Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Worse grammar than on here

2»

Comments

  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    97%
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,961
    97% as well. Bl00dy first one wrong.
  • PopIcon said:

    I can understand why people get annoyed with journalists struggling to get their grammar right as its their job, but when people pick holes in fellow supporters posts it gets my goat. Would you go up to a fat man drinking a beer in the North Stand and say "better put that down fatty, does no good for you cholesterol". Didn't think so.

    Supporters'
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,973
    PopIcon said:

    I can understand why people get annoyed with journalists struggling to get their grammar right as its their job, but when people pick holes in fellow supporters posts it gets my goat. Would you go up to a fat man drinking a beer in the North Stand and say "better put that down fatty, does no good for you cholesterol". Didn't think so.

    This.
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,190
    That's the alt text of an image, which has been uploaded by a picture editor. It's the sub-editors who are responsible for grammar, rather than the journalists, but maybe they aren't involved in the process of image uploading. If there are any left anyway. In my experience subs are the first to go.

    Ps I don't think it's just bad grammar that gets picked up on. It's when people are almost unintelligible and their point is being lost that I'd pipe up. People shouldn't be so sensitive about being told. I'd sooner know if I'm getting something wrong!
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,973
    Some people have issues with their spelling and punctuation, some people make typo's, others write something in a rush. I just think it's a bit of a muggy thing to point out. Reminds me of people like Piers Morgan, when losing an argument they start pointing out grammatical errors.