Players Marks: Scunthorpe v Charlton

Amos:
Solly:
Konsa:
Bauer:
Sarr:
Marshall:
Forster-Caskey:
Kashi:
DaSilva:
R.Holmes:
Magennis:
Ahearne-Grant: n/a
Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
Comments
-
We played pretty well for the most part. Looking forward to the idiotic stream of 3s and 4s7
-
On the feed.
Amos: 6.5
Solly: 6.5
Konsa: 6
Bauer: 6
Sarr: 7
Marshall: 6
Forster-Caskey: 8 joint mom
Kashi: 8 joint mom
DaSilva: 7.5
R.Holmes: 6
Magennis: 7 lone furrow3 -
Amos: 7.5 made a cracking save and could do absolutely nothing about the goals, even if he had extra-long arms
Solly: 6.5 didn't really push forward
Konsa: 7.5 absolute class, had their strikers in his cravat
Bauer: 7 decent show
Sarr: 7 big stuff as usual from a big man. maybe not the best crosser of a football in the world, but he's a centre-back
Marshall: 5.5 to put it simply, he could have been the difference, but his finishing and delivery were held in stark contrast to Morris'
Forster-Caskey: 6.5 yeah he gave away the crucial free-kick, but played well otherwise I thought
Kashi: 8 MOM probably the best player on the pitch...well, until they made their second substitution, that is
DaSilva: 7 all nip and skill, some lovely touches, perhaps overlooked by his teammates a little much
R.Holmes: 7.5 created our two chances with some great play, looked back on it today
Magennis: 5 absolutely had to score his chance, lost the ball far too much - love him but he needs a rest and we need another striker5 -
Watched on stream
Amos: 7
Solly: 6.5
Konsa: 7.5
Bauer: 7.5
Sarr: 7
Marshall: 6
Forster-Caskey: 7
Kashi: 7
DaSilva: 6
R.Holmes: 7
Magennis: 61 -
Ifollow
Amos: 7
Solly: 6
Konsa: 7
Bauer: 7
Sarr: 7
Marshall: 5.5 Not been impressed with him, Too early to judge as he has come back from injury. But his control is shocking at times and his one on one with the keeper was truly pathetic.
Forster-Caskey: 6
Kashi: 7
DaSilva: 7
R.Holmes: 7
Magennis: 5 As our only striker he really needs to start scoring. All round play no where near as good as last season.
No one on the bench to be able to change things about. We were much better then Scunthorpe first half. and Josh and Marshall should have scored. Scunthorpe were nothing besides the 2 class goals Morris scored. Get a full squad and we can piss this league.4 -
Amos: 6.5 No chance with the two worldies not sure about the two man wall for 1st tho
Solly: 6 Steady and committed
Konsa: 7.5 Very assured and comfortable with Bauer alongside him good game
Bauer: 7.5 Glad to see him back solid as a rock subbed late on
Sarr: 6 Played at left back bit of a mixed bag today but worth his place
Marshall: 5.5 Very disappointing, lots of ball little end product, missed a one on one again crossing very inconsistent.
Forster-Caskey: 8 In top form enjoying his football at the moment
Kashi: 6.5 Usual tidy and busy had the foul given against him I think for 1st goal
DaSilva: 6.5 Lots of pace and energy in midfield not so effective when LB after Bauer went off
R.Holmes: 7 Usual Ricky tireless running with the ball sadly nothing to show for it
Magennis: 6 Hit the post unlucky not to score, kept going but didn't always hold it up like he should have. Tough ask ploughing a lone furrow week in week out.4 -
Solid performance, but there will be one reason only as to why we don’t go up this year.. Josh magennis is not good enough! The amount of chances he has squandered this year is adding up1
-
Amos: 7 - top save, 2 Amoses couldn't have stopped their goals, better kicking
Solly: 6 - looked a bit slow I thought
Konsa: 7 - some great defending but what was that daft business at the end all about?
