I don’t think Bree has featured for Southampton at all this season. He wasn't named on the bench for the League Cup games either by the looks of it.
He picked up an injury in pre-season, should be back fit this month
Which is why I'd prefer Ward who, according to reports, has played 3 league games this season.
Havent we learnt from the past. This season it's been Knibbs, Kelman & Burke who haven't been match fit. Last season Godden didn't start the season as he wasnt fit. And we can go back to Ben Reeves too.
We don’t desperately need this signing to go straight into the team, so I’d rather the better player than the player that’s fit.
Bree is miles better than Ward, I’d much rather have 7 months of Bree this season, than 8 months of Ward
I don’t think Bree has featured for Southampton at all this season. He wasn't named on the bench for the League Cup games either by the looks of it.
He picked up an injury in pre-season, should be back fit this month
Which is why I'd prefer Ward who, according to reports, has played 3 league games this season.
Havent we learnt from the past. This season it's been Knibbs, Kelman & Burke who haven't been match fit. Last season Godden didn't start the season as he wasnt fit. And we can go back to Ben Reeves too.
We don’t desperately need this signing to go straight into the team, so I’d rather the better player than the player that’s fit.
Bree is miles better than Ward, I’d much rather have 7 months of Bree this season, than 8 months of Ward
I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceive
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is needed
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the net
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I do
I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceive
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is needed
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the net
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it
Except it won't. I'm certain at no point, we will see a league game this season where Gillesphey, Z Mitchell, and Hobden all start together in defence. It's completely different scenario if say only Gillesphey has to come in to the starting 11.
I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceive
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is needed
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the net
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I do
We’d have to be very unlucky for Hobden, Laqeretabua, Mitchell and Fullah to be part of our back five in the same league game. Especially if Bree joins today too.
I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceive
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is needed
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the net
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I do
Oh I "get it" now. All of our back five get injured in one game. You're right that would be a concern 🙄
I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceive
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is needed
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the net
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I do
Oh I "get it" now. All of our back five get injured in one game. You're right that would be a concern 🙄
sarcastic dickhead lol .. you can surely do better than that, or can't you ?
Comments
Especially it's nearer to the National Railway Museum.
Perhaps Paul Bacon as player coach to complete the midfield?
All of our back five get injured in one game.
You're right that would be a concern 🙄