Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Premier League 20 Year Table

bingaddick
bingaddick Posts: 8,184
edited May 2012 in General Charlton
Just see thiswww1.skysports.com/football/news/11096/7773572/The-20-year-table

We are 21st out of 45

Comments

  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,209
    Yeah, but we have 468 games in hand, on our current form we'll be top by Christmas.
  • bingaddick
    bingaddick Posts: 8,184
    Yeah, but we have 468 games in hand, on our current form we'll be top by Christmas.
    Lol!

    Still well ahead of that stripy massive from Croydon. No sign at all of the Spanners....:-)
  • kafka
    kafka Posts: 2,372
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
  • CafcCrazy
    CafcCrazy Posts: 808
    surprised to see west sham are not anywhere to be seen... belong in the premiership ? Media know nothing.
  • bingaddick
    bingaddick Posts: 8,184
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    West London
  • Mike
    Mike Posts: 6,167
    surprised to see west sham are not anywhere to be seen... belong in the premiership ? Media know nothing.
    they are 11th?
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,735
    interesting to see that half the football league have been in the top division over the last 20 yrs and in that time only 7 clubs have been there all the time..............not such an "exclusive" league after all !!!
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,969
    45 is an amazing number, and only 5 of those teams were one season wonders!

    I'm surprised we're above Leicester and Birmingham, and it's interesting that the Hammers are 10th in terms of appearances in the PL, suggesting that their boasts about belonging in the PL aren't entirely false...
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,122
    I don't get the West Ham comment at all.

    Bolton have played more games than Leeds!
  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    I think that That Wimbledon is in Milton Keynes now ?
    Or is it AFCWimbledon ?
    I get confused very easily......


  • Sponsored links:



  • tangoflash
    tangoflash Posts: 10,787
    This league table was commisioned by Liverpool, as it's the only one that puts them in the top 4............................
  • JohnBoyUK
    JohnBoyUK Posts: 9,042
    Blimey, didnt really expect to see Tottenham as high as that. Would be interesting to see it sorted on a points per game basis.
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486
    @JohnBoyUK
    http://www.statbunker.com/football/ktg/index.php?PL=ktgalltime&Code=EPL&statType=EPL_ALL
  • CAFCdamo
    CAFCdamo Posts: 1,692
    @JohnBoyUK
    http://www.statbunker.com/football/ktg/index.php?PL=ktgalltime&Code=EPL&statType=EPL_ALL
    Interestingly on that table it says "MK Dons" instead of "Wimbledon".
  • Chrispy51
    Chrispy51 Posts: 473
    45 is an amazing number, and only 5 of those teams were one season wonders!

    I'm surprised we're above Leicester and Birmingham, and it's interesting that the Hammers are 10th in terms of appearances in the PL, suggesting that their boasts about belonging in the PL aren't entirely false...

    4 - Swansea are one of the 5 and they will be there next year
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,438
    I worked out points per game and...we're still 21st.
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    I worked out points per game and...we're still 21st.
    22nd according to the above link
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,438
    I worked out points per game and...we're still 21st.
    22nd according to the above link
    Oops, my bad. 22 it is.

  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,902
    Blimey, didnt really expect to see Tottenham as high as that. Would be interesting to see it sorted on a points per game basis.
    As one of the only ever presents I thought you would definitely be in the top 7.

  • DA9
    DA9 Posts: 11,093
    edited May 2012
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    Technically speaking they were in Merton, which is Surrey in my book, so still No1 in South London.

  • Sponsored links:



  • DA9
    DA9 Posts: 11,093
    How did Leicester manage to play 4 more prem games than us, when did they lose 2 teams from the original 1992 teams/table?
  • C_A_F_C
    C_A_F_C Posts: 3,867
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    Technically speaking they were in Merton, which is Surrey in my book, so still No1 in South London.
    In my book West Ham is Essex. Arsenal, Chelsea, Fulham & Tottenham are Middlesex

    Number 1 in London....
  • Uboat
    Uboat Posts: 12,201
    Number 1 in Kent - and that is a fact.
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,122
    How did Leicester manage to play 4 more prem games than us, when did they lose 2 teams from the original 1992 teams/table?
    The league was reduced from 22 teams in 20 teams in '95, some team called crystal palace were the extra team to go down with only two teams going up from Div 1.

  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    Technically speaking they were in Merton, which is Surrey in my book, so still No1 in South London.
    I think that That Wimbledon is in Milton Keynes now ?
    Or is it AFCWimbledon ?
    I get confused very easily......
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Palace's goal difference is better than ours.

Categories

“Marketplace”