Bauer: 7 - solid
Sarr: 7 - I like Naby, some heroic kicking clearances
Marshall: 5.5 - runs but not much else there, should have scored his 1v1
Forster-Caskey: 6.5 - I really like JFC but don't get much to come off for him today
Kashi: 7.5 - MOTM just everywhere doing everything at all times
DaSilva: 6.5 - unaccustomed to him there, he did a job but not much end product
R.Holmes: 7 - so passionate and energetic today but no joy
Magennis: 5.5 - frustrated and caught offside few times. More shooting than I'm used to from him but no goal!
Ahearne-Grant: n/a
Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
2 - Sponsored links:
-
Amos: 7
Solly: 6
Konsa: 7
Bauer: 7
Sarr: 6
Marshall: 6
Forster-Caskey: 6
Kashi: 7
DaSilva: 6
R.Holmes: 7
Magennis: 50 -
Why not just stick to the request and not post comments, it’s like you can’t help yourself becomes a bit tedious. People can give what marks they want.Leuth said:We played pretty well for the most part. Looking forward to the idiotic stream of 3s and 4s
9 -
At the game.
Amos: 7
Solly:6
Konsa:7
Bauer:8
Sarr:7
Marshall:6
Forster-Caskey:6
Kashi:7
DaSilva:7
Holmes :8
Magennis:50 -
Ar trhe game
Amos: 7
Solly:6.5
Konsa: 6.5
Bauer: 6.5
Sarr: 6
Marshall: 6.5
Forster-Caskey: 6.5
Kashi: 6,5
DaSilva: 6.5
R.Holmes: 6.5
Magennis: 60 -
Watched on ifollow (but really sharp...)
Amos: 6
Solly:6
Konsa:7
Bauer:7
Sarr:7
Marshall:6
Forster-Caskey:7
Kashi:7
DaSilva:7
Holmes :7.5
Magennis:70 -
One of those games that we should just shrug our shoulders and put behind us - thought we were better team but incisiveness is not our strong point.
Amos: 6.5 - brilliant save in 1st half, maybe at fault for wall positioning for first goal, but not a cat-in-hells chance for 2nd.
Solly: 6 average.
Konsa: 6.5 Solid, maybe a bit elaborate at times.
Bauer: 6.5 Solid, nothing got past him
Sarr: 6.5 as per Bauer
Marshall: 5 Hmmm, i have my doubts about him, should have done better with 1 on 1 , his second touch made it harder for him
Forster-Caskey: 6.5 ran around a bit.
Kashi: 7 Intelligent, industrious and sometimes inventive.
DaSilva: 7.5 best player on park, was everywhere and skilful with it
R.Holmes: 6 ran around a lot.
Magennis: 5 didnt run around much. Should have scored with header. The more i see of him, the more i think he's simply not very good.0 -
Magennis unlucky not to score? Absolute sitterRedChaser said:Amos: 6.5 No chance with the two worldies not sure about the two man wall for 1st tho
Solly: 6 Steady and committed
Konsa: 7.5 Very assured and comfortable with Bauer alongside him good game
Bauer: 7.5 Glad to see him back solid as a rock subbed late on
Sarr: 6 Played at left back bit of a mixed bag today but worth his place
Marshall: 5.5 Very disappointing, lots of ball little end product, missed a one on one again crossing very inconsistent.
Forster-Caskey: 8 In top form enjoying his football at the moment
Kashi: 6.5 Usual tidy and busy had the foul given against him I think for 1st goal
DaSilva: 6.5 Lots of pace and energy in midfield not so effective when LB after Bauer went off
R.Holmes: 7 Usual Ricky tireless running with the ball sadly nothing to show for it
Magennis: 6 Hit the post unlucky not to score, kept going but didn't always hold it up like he should have. Tough ask ploughing a lone furrow week in week out.1 -
Disagree, he'll be gutted he never scored but a difficult acute angle for a header and he did the correct thing heading back across the keeper. Have a look at that goal attempt againcafcfan1990 said:
Magennis unlucky not to score? Absolute sitterRedChaser said:Amos: 6.5 No chance with the two worldies not sure about the two man wall for 1st tho
Solly: 6 Steady and committed
Konsa: 7.5 Very assured and comfortable with Bauer alongside him good game
Bauer: 7.5 Glad to see him back solid as a rock subbed late on
Sarr: 6 Played at left back bit of a mixed bag today but worth his place
Marshall: 5.5 Very disappointing, lots of ball little end product, missed a one on one again crossing very inconsistent.
