Missed Chances
Comments
-
Agree!! Although you could argue, 'on the balance of play, they should have created plenty of chances and converted some of them' which is kinda fair.
Also "saved by the post" - really? I can't help but feel if the post wasn't there, the goal would've fallen down.0 -
Agreed. Even managers come out with things like "It could have been 6 or 7 by half time"
Really? Could it???0 -
The other one is when a team scores late on in an away leg to make it 1-0. The game finishes that way and the commentator will always go on about the vital away goal.
Except it's bollox. That goal is worth no more than a normal goal. There is no circumstance we it is of any value more than a normal goal.
You're 1-0 going into the home leg. If the opponents score to make it 1-1 on aggregate, then it was only worth 1 goal. If the opponents fail to score, then you win 1-0, still just a normal goal. If the opponents score more than 1 then it's equally worthless.0 -
'He sent the goalkeeper the wrong way' - Utter Drivel.
The reality is most keepers choose the side they are gonna dive to and go for it.0 -
Correct, 'vital away goals' actually happen when teams losing, for example, 2-0 away nick a late consolation, as that completely changes the mathematics, the lead losing 2-1 away knows a 1-0 win will send them though.randy andy said:The other one is when a team scores late on in an away leg to make it 1-0. The game finishes that way and the commentator will always go on about the vital away goal.
Except it's bollox. That goal is worth no more than a normal goal. There is no circumstance we it is of any value more than a normal goal.
You're 1-0 going into the home leg. If the opponents score to make it 1-1 on aggregate, then it was only worth 1 goal. If the opponents fail to score, then you win 1-0, still just a normal goal. If the opponents score more than 1 then it's equally worthless.0 -
By the same token, had Cardiff not gone two up at The Valley, we wouldn't have scored five goals. I 'spose it's the butterfly effect?
0 -
I never understand how forwards can 'hit it too well'0
-
That's not strictly true. Not only does it give an advantage of being a goal in front when you start your home game but it prevents a 1-1 draw at home being a success for the away team in the second leg.randy andy said:The other one is when a team scores late on in an away leg to make it 1-0. The game finishes that way and the commentator will always go on about the vital away goal.
Except it's bollox. That goal is worth no more than a normal goal. There is no circumstance we it is of any value more than a normal goal.
You're 1-0 going into the home leg. If the opponents score to make it 1-1 on aggregate, then it was only worth 1 goal. If the opponents fail to score, then you win 1-0, still just a normal goal. If the opponents score more than 1 then it's equally worthless.
However I think the assumption is that the vital 'away' goal is not specifically a goal that counts double but the potential to lose a goal at home and not have to score two, which you would have to do if you'd not scored away.0 -
I would guess that's because the keeper moves smartly to anticipate the shot, by reading the striker's body movement.thai malaysia addick said:I never understand how forwards can 'hit it too well'
It's a striker's miss-hits and deflections, which a keeper cannot legislate for.
0 -
periods of being in the ascendancy chances missed.0








