The 2017 Summer Transfer Rumours Thread (Deadline Day from page 264)

killerandflash said:

https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/27924/charlton-plan-sign-another-goalkeeper-send-highly-rated-youngster-loan/

Another keeper in, with Dillon going out on loan. If this was always the plan, it seems silly that it's been left so late in the summer really

Depends if Dillon Phillips wants to wait around to become our No.1

I know he's only 23-years old and should be biding his time like Joe Aribo and Ezri Konsa neither of whom are assured First-Team players either yet the difference is there is only one Goalkeeper position whilst those two can play across either the Midfield or Defence

killerandflash said:

https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/27924/charlton-plan-sign-another-goalkeeper-send-highly-rated-youngster-loan/

Another keeper in, with Dillon going out on loan. If this was always the plan, it seems silly that it's been left so late in the summer really

I would have thought that most clubs would have sorted themselves out a bit sooner than now, so I really hope he's able to get a loan if we get another keeper in. Don't think he should necessarily expect to be in the squad, but it would be a little unfair for him to be first choice throughout the entire pre-season, only to be left without a club as it's been left so late and with very little or no chance of playing for us all season, unless perhaps this was communicated to him from the off.

ForeverAddickted said:

killerandflash said:

https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/27924/charlton-plan-sign-another-goalkeeper-send-highly-rated-youngster-loan/

Another keeper in, with Dillon going out on loan. If this was always the plan, it seems silly that it's been left so late in the summer really

Depends if Dillon Phillips wants to wait around to become our No.1

I know he's only 23-years old and should be biding his time like Joe Aribo and Ezri Konsa neither of whom are assured First-Team players either yet the difference is there is only one Goalkeeper position whilst those two can play across either the Midfield or Defence

He's been here since he was 11 and just wants to play football now. Can't blame him. If rumours are true his salary isn't great either. I think it's safe to say he will be off as I think he is in his last year of his contract too

Swisdom said:

ForeverAddickted said:

killerandflash said:

https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/27924/charlton-plan-sign-another-goalkeeper-send-highly-rated-youngster-loan/

Another keeper in, with Dillon going out on loan. If this was always the plan, it seems silly that it's been left so late in the summer really

Depends if Dillon Phillips wants to wait around to become our No.1

I know he's only 23-years old and should be biding his time like Joe Aribo and Ezri Konsa neither of whom are assured First-Team players either yet the difference is there is only one Goalkeeper position whilst those two can play across either the Midfield or Defence

He's been here since he was 11 and just wants to play football now. Can't blame him. If rumours are true his salary isn't great either. I think it's safe to say he will be off as I think he is in his last year of his contract too

Yeah according to the Squad List his contract expires next Summer

Do a Chelsea, he can go out on loan if he signs a new three year deal - If not then he doesnt even play for the U23s

*Note I am joking as hate the way Chelsea take this approach

colthe3rd said:

Can someone explain why we're going after another keeper?

Because Phillips needs to play and it is not felt he is ready to be a regular for Charlton.

Now the temporary loan system is more difficult to manage then it would be silly not to have two keepers. Indeed I would even argue it would be useful to have a third

I can't see Martin wanting to come in to play second fiddle to Amos, after several years of being MKD's number 1. It's not like Elliott, Hamer and Pope going to PL clubs with much higher status and salary levels, where being backup is still attractive

killerandflash said:

I can't see Martin wanting to come in to play second fiddle to Amos, after several years of being MKD's number 1. It's not like Elliott, Hamer and Pope going to PL clubs with much higher status and salary levels, where being backup is still attractive

Exactly. I don't see the point in wasting wages on another experienced keeper. If we were going after a younger keeper with something to prove then fine. Personally I'd rather just keep Phillips, play him in cup games and if/when Amos is injured or loses form stick him in.

killerandflash said:

I can't see Martin wanting to come in to play second fiddle to Amos, after several years of being MKD's number 1. It's not like Elliott, Hamer and Pope going to PL clubs with much higher status and salary levels, where being backup is still attractive

From his point of view ideally yes . A lot depends on geography . Robinson said he is 'local' . I understand from the MKD Messageboard that he has moved to Essex recently . A gig closer to home could appeal to him .

dickplumb said:

There is no recall clause.

And even if there was (not doubting you dickplumb) it would be in January during the transfer window and we could deal with it then.

Richard J said:

colthe3rd said:

Can someone explain why we're going after another keeper?

Because Phillips needs to play and it is not felt he is ready to be a regular for Charlton.

Now the temporary loan system is more difficult to manage then it would be silly not to have two keepers. Indeed I would even argue it would be useful to have a third

I believe you can still sign goalkeepers on an emergency loan if required.

Scoham said:

Richard J said:

colthe3rd said:

Can someone explain why we're going after another keeper?

Because Phillips needs to play and it is not felt he is ready to be a regular for Charlton.

Now the temporary loan system is more difficult to manage then it would be silly not to have two keepers. Indeed I would even argue it would be useful to have a third

I believe you can still sign goalkeepers on an emergency loan if required.

Only if there is an injury to both of your recognised keepers. If one lost form you can't replace them any more.

Richard J said:

Scoham said:

Richard J said:

colthe3rd said:

Can someone explain why we're going after another keeper?

Because Phillips needs to play and it is not felt he is ready to be a regular for Charlton.

Now the temporary loan system is more difficult to manage then it would be silly not to have two keepers. Indeed I would even argue it would be useful to have a third

I believe you can still sign goalkeepers on an emergency loan if required.

Only if there is an injury to both of your recognised keepers. If one lost form you can't replace them any more.

Emergency loan system scrapped by EFL in 2016

https://thesun.co.uk/sport/football/2759309/what-is-the-loan-system-when-can-players-be-loaned-does-the-premier-league-have-different-loan-rules-to-the-football-league/

DA9 said:

Richard J said:

Scoham said:

Richard J said:

colthe3rd said:

Can someone explain why we're going after another keeper?

Because Phillips needs to play and it is not felt he is ready to be a regular for Charlton.

Now the temporary loan system is more difficult to manage then it would be silly not to have two keepers. Indeed I would even argue it would be useful to have a third

I believe you can still sign goalkeepers on an emergency loan if required.

Only if there is an injury to both of your recognised keepers. If one lost form you can't replace them any more.

Emergency loan system scrapped by EFL in 2016

https://thesun.co.uk/sport/football/2759309/what-is-the-loan-system-when-can-players-be-loaned-does-the-premier-league-have-different-loan-rules-to-the-football-league/

Not for goalie's if you have 2 injured (from memory).

Martin is fixed up elsewhere apparently & Phillips will be loaned, because he hasn't got the experience, gravitas and not vocal enough (in my opinion) to be the first choice.

Pelling1993 said:

Really really don't want Mavididi, not a bad player by any means but basing your team around a loan player never ends well

We need to sign good players that are hungry to do well and fit into our squad and system. If a loan player is better than anyone we can sign permanently I don't see the problem. As said it worked for Huddersfield.