Forster-Caskey: 8 In top form enjoying his football at the moment
Kashi: 6.5 Usual tidy and busy had the foul given against him I think for 1st goal
DaSilva: 6.5 Lots of pace and energy in midfield not so effective when LB after Bauer went off
R.Holmes: 7 Usual Ricky tireless running with the ball sadly nothing to show for it
Magennis: 6 Hit the post unlucky not to score, kept going but didn't always hold it up like he should have. Tough ask ploughing a lone furrow week in week out.. Here's a still of it;
Sorry Lancs couldn't let that one go without correction.
1 -
I hope you see the irony.palarsehater said:
Why not just stick to the request and not post comments, it’s like you can’t help yourself becomes a bit tedious. People can give what marks they want.Leuth said:We played pretty well for the most part. Looking forward to the idiotic stream of 3s and 4s
0 -
Will come back and make notes later. Writing long things on my tablet sucks.
Amos: 7
Solly: 6
Konsa: 8
Bauer: 8
Sarr: 7.5
Marshall: 5.5
Forster-Caskey: 7
Kashi: 8
DaSilva: 7
R.Holmes: 7
Magennis: 5.5
0 - Sponsored links:
-
Was actually a great saveRedChaser said:
Disagree, he'll be gutted he never scored but a difficult acute angle for a header and he did the correct thing heading back across the keeper. Have a look at that goal attempt againcafcfan1990 said:
Magennis unlucky not to score? Absolute sitterRedChaser said:Amos: 6.5 No chance with the two worldies not sure about the two man wall for 1st tho
Solly: 6 Steady and committed
Konsa: 7.5 Very assured and comfortable with Bauer alongside him good game
Bauer: 7.5 Glad to see him back solid as a rock subbed late on
Sarr: 6 Played at left back bit of a mixed bag today but worth his place
Marshall: 5.5 Very disappointing, lots of ball little end product, missed a one on one again crossing very inconsistent.
Forster-Caskey: 8 In top form enjoying his football at the moment
Kashi: 6.5 Usual tidy and busy had the foul given against him I think for 1st goal
DaSilva: 6.5 Lots of pace and energy in midfield not so effective when LB after Bauer went off
R.Holmes: 7 Usual Ricky tireless running with the ball sadly nothing to show for it
Magennis: 6 Hit the post unlucky not to score, kept going but didn't always hold it up like he should have. Tough ask ploughing a lone furrow week in week out.. Here's a still of it;
Sorry Lancs couldn't let that one go without correction.3 -
When was Magennis' last goal with his feet ?0
-
For us I can't remember. He had one for San Marino for NI, but all his goals for us this year have been with his head.wmcf123 said:When was Magennis' last goal with his feet ?
And think it's harsh to call that header a sitter. As mentioned keeper made a save and it hit the inside of the far post from a really acute angle.
That said, he had two with his feet that he should have put on target.0 -
Everyone entitled to their opinion but I don't agree with that. I don't see it was a difficult angle, I see it as a complete sitter. The still proves nothing as can be misleading. I was there but couldn't see it clearly. Having watched the replay, I stand by the fact it was a sitter and i haven't conclusively seen it was a save.RedChaser said:
Disagree, he'll be gutted he never scored but a difficult acute angle for a header and he did the correct thing heading back across the keeper. Have a look at that goal attempt againcafcfan1990 said:
Magennis unlucky not to score? Absolute sitterRedChaser said:Amos: 6.5 No chance with the two worldies not sure about the two man wall for 1st tho
Solly: 6 Steady and committed
Konsa: 7.5 Very assured and comfortable with Bauer alongside him good game
Bauer: 7.5 Glad to see him back solid as a rock subbed late on
Sarr: 6 Played at left back bit of a mixed bag today but worth his place
Marshall: 5.5 Very disappointing, lots of ball little end product, missed a one on one again crossing very inconsistent.
