Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Hull vs Wednesday

Absurdistan
Absurdistan Posts: 8,024
in Other Football and Sports
Semodo joining Llera for 2nd half.
Llera offside for Wednesday goal.
Come on Hull.
«1

Comments

  • O-Randy-Hunt
    O-Randy-Hunt Posts: 10,666
    That was brilliant. Wednesday off celebrating there 2nd goal only for the ref to dissallow it and let hull play on
  • Super_horns
    Super_horns Posts: 1,299
    edited January 2013
    Ouch...don't think Dave Jones is going to be too happy..

    Mind you didn't they get the rub of a "foul on goalie" decision against Barnsley?

    EDIT: 2-1 SW now.
  • Mike
    Mike Posts: 6,166
    big win this for weds
  • O-Randy-Hunt
    O-Randy-Hunt Posts: 10,666
    Shocking keeping.
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,866
    O-Randy-Hunt said:

    Shocking keeping.

    I don't think he was really hurt there either. He was just embarrassed.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,156
    1-3 atm penalty to Hull to be taken in the 102nd minute
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,156
    penalty saved by kirkland
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,785
    Only just turned it on. Why so much added time?
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,156
    i think when wednesday went 1-2 up the Hull keeper got injured letting that one in and was down for ten mins before being stretchered off, i only saw him going off
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,866
    Callumcafc said:

    Only just turned it on. Why so much added time?

    Hull keeper threw one in from a corner then feigned an injury. Laying there for 10 minutes.

  • Sponsored links:



  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,047
    That was a terrible, terrible penalty
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,866
    Charlton badge on the screen behind Big Mig being interviewed.
  • O-Randy-Hunt
    O-Randy-Hunt Posts: 10,666
    Off_it said:

    O-Randy-Hunt said:

    Shocking keeping.

    I don't think he was really hurt there either. He was just embarrassed.
    I thought the same but then the stretcher came on. He was holding his face but did he even take a wack to the face
  • Beckboy
    Beckboy Posts: 1,682
    Can someone translate what llera just said ;-)
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,047
    Beckboy said:

    Can someone translate what llera just said ;-)

    Missed the interview, but I'm assuming his English hasn't come on much ?
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,223
    Beckboy said:

    Can someone translate what llera just said ;-)

    Something about wishing he hadn't left a real massive club.
  • hoof_it_up_to_benty
    hoof_it_up_to_benty Posts: 22,450
    se9addick said:

    Beckboy said:

    Can someone translate what llera just said ;-)

    Missed the interview, but I'm assuming his English hasn't come on much ?
    Used to live near Big Mig - his English wasn't too bad when I spoke to him.
  • C_Jensens_Love_Child
    C_Jensens_Love_Child Posts: 1,598
    Have to say well done Wendies, from what I caught after getting home from 30 minutes on, they deserved their win. Wanted them to lose for a couple of reasons but hats off to them.
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,629
    this match showed that there can be little difference between the majority of clubs in this league, which I think will make promotion and relegation a cliff hanger until thelast kck of the last game of the season.
  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247
    Cheers for the sentiments it should of been 1-4 with that goal chalked off - Wolves next week
  • Sponsored links:



  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,641
    edited January 2013
    I believe that was the 3rd time Sheff W have been on TV this season.............perhaps operation pig can tell us
  • DRAddick
    DRAddick Posts: 3,588
    operationpig said:

    Cheers for the sentiments it should of been 1-4 with that goal chalked off - Wolves next week

    No it shouldn't 'cause your first should have been given offside.
  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247
    DRAddick said:

    operationpig said:

    Cheers for the sentiments it should of been 1-4 with that goal chalked off - Wolves next week

    No it shouldn't 'cause your first should have been given offside.
    Level.

  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247
    edited January 2013
    golfaddick said:

    I believe that was the 3rd time Sheff W have been on TV this season.............perhaps operation pig can tell us

    Leeds, Mboro, Barnsley and Hull I think (League) DLWW

    Oldham (Lcup) W

  • DRAddick
    DRAddick Posts: 3,588
    operationpig said:

    DRAddick said:

    operationpig said:

    Cheers for the sentiments it should of been 1-4 with that goal chalked off - Wolves next week

    No it shouldn't 'cause your first should have been given offside.
    Level.

    How was Llera level when your scorer headed it?

  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247
    Grey area though isn't it, was he interfering? Some give it some don't.
  • DRAddick
    DRAddick Posts: 3,588
    edited January 2013
    Yes he's interfering, he's In direct line of sight of the keeper and the ball and the close quarters of the players concerned makes it even more certain. He wasn't even slightly to the side which I agree then opens up interpretation. He was offside and I'm sure it would not be so grey if it had been the other way round.
  • operationpig
    operationpig Posts: 2,247
    Oh well, our goal should of stood so I guess it evens it out eh?
  • rananegra
    rananegra Posts: 3,690
    Saw it on FL Show last night and it looked like it evened out between the offside and the disallowed goal. Big win against Hull who have been the best team in Yorkshire for a few years now.
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,957
    edited January 2013
    DRAddick said:

    Yes he's interfering, he's In direct line of sight of the keeper and the ball and the close quarters of the players concerned makes it even more certain.

    Agree entirely, DRA.

    The previous interpretation of the Offside Law was clear cut and a player in an offside position was penalised at the moment the ball was played (unless .... etc).
    The current interpretation is invariably an unfair advantage to the attacking team.


    If an opponent is an offside position, he is ALWAYS interfering with play because his very presence distracts a defender.


    And if you don't know what I mean, try being that defender trying to jockey an opponent when you see another attacker in an offside position making a run behind you. You can't NOT see the 2nd attacker and at that point you are unfairly distracted.






Categories

“Marketplace”