Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Thread Sinking

Rothko
Rothko Posts: 18,859
edited July 2007 in General Charlton
Can we have a decent reason why some threads are getting sunk?

I don't mind if the thread is offensive or spam, but just sinking one, cause a moderator can't be arsed with it, or doesn't feel engaged with the content, is wrong, and a bit annoying, let threads die naturally, and don't keep sinking them, when a moderator feels like they need to excert some editorial control over a messageboard
«134

Comments

  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,107
    sink this please

    ;-)
  • Curb_It
    Curb_It Posts: 21,263
    am with you on this.

    have absolutely no idea why that was sunk!
    i dont read loads of posts on here as have no interest but this one was. people were putting arguments across well i thought... tho i could feel the smoke coming out of Stu's ears. you can imagine him running outside for a couple of fags in between!
  • ThreadKiller
    ThreadKiller Posts: 8,638
    can we have more threads moaning for the sake of moaning?
  • Curb_It
    Curb_It Posts: 21,263
    give us an answer why you sunk that thread?
    come on.

    dans away so it was either you or stanmore?
  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,107
    edited July 2007
    How very dare you accuse me.

    180px-Lou-Carpenter_Tom-Oliver-1988-and-1992....jpg

    ;-)
  • MCS
    MCS Posts: 8,404
    [cite]Posted By: Curb_It[/cite]give us an answer why you sunk that thread?
    come on.

    dans away so it was either you or stanmore?

    or me!!??
  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,345
    I'd like to know too, I couldn't see anything wrong with it.

    We have presently got nearly all Charlton related stuff covered. Nicky Weaver - check. Pre season games - check. Signings so far - check. The list goes on, I don't think it was doing any harm.
  • Curb_It
    Curb_It Posts: 21,263
    well if you had the cheek to say it was boring then sunk it - well i tell you what young man next time i see you im going to spank your bum.
  • T
    T Posts: 1,349
    "I don't think it was doing any harm. "

    Unlike smoking in pubs *Ducks*

    I assumed AKFA as a smoker had oppressed to non smokers, i didn't realise there were other admin here.
  • MCS
    MCS Posts: 8,404
    [cite]Posted By: Curb_It[/cite]well i tell you what young man next time i see you im going to spank your bum.

    ace, normally have to pay good money for that kind of treatment. Nah not really i didnt sink it, but wanted to. I have never sunk nowt! I just said it was boring me and then logged off.

  • Sponsored links:



  • cunningstunt87
    cunningstunt87 Posts: 1,100
    Damn right. Un-sink our smoking thread!!!!!!
  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,345
    [cite]Posted By: Curb_It[/cite]well if you had the cheek to say it was boring then sunk it - well i tell you what young man next time i see you im going to spank your bum.

    I SUNK IT, IT WAS ME!! Honest.....
  • Curb_It
    Curb_It Posts: 21,263
    ha ha you're all perves.

    great this - sink a thread and then dont tell us why! wait till the real boss gets back.
  • MCS
    MCS Posts: 8,404
    You can still post on it, it just does not pop to the top anymore. No big deal, and now you and stu can continue your zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz arguement.
  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,151
    [cite]Posted By: MCS[/cite]You can still post on it, it just does not pop to the top anymore. No big deal, and now you and stu can continue your zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz arguement.

    Come on Ol, it was pretty exciting stuff! ;-)
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,859
    It was Stanmore that did it, and like a coward Lou Carpenter always is, he's run off to hide from Harold! ;o)
  • cunningstunt87
    cunningstunt87 Posts: 1,100
    [cite]Posted By: MCS[/cite]You can still post on it, it just does not pop to the top anymore. No big deal, and now you and stu can continue your zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz arguement.

    Actually, it was me vs Stu. And Curb It. And Carter.

    Cunningstunt vs the Smoker Coalition now in court 12.
  • suzisausage
    suzisausage Posts: 11,505
    when people that only log on at the weekend, and would like to put their comments about the smoking ban on here...... they won't find it to do so and start a new one......(hardly anyone searches!)

    and we'll have 2 threads! :-)
  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,345
    And evenings Sooz. Whoever did it must have an ironic sense of humour.
  • MCS
    MCS Posts: 8,404
    But carters posts are funny so i let him off!

  • Sponsored links:



  • Curb_It
    Curb_It Posts: 21,263
    tum ti tum ti tum.. still waiting for the reason.
  • cunningstunt87
    cunningstunt87 Posts: 1,100
    [cite]Posted By: Curb_It[/cite]tum ti tum ti tum.. still waiting for the reason.

    ... Or for it to be resurrected ...

    Someones a bit power happy today!
  • cunningstunt87
    cunningstunt87 Posts: 1,100
    You don't get thread sinking on Net Addicks!!!!!

    *ducks*
  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,918
    Can I just suggest, to anyone still interested in any sunk thread, that you can bookmark it (link in the control panel on the left). That way, you will be kept up to date when new comments are added even when the thread slips off of the first page. That's helpful isn't it?

    I haven't even looked at the activity on the Smoking thread today, so can't comment. I'll look at it, but I'm certainly not going to over rule whoever did sink it. I think that would be a bit off.
  • MCS
    MCS Posts: 8,404
    Well you could always go there instead!

    When i used to work in a shop, i would have these people come in and say 'its 20p cheaper down the road' my reply was always 'Well go on then go there then instead of wasting my time.'
  • Medders
    Medders Posts: 5,572
    Bit of a shame that no one is admitting to sinking it....

    Out of interest Lookout, how many people have the rights to sink threads?
  • cunningstunt87
    cunningstunt87 Posts: 1,100
    [cite]Posted By: LoOkOuT[/cite]Can I just suggest, to anyone still interested inanysunk thread, that you can bookmark it (link in the control panel on the left). That way, you will be kept up to date when new comments are added even when the thread slips off of the first page. That's helpful isn't it?

    I haven't even looked at the activity on the Smoking thread today, so can't comment. I'll look at it, but I'm certainly not going to over rule whoever did sink it. I think that would be a bit off.

    Maybe it would be off. But someone has chosen to sink it out of spite, as they don't like it personally. Numerous people want it reinstated, so appease the majority.
  • F-Blocker
    F-Blocker Posts: 3,409
    Lookout - go on, reclaim your site while AFKA's not around. A bloodless coup on a Friday afternoon! ;o)
  • suzisausage
    suzisausage Posts: 11,505
    to be honest. i think the majority don't care. there are only about 8 people talking about it.

    lets just move on. it can carry on, its not going to be unsunk, no point having threads moaning about other threads. debate on that about smoking or non and lets get over it.

    its friday everyone, cheer up.
  • cunningstunt87
    cunningstunt87 Posts: 1,100
    edited July 2007
    I would cheer up, if threads weren't being locked for no reason. Was there a gain to sinking it?? The majority might not care, but there was enough people posting for it not to require sinking.