Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton bigger than Palace , it's official!

buckshee
buckshee Posts: 7,867
in General Charlton
Table in today's Mail.


image
«1

Comments

  • Gumbo
    Gumbo Posts: 957
    West Ham fan now @buckshee?
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,079
    edited March 2015
    Not sure about arsenal being bigger than Liverpool, West Bron's position and Leeds being so low but that's a decent list.
  • lo fi
    lo fi Posts: 80
    We are no.1 in South London, that is what matters most
  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,867
    Gumbo said:

    West Ham fan now @buckshee?

    Not mine mate. Moose from talksport.
  • BigRedEvil
    BigRedEvil Posts: 11,070
    And Millwall are still 2nd from bottom!
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 11,983
    West Brom 11th and bigger than West Ham.....hmmmm
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,824
    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??
  • charltonkeston
    charltonkeston Posts: 7,359
    Mid-table once again.
  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,885
    edited March 2015
    AFKABartram said:

    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??

    Just out of interest boss how many different countries do we have Lifers in, didn't you give those stats out once?

    Edit, just seen this on the 'Joint 27th with Fulham' concurrent thread;
    They explain it's based on global following on the clubs' Twitter and Facebook accounts. Must be a lot more overseas Addicks than we thought. Without that 14 ranking Charlton would be quite a bit lower in the overall table. Not to be taken seriously anyway.
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,824
    Vacuous, but good to see us ahead of Palace for the first time in 7 years
  • Sponsored links:



  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,021
    BigRedEvil said:

    And Millwall are still 2nd from bottom!

    So much for all this absolute nonsense they like to prattle on about, about being "the worlds biggest small club". They ain't even that. They're the second smallest middling club in England.
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,218
    AFKABartram said:

    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??

    All the Reza lovers on Facebook
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,824
    Reza ->
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,021
    AFKABartram said:

    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??

    image
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,995
    Stig said:

    AFKABartram said:

    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??

    image
    yup, that's the one :wink:
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,079
    shirty5 said:

    AFKABartram said:

    Ha, gotta laugh. How did they work out that we've got the 14th highest global fanbase ??

    All the Reza lovers on Facebook
    Facebook gold when Ben Haim signed!

    Leed's global fanbase is 23rd to our 14th, mmm....
  • East_Stand_Loopy
    East_Stand_Loopy Posts: 2,205
    Stig said:

    BigRedEvil said:

    And Millwall are still 2nd from bottom!

    So much for all this absolute nonsense they like to prattle on about, about being "the worlds biggest small club". They ain't even that. They're the second smallest middling club in England.
    Errrr.

    That list shows the top 50.

    Last time I looked, there were 92 clubs in the 4 divisions of the Football League...
  • MillwallFan
    MillwallFan Posts: 3,347
    edited March 2015
    East_Stand_Loopy said:

    Stig said:

    BigRedEvil said:

    And Millwall are still 2nd from bottom!

    So much for all this absolute nonsense they like to prattle on about, about being "the worlds biggest small club". They ain't even that. They're the second smallest middling club in England.
    Errrr.

    That list shows the top 50.

    Last time I looked, there were 92 clubs in the 4 divisions of the Football League...
    I think you need to read his post again mate. Even this thick Millwall knuckle dragger gets it. ;-)
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,021
    East_Stand_Loopy said:

    Stig said:

    BigRedEvil said:

    And Millwall are still 2nd from bottom!

    So much for all this absolute nonsense they like to prattle on about, about being "the worlds biggest small club". They ain't even that. They're the second smallest middling club in England.
    Errrr.

    That list shows the top 50.

    Last time I looked, there were 92 clubs in the 4 divisions of the Football League...
    Yes, that's why I said 'middling'. The ones below are too small to be mentioned.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,219
    edited March 2015
    buckshee said:

    Table in today's Mail.


    image

    Isn't the most interesting fact here that buckshee drinks out of a "Keep Calm and follow West Ham" mug
  • Sponsored links:



  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,867
    Henry Irving said:

    buckshee said:

    Table in today's Mail.


    image

    Isn't the most interesting fact here that buckshee drinks out of a "Keep Calm and follow West Ham" mug
    Not me matey

    image
  • jonseventyfive
    jonseventyfive Posts: 3,353
    Surprisingly more addicks than you would think up here in Northamptonshire, we train down from Bedford with only 1 palace fan, he takes our differing opinions very well indeed.
  • stevedixon
    stevedixon Posts: 48
    Brighton & Bristol City below Wigan?
  • jbcafc
    jbcafc Posts: 379
    Online link if interested: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3011776/Are-Manchester-United-Liverpool-Arsenal-Chelsea-biggest-club-Sportsmail-s-study-finally-settles-football-s-great-debate.html
  • thai malaysia addick
    thai malaysia addick Posts: 18,333
    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.
  • Hovi's Biscuit
    Hovi's Biscuit Posts: 1,717
    thai malaysia addick said:

    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.

    Paddy McCarthy was probably still there when the article was being written ;-)
  • cafcrocky87
    cafcrocky87 Posts: 421
    thai malaysia addick said:

    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.

    Number of players to have represented England historically, plus number of representatives at the 2014 World Cup.
  • MountsfieldPark
    MountsfieldPark Posts: 2,074
    thai malaysia addick said:

    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.

    It's based on players who've played for England (not other British or foreign) + players at 2014 World Cup. They've never been in the top flight long enough historically to have much in the way of England players. Any at WC 2014?
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,079
    thai malaysia addick said:

    Seems a bit harsh on Palace to be 29th in player quality. I wonder why that is.

    It's taking the future Pardew factor in to account.
  • MillwallFan
    MillwallFan Posts: 3,347
    Wigan shouldn't even be in top 50.

Categories

“Marketplace”