Forster-Caskey: 8 In top form enjoying his football at the moment
Kashi: 6.5 Usual tidy and busy had the foul given against him I think for 1st goal
DaSilva: 6.5 Lots of pace and energy in midfield not so effective when LB after Bauer went off
R.Holmes: 7 Usual Ricky tireless running with the ball sadly nothing to show for it
Magennis: 6 Hit the post unlucky not to score, kept going but didn't always hold it up like he should have. Tough ask ploughing a lone furrow week in week out.. Here's a still of it;
Sorry Lancs couldn't let that one go without correction.
IF it was a save by Gilks, then perhaps some slack as it would have gone in, stand by the fact he should have scored IMO0 -
A sitter by my definition is in front of a virtual open goal. He wasn't so we'll have to beg to differ and KR has said the keeper got a finger tip on itcafcfan1990 said:
Everyone entitled to their opinion but I don't agree with that. I don't see it was a difficult angle, I see it as a complete sitter. The still proves nothing as can be misleading. I was there but couldn't see it clearly. Having watched the replay, I stand by the fact it was a sitter and i haven't conclusively seen it was a save.RedChaser said:
Disagree, he'll be gutted he never scored but a difficult acute angle for a header and he did the correct thing heading back across the keeper. Have a look at that goal attempt againcafcfan1990 said:
Magennis unlucky not to score? Absolute sitterRedChaser said:Amos: 6.5 No chance with the two worldies not sure about the two man wall for 1st tho
Solly: 6 Steady and committed
Konsa: 7.5 Very assured and comfortable with Bauer alongside him good game
Bauer: 7.5 Glad to see him back solid as a rock subbed late on
Sarr: 6 Played at left back bit of a mixed bag today but worth his place
Marshall: 5.5 Very disappointing, lots of ball little end product, missed a one on one again crossing very inconsistent.
Forster-Caskey: 8 In top form enjoying his football at the moment
Kashi: 6.5 Usual tidy and busy had the foul given against him I think for 1st goal
DaSilva: 6.5 Lots of pace and energy in midfield not so effective when LB after Bauer went off
R.Holmes: 7 Usual Ricky tireless running with the ball sadly nothing to show for it
Magennis: 6 Hit the post unlucky not to score, kept going but didn't always hold it up like he should have. Tough ask ploughing a lone furrow week in week out.. Here's a still of it;
Sorry Lancs couldn't let that one go without correction.
IF it was a save by Gilks, then perhaps some slack as it would have gone in, stand by the fact he should have scored IMO0 -
If he did then fair enough is a very good save and magennis is unlucky.RedChaser said:
A sitter by my definition is in front of a virtual open goal. He wasn't so we'll have to beg to differ and KR has said the keeper got a finger tip on itcafcfan1990 said:
Everyone entitled to their opinion but I don't agree with that. I don't see it was a difficult angle, I see it as a complete sitter. The still proves nothing as can be misleading. I was there but couldn't see it clearly. Having watched the replay, I stand by the fact it was a sitter and i haven't conclusively seen it was a save.RedChaser said:
Disagree, he'll be gutted he never scored but a difficult acute angle for a header and he did the correct thing heading back across the keeper. Have a look at that goal attempt againcafcfan1990 said:
Magennis unlucky not to score? Absolute sitterRedChaser said:Amos: 6.5 No chance with the two worldies not sure about the two man wall for 1st tho
Solly: 6 Steady and committed
Konsa: 7.5 Very assured and comfortable with Bauer alongside him good game
Bauer: 7.5 Glad to see him back solid as a rock subbed late on
Sarr: 6 Played at left back bit of a mixed bag today but worth his place
Marshall: 5.5 Very disappointing, lots of ball little end product, missed a one on one again crossing very inconsistent.
