Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Leyton Orient 1-0 Charlton

2»

Comments

  • harveys_gardener
    harveys_gardener Posts: 7,038

    Sullivan 6.5
    Solly 6.5
    Morrison 6.5
    Taylor 6
    Wiggins 7.5 MOM
    Hollands 6.5
    Russell 6
    Jackson 5.5
    Kermorgant 7
    Wright Phillips 6.5
    Pritchard 7.5
  • RugbyAddick
    RugbyAddick Posts: 2,084
    Sullivan 6.5 I felt for him. Did well considering the circumstances. He had no chance with goal.
    Solly 8 MOTM
    Morrison 6
    Taylor 6
    Wiggins 8
    Hollands 6
    Russell 6
    Jackson 6
    Kermorgant 5.5 Flicks led to nowhere as BWP was nowhere.
    Wright Phillips 4.5 - Head down too much.
    Pritchard 7.5 Start him.

    Hayes n/a
  • stilladdicted
    stilladdicted Posts: 4,307
    edited January 2012
    Sullivan - 6
    Solly - 7
    Morrison - 6.5
    Taylor - 6
    Wiggins - 7.5
    Hollands - 6.5
    Russell - 6.5
    Jackson - 6
    Kermorgant - 7
    Wright Phillips - 5.5
    Pritchard - 7
  • Macronate
    Macronate Posts: 12,914

    sullivan 6.5

    solly 8

    Morrison 6

    Taylor 6.5

    Wiggins 8

    Hollands 6.5

    Russell 6

    Jackson 6.5

    Kermorgant 6.5

    BWP 6

    Pritchard 7

  • DartfordAddick
    DartfordAddick Posts: 1,085
    Sullivan - 6 Solly - 7Morrison - 5Taylor -5Wiggins - 7 Hollands - 6 Russell - 5Jackson - 6Kermorgant - 7 Wright Phillips - 5 Pritchard - 7.5 
  • Brighton Addick
    Brighton Addick Posts: 207
    Sullivan 6 Some dodgy moments but can't have been easy coming on in those circumstances
    Solly 8 excellent MoM.  With Waggy taken off he looked after that whole right side by himself
    Morrison 7 Had a lot of work to get through via out overrun midfield and did most of it well
    Taylor 7 as Morrison
    Wiggins 7.5 So much energy.  Premiership bound.
    Hollands 6.5 tough game as totally outnumbered
    Russell 6 time of Hughes to be given another go
    Jackson 6.5 great to have him back - will get better with more games
    Kermorgant 6.5 A quiet game for him, but still good
    Wright Phillips 6 Hard for him with no service.  A goal will open the flood gates.
    Pritchard 7 Like the look of this lad.  Lots of energy and is clearly loving every second.
  • Redmidland
    Redmidland Posts: 44,700
    Watched on TV-:
    Sullivan -5
    Solly - 7
    Morrison - 6
    Taylor - 6
    Wiggins - 7
    Hollands - 6
    Russell - 5
    Jackson - 5
    Kermorgant - 6
    Wright Phillips - 5
    Pritchard - 7


  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,081
    Sullivan 6
    Solly 7.5 MOM
    Morrison 6
    Taylor 6
    Wiggins 7
    Hollands 6.5
    Russell 6
    Jackson 6
    Kermorgant 6
    Wright Phillips 6
    Pritchard 7
  • rufusisadogsname
    rufusisadogsname Posts: 862
    Hamer - 2
    Sullivan - 4
    Solly - 7.5 - MOM
    Morrison - 6
    Taylor - 6
    Wiggins - 7
    Hollands - 6
    Russell - 6.5
    Jackson - 5.5
    Kermorgant - 6.5
    Wright Phillips - 5
    Pritchard - 6
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,229

    Sullivan 5.5
    Solly 7.5
    Morrison 5.5
    Taylor 6
    Wiggins 7
    Hollands 6
    Russell 5.5
    Jackson 5.5
    Kermorgant 8
    Wright Phillips 5
    Pritchard 6

  • Sponsored links:



  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,235
    Sullivan 6.5 - Looked nervous, but then you would be coming on for your first appearance of the season with only 5 minutes gone. Great save from Mooney and successful in the air

    Solly 7 - Quiet first half but showed brilliant spirit in the second half and pushed forward well towards the end.

