A Koc & bull story?

PragueAddick said:

vff said:

Not the end of the world though ?

1st Feb is my key date. Then we will have a much clearer idea about our financial health

Why?

Oh yeah.....was being a bit dunce there! Thought Prague had some more "itk" stuff

This thread is pathetic.

Some of you want to be a bit more choosy about who and what you believe.

sunbury-addick said:

At least Man U, Arse, Liverpool generated the income to spend big - fair play to 'em. Chelsea and Man City totally different, don't think (not really sure tho' tbh) I'd want us like that

They only managed to do that because they screwed over every other club much worse then City or Chelsea have done, they just did it back in the so called "glory days" of football when money didnt matter, which is laughable.

Rothko said:

Because the transfer window closes, and if Solly, Stephens and Hamer are still at the club, it'll tell a lot of us that things aren't that bad.

But September 1st didn't tell us that?

sunbury-addick said:

GretnaGreenAddick said:

sunbury-addick said:

At least Man U, Arse, Liverpool generated the income to spend big - fair play to 'em. Chelsea and Man City totally different, don't think (not really sure tho' tbh) I'd want us like that

They only managed to do that because they screwed over every other club much worse then City or Chelsea have done, they just did it back in the so called "glory days" of football when money didnt matter, which is laughable.

Sorry Gretna - you have lost me with that one, I don't like any of the clubs I mentioned, they made money thru' winning, big crowds, merchandise and kept re-investing - who and how did they screw over ?

I don't have long but the basic principle is that Arsenal/Utd/Liverpool with the other bigger European clubs made the system that rewarded them much more then there league opponents, which helped make a gulf of finances, the system was so corrupt it has meant the only way for any team to on a regular basis change things is if they have a big investor, if they had never created the corrupt system then we would not have the need for clubs like City/Chelsea to do what they do.

Ideally we would not have them spending hundreds of millions on players but blame those clubs not City/Chelsea.

Defending those clubs is like the people who think we should all still bow to the royals, keep everyone in there place.

Hope that helps but im in a bit of a rush.

Off_it said:

By the way, I heard that Kuwaiti money could be in the mix.

Source?

CAFCsayer said:

Oh dear... Acworth thinks we are being taken over by a consortium of arabs;

Wait for it...




Led by David Beckham, because his dad is a Charlton fan.

He's really not all there is he?

Did he say it was David Beckham? I think he said initials are DB. Could be Darren Bent, David Bently, any niumber of others. Beckham's old man is Spurs, isn't he?

Not that any of it is true, of course!!

Derek Branning?....Danny Baker?....Dino Baggio?....Duncan Bannatyne?....David Bowie?

Dani Behr