Forster-Caskey: 8 In top form enjoying his football at the moment
Kashi: 6.5 Usual tidy and busy had the foul given against him I think for 1st goal
DaSilva: 6.5 Lots of pace and energy in midfield not so effective when LB after Bauer went off
R.Holmes: 7 Usual Ricky tireless running with the ball sadly nothing to show for it
Magennis: 6 Hit the post unlucky not to score, kept going but didn't always hold it up like he should have. Tough ask ploughing a lone furrow week in week out.. Here's a still of it;
Sorry Lancs couldn't let that one go without correction.
IF it was a save by Gilks, then perhaps some slack as it would have gone in, stand by the fact he should have scored IMO
Happy to differ on opinion, be boring if we always agreed but I'm disappointed that an International striker missed that chance.
1 -
Gilks saved it 100%.cafcfan1990 said:
Everyone entitled to their opinion but I don't agree with that. I don't see it was a difficult angle, I see it as a complete sitter. The still proves nothing as can be misleading. I was there but couldn't see it clearly. Having watched the replay, I stand by the fact it was a sitter and i haven't conclusively seen it was a save.RedChaser said:
Disagree, he'll be gutted he never scored but a difficult acute angle for a header and he did the correct thing heading back across the keeper. Have a look at that goal attempt againcafcfan1990 said:
Magennis unlucky not to score? Absolute sitterRedChaser said:Amos: 6.5 No chance with the two worldies not sure about the two man wall for 1st tho
Solly: 6 Steady and committed
Konsa: 7.5 Very assured and comfortable with Bauer alongside him good game
Bauer: 7.5 Glad to see him back solid as a rock subbed late on
Sarr: 6 Played at left back bit of a mixed bag today but worth his place
Marshall: 5.5 Very disappointing, lots of ball little end product, missed a one on one again crossing very inconsistent.
Forster-Caskey: 8 In top form enjoying his football at the moment
Kashi: 6.5 Usual tidy and busy had the foul given against him I think for 1st goal
DaSilva: 6.5 Lots of pace and energy in midfield not so effective when LB after Bauer went off
R.Holmes: 7 Usual Ricky tireless running with the ball sadly nothing to show for it
Magennis: 6 Hit the post unlucky not to score, kept going but didn't always hold it up like he should have. Tough ask ploughing a lone furrow week in week out.. Here's a still of it;
Sorry Lancs couldn't let that one go without correction.
IF it was a save by Gilks, then perhaps some slack as it would have gone in, stand by the fact he should have scored IMO1 -
I love Magennis' work rate and attitude but we really need someone that can score regular goals when we are not playing well. I don't think you can go up without a 20 goal striker; yes, I'm aware these are very hard to find0
-
i can but felt it needed to be said its every week and i think people are getting sick of it, there's a post match comments thread ffs, the whole idea of the marks is that people give there opinion and the notion that if someone gives a mark that you don't agree with is somehow idiotic is just plain arrogance. we have enough arguments on here and im no stranger to them but the guys that run the scores every week just dont need it i feel and it pisses me and others off.masicat said:
I hope you see the irony.palarsehater said:
Why not just stick to the request and not post comments, it’s like you can’t help yourself becomes a bit tedious. People can give what marks they want.Leuth said:We played pretty well for the most part. Looking forward to the idiotic stream of 3s and 4s
0 -
Amos: 7
Solly: 7
Konsa: 7.5
Bauer: 6.5
Sarr: 6
Marshall: 6
Forster-Caskey: 7
Kashi: 7
DaSilva: 6.5
R.Holmes: 6
Magennis: 6.50