    Morrison 6 - Strangely shaky, not impressive for their goal

    Taylor 6 - Looked very slow and tired, but still solid enough

    Wiggins 7 - Defended and attacked well, unlucky with shot cleared off the line

    Hollands 6 - Didn't impose himself defensively but passed well

    Russell 7.5 MOTM - Defended with crunching tackles and seemed the only player who realised that just tonking the ball up doesn't work with 10 men. He charged forward and laid it off brilliantly

    Jackson 5 - Looked like he would start well but his participation was killed by the sending off. Just back from injury he didn't have the legs for the fight

    Kermorgant 7 - Great range of passing and good ideas but struggled to create with 10 men on the pitch

    Wright Phillips 6 - Chased but harrying is not his strength. Giving him that role was a mistake from Powell

    Pritchard 7 - Excellent cameo, should be been brought on earlier
  • RedArmySE7
    RedArmySE7 Posts: 5,407
    Sullivan - 6.5

    Solly - 8

    Morrison - 6

    Taylor - 6

    Wiggins - 8

    Hollands - 6

    Russell - 7

    Jackson - 6

    Kermorgant - 7.5

    Wright Phillips - 5

    Pritchard - 6
  • C_A_F_C
    C_A_F_C Posts: 3,868
    edited January 2012

     

    Sullivan - 6

    Solly - 7

    Morrison - 6

    Taylor - 6

    Wiggins - 7

    Hollands - 6

    Russell - 7

    Jackson - 6

    Kermorgant - 6

    Wright Phillips - 5

    Pritchard - 7

     

  • BDL
    BDL Posts: 6,004
    Sullivan 6
    Solly 7
    Morrison 6
    Taylor 6
    Wiggins 7
    Hollands 7
    Russell 6
    Jackson 6
    Kermorgant 7.5
    Wright Phillips 5
    Pritchard 7
  • Addickted4life
    Addickted4life Posts: 7,467
    Sullivan - 6 - Struggled on crosses/Corners but made a fantastic save to keep us in the match

    Solly - 6.5 - Left exposed down the right as Waggy had been taken off and Cook and Mcsweeny were all over him in the first half but he plugged away and improved in the 2nd.

    Morrison - 6 - not quite up to scratch

    Taylor - 6 - see above

    Wiggins - 8 - Our best player on the pitch - MOTM

    Hollands - 6 - game seemed to pass him by

    Russel - 6.5 - got forward quite a few times 

    Jackson - 6 - Getting back to full fitness so not at his best

    Kermorgant - 6 - didn't see much of the ball

    Wright - Phillips - 6 - see above

    Pritchard - 7 - added a bit of pace and was one of our most attacking players when he came on.  

  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,296
    Think there are circumstances the "rules" ought to be changed. If a sub doesnt play 15 mins thats fine, if he's injured fine but if he makes a mistake costs us the game surely we should mark him Most players averages will fall after this game but Hamers doesnt. YET QUITE SIMPLY HE COST US THE GAME
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,296
    hamer 0
    Sullivan 6
    Solly 7.5 MOM
    Morrison 6
    Taylor 6.5
    Wiggins 7
    Hollands 6.5
    Russell 7.5
    Jackson 6.5
    Kermorgant 6
    Wright Phillips 6
    Pritchard 8
  • Nozza2310
    Nozza2310 Posts: 210
    Sullivan - 6
    Solly - 8
    Morrison - 6
    Taylor - 6
    Wiggins - 8
    Hollands - 6
    Russell - 7
    Jackson - 6
    Kermorgant - 6.5
    Wright Phillips - 6
    Pritchard - 7

