Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Seth Plum
Starinnaddick
Posts: 4,345
Was he banned because he tended to politicise most threads or was there something else?
He joined the forum in 2008 and was mostly controversial but you need differing views to generate healthy debate.
He joined the forum in 2008 and was mostly controversial but you need differing views to generate healthy debate.
5
Comments
-
Who?2
-
Free the Lewisham (or was it Lee?) one!2
-
Is he banned? If do why on earth?1
-
No you don't.Starinnaddick said:Was he banned because he tended to politicise most threads or was there something else?
He joined the forum in 2008 and was mostly controversial but you need differing views to generate healthy debate.11 -
Not a kindred spirit of mine politically or at the dining table but a good man in the flesh and different opinions make the world go round in a free society.
Cannot understand this banning of a longtime poster.10 -
Lee I believe.SantaClaus said:Free the Lewisham (or was it Lee?) one!0 -
OK let's all agree to agree. LolMajor said:
No you don't.Starinnaddick said:Was he banned because he tended to politicise most threads or was there something else?
He joined the forum in 2008 and was mostly controversial but you need differing views to generate healthy debate.0 -
I'm sure this thread will not last long. I wasn't involved but there was a dispute between Seth and another poster where Seth reacted, as he often does when challenged, quite aggressively. In this instance though he really did cross a line or two and the thread had to be pulled and substantially reedited. I assume this led to his ban.Starinnaddick said:Was he banned because he tended to politicise most threads or was there something else?
He joined the forum in 2008 and was mostly controversial but you need differing views to generate healthy debate.2 -
Thank you.Alwaysneil said:
I'm sure this thread will not last long. I wasn't involved but there was a dispute between Seth and another poster where Seth reacted, as he often does when challenged, quite aggressively. In this instance though he really did cross a line or two and the thread had to be pulled and substantially reedited. I assume this led to his ban.Starinnaddick said:Was he banned because he tended to politicise most threads or was there something else?
He joined the forum in 2008 and was mostly controversial but you need differing views to generate healthy debate.1 -
Has attacked me plenty of times but I wouldn't want him banned3
- Sponsored links:
-
He had 8 promotes so must have done something good1
-
Just as well you're not a regular poster then.Major said:
No you don't.Starinnaddick said:Was he banned because he tended to politicise most threads or was there something else?
He joined the forum in 2008 and was mostly controversial but you need differing views to generate healthy debate.2 -
Seth inhabited his nom de plume perfectly, ie; Plum.
I also do this as 99.9% of the bilge I concoct on here is Soapy and nonsense...
I miss him.3 -
0
-
Think the Major is pulling your leg there mate lolStarinnaddick said:
OK let's all agree to agree. LolMajor said:
No you don't.Starinnaddick said:Was he banned because he tended to politicise most threads or was there something else?
He joined the forum in 2008 and was mostly controversial but you need differing views to generate healthy debate.1 -
I can assure the mod team don’t ban users lightly or on a whim. Everything gets discussed and agreed and long time posters generally get given multiple instances before an action is taken (that’s not really what anyone wants to do). Thats what’s happened here. Unwanted, but in this case necessary. It’s never helpful to discuss moderating actions openly (mainly because one party is no longer able to engage), nor is it helpful having multiple posts discussing actions that have been taken, so if anyone wants to discuss privately please reach out to one of the moderators. Cheers all20
This discussion has been closed.
