Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Albert Einstein

Ok, he may have hit upon e=mc^2

I only have one problem...

He wasn't really that good at maths and didn't really dominate the public image of modern science.

Can anyone say that they are really happy with Einstein's contribution?

Dara O'Briain's quite good at maths and it will be interesting to see which other lifers would agree that he would be a good choice to come up with the next major advance in modern science?

Love from dippee
«1

Comments

  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    Rachel from countdown has been responsible for many major advancements...
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,043
    And his hair...what was all that about?? Dara doesn't have that problem for starters and Rachel certainly has a number of outstanding points already to her credit!
  • Folev the red
    Folev the red Posts: 2,087
    Dara also isn't German.

    But problem is he's Irish...
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,021
    You are absolutely correct Dippee. I think that Einstein is a bit like Leaburn; full of promise as a youngster, but thrown in deep too soon and couldn't handle it. He's done nothing for the past 60 years. There's no plan B, I don't think he could put out a new theory if he tried.

    He's not the only one though. Take Newton, he might have invented gravity, but he didn't have a clue about quantum mechanics. I mean, what's the point of coming up with something as usful a gravity if you don't understand the mysterious shimerings of sub-atomic particles - they're gonna get you every time. Embarrassing.

    The there's DaVinci. Calls himself a great artist and inventor. Have you seen his notebooks? My kids can produce neater looking reports.

    And that Hawking's useless. I bet he's not been near the training pitch in years. You can't build that reputation just on being a great dribbler and having nothing else to your game. And as for Archimedes, what a waste of space; I've never know a scientist screw up so much.

  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,212
    Stig said:


    The there's DaVinci. Calls himself a great artist and inventor. Have you seen his notebooks? My kids can produce neater looking reports.

    I went to see his cartoons at the National Gallery.

    Didn't laugh once
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,590
    Stig said:



    He's not the only one though. Take Newton, he might have invented gravity, but he didn't have a clue about quantum mechanics. I mean, what's the point of coming up with something as usful a gravity if you don't understand the mysterious shimerings of sub-atomic particles - they're gonna get you every time. Embarrassing.


    Scored a good goal against Ipswich in the play off semi though.
  • Loco
    Loco Posts: 1,037
    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.
  • Jayajosh
    Jayajosh Posts: 2,877
    Watched a progamme the other date about Issac Newton...now he was a real maths genius for his day which was well before Einstein.
  • Big William
    Big William Posts: 3,838
    Ian Dury told you all

    Einstein can't be classed as witless
    He claimed atoms were the littlest
    When you do a little Splitterness
    Frighten everybody shitless



  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,021
    There ain't half some clever b'stards.
  • Sponsored links:



  • legaladdick
    legaladdick Posts: 1,808
    OK. Albert Einstein may have been clever but only half as clever as Albert Zweistein
  • maybe_baby
    maybe_baby Posts: 2,609
    I'm not even happy with my own contribution.
  • smudge7946
    smudge7946 Posts: 4,131
    Has e+mc2 got any practical uses in day to day life?
  • smudge7946
    smudge7946 Posts: 4,131

    Has e=mc2 got any practical uses in day to day life?

  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,853
    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Now if he'd been English, he'd have known that!
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Einstein was not a handsome fellow
    Nobody ever called him Al
    He had a long moustache to pull on, it was yellow
    I don't believe he ever had a girl
    One thing he missed out in his theory
    Of time and space and relativity
    Is something that makes it very clear
    He was never gonna score like you and me
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,072
    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

  • When did Charlton life turn into a Millwall forum?
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,348
    Just thinking that feesh. Discussions on Einstein, poetic tribute...

    Melts
  • cafcpolo
    cafcpolo Posts: 3,811

    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

    Isn't it light in a vacuum though which is constant?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,072
    cafcpolo said:

    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

    Isn't it light in a vacuum though which is constant?
    Correct. All electromagnetic radiation travels at C in a vacuum.
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,590
    cafcpolo said:

    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

    Isn't it light in a vacuum though which is constant?
    Not when the bag's full.
  • Loco
    Loco Posts: 1,037

    Has e+mc2 got any practical uses in day to day life?

    Atomic energy!
  • Loco
    Loco Posts: 1,037
    cafcpolo said:

    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

    Isn't it light in a vacuum though which is constant?
    No light get slowed down accelerated and bent by gravity and magnetism, the point of the equation works because it produces an unquantifiable number but in reality it's wrong.
  • fattmatt
    fattmatt Posts: 580
    Does the equation mean that a small amount of mass has a shit load of energy??
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,597
    fattmatt said:

    Does the equation mean that a small amount of mass has a shit load of energy??

    Solly
  • smudge7946
    smudge7946 Posts: 4,131
    Loco said:

    Has e+mc2 got any practical uses in day to day life?


    Atomic energy!
    thats it?
    i thought it had something to do with time travel. Or i'm i confusing it with flux capacitors and delorean cars?
  • maybe_baby
    maybe_baby Posts: 2,609
    1.5 million HP can be produced with a baked bean can full of plutonium...the calculation to know this is like the hardest sums I've ever had to do.

  • Sensei
    Sensei Posts: 233

    1.5 million HP can be produced with a baked bean can full of plutonium...the calculation to know this is like the hardest sums I've ever had to do.

    Horse Power!!! That unit has seldom been used for energy since the 1960's apart from motive energy. You're either a Yank, very old or your're getting confused with HP Baked Beans ;-)