  • Mortimerician
    Mortimerician Posts: 5,222
    Sullivan 5 - What is it with our keepers and charging out hopelessly/flapping at crosses
    Solly  6.5- Good job, but could have got forward more.
    Morrison 5 - Stretched out and exposed by the talents of Lisbie and Mooney
    Taylor 5.5 A threat in attack, but looked pedestrian
    Wiggins 7 A cut above the rest
    Hollands 6 Sadly missing
    Russell 5 Even more missing
    Jackson 6 Looked OK inside, but didn't get a hold of the game.
    Kermorgant 6 Tried hard, but flicks didn't land today.
    Wright Phillips 5 When he doesn't fire, we don't fire.
    Pritchard 6 Did OK.

    Hamer's shenanigans finally cost us some points today, if I could score him it'd be a duck egg because he's cost us important points, although he wasn't helped by his colleagues lack of response.
  • RugbyAddick
    RugbyAddick Posts: 2,084
    I thought that to get a mark you need to play a minimum of 30 minutes (injury time included).

  • Sponsored links:



  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,120
    Sullivan 6
    Solly 8
    Morrison 6
    Taylor 6
    Wiggins 8
    Hollands 6
    Russell 6
    Jackson 6
    Kermorgant 7
    Wright Phillips 6
    Pritchard 7
  • danny777
    danny777 Posts: 222
    Sullivan   5 Couple of good saves; too much flapping
    Solly       7
    Morrison  4 Lucky with the "offside" goal that was disallowed, and that Mooney and Lisbie couldn't shoot straight
    Taylor      4 As for Morrison. Orient created space for too many chances
    Wiggins   6  Extra marks for his goalline clearance at one end and shot cleared off the line at the other. Needs to work on his right foot
    Hollands  5
    Russell    5
    Jackson   5 Not his fault that it was his first game back after injury. Should have been subbed earlier
    Kermorgant  5
    Wright Phillips  5
    Pritchard   6  

    Hayes n/a
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
    I know he wasn't on the pitch long enough but surely hamer should get a mark ... His sending off had a massive impact on the game
    no the system we use requires a player to be on the pitch for 30 mins, as Rugby says, and I don't want to change our system as it then screws any 
    comparisons we then make with this or any other season
  • feesh_cafc
    feesh_cafc Posts: 135
    Sullivan - 5.5
    Solly - 7.5
    Morrison - 5.5
    Taylor - 6
    Wiggins - 7.5
    Hollands - 6
    Russell - 5
    Jackson - 5
    Wright-Phillips - 5
    Kermorgant - 6
    Pritchard - 6

  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
    Think there are circumstances the "rules" ought to be changed. If a sub doesnt play 15 mins thats fine, if he's injured fine but if he makes a mistake costs us the game surely we should mark him Most players averages will fall after this game but Hamers doesnt. YET QUITE SIMPLY HE COST US THE GAME
    sorry I disagree, the covering defender Morrison/Taylor also was culpable as was the ref for a poor decision, so where do you draw the line.

    the system we use has been in existence for at least 3 years and as it is used for comparisons I do not wish to change it or we are not comparing like with like, OK Hamer did ***k up but so have other players in previous matches. Also don't worry about Harmer's average as it is pretty low anyway and in the course of a season it will even itself out.

    If at the end of the season there is groundswell of opinion that the system should be changed then that is the time to look at it.
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
    This thread is now closed for marks, stats shortly 
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,966
    hamer 0
    Sullivan 6
    Solly 7.5 MOM
    Morrison 6
    Taylor 6.5
    Wiggins 7
    Hollands 6.5
    Russell 7.5
    Jackson 6.5
    Kermorgant 6
    Wright Phillips 6
    Pritchard 8
    How does Solly become MoM, when he gets a lower mark than Pritchard  (scratches head)


  • Salad
    Salad Posts: 10,189
    I know he wasn't on the pitch long enough but surely hamer should get a mark ... His sending off had a massive impact on the game
    fully agree

Categories

“Marketplace”