+ posts, nothin' sorted yet, and all we are ending up with is some cheesy guy called Bree...or have I missed something...🤷‍♂️
    Hearing that Ramsay could end up becoming Guehi's replacement... 500k


  • If you're suggesting Ronnie that Ramsay to Palace for 500k is a load of rubbish... Well... I take offence at that!!
  • If you're suggesting Ronnie that Ramsay to Palace for 500k is a load of rubbish... Well... I take offence at that!!
    Pot and kettle springs to mind 😉
  • Now to improve our attack xG please.
  • fenaddick said:
    I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet. 
    agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceive
    You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?
    according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker ..  read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is needed
    Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the net 
    get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as  well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1
    Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture. 

    BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I do

    Oh I "get it" now. 
    All of our back five get injured in one game. 
    You're right that would be a concern 🙄
    sarcastic dickhead lol .. you can surely do better than that, or can't you ?
  • Bree ? .. yet another refugee from Nathan's Saints/Luton days .. are there no other defenders available ?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!