Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Value of Club

So the rumour is that RD is looking for £40m+ for the club, having paid £14m for it. Those are facts as I understand it? What I don't get is how the value of the club has tripled in four years when we are playing in a lower division with a diminished fanbase. I'm unaware what debts may have existed when the club was bought by RD and I have never got up to speed on the alleged debt to Staprix, but is there a simple fact I'm missing or is RD's valuation just completely unrealistic? Does he really want to sell or is he like the tradesman who doesn't really want the job so quotes way over the odds so he's either bonus quids in or gets turned down?

Comments

  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,465
    Well. To run the club for the last however long he's been here does cost money. He has footed the bill for that..

    And he wants every last penny back..
  • drewman
    drewman Posts: 1,104

    Well. To run the club for the last however long he's been here does cost money. He has footed the bill for that..

    And he wants every last penny back..

    Is that normal? My understanding is that owning most football clubs is like pouring money down the drain. We all know he thought he could do things differently and turn a profit so I guess this is him admitting he spectacularly failed and is trying to recoup his losses.
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,465
    drewman said:

    Well. To run the club for the last however long he's been here does cost money. He has footed the bill for that..

    And he wants every last penny back..

    Is that normal? My understanding is that owning most football clubs is like pouring money down the drain. We all know he thought he could do things differently and turn a profit so I guess this is him admitting he spectacularly failed and is trying to recoup his losses.

    Yes. But Roland didn't view us as a football club. More one of his electronic manufacturing factories where he gets a return on all the money he puts in.
    People often say he bought the wrong club. But in reality he ventured into completely the wrong sector.
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,596
    edited January 2018
    about £8.70.

    Not sure how much is left in the protest fund but down to the casino on roulette, probably only need to guess the number twice in a row and we will probably have enough to buy Mad Dog off.
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,753
    I’d say it’s worth a lot less than when he bought it .
  • eaststandmike
    eaststandmike Posts: 14,956
    Two bob
  • E_cafc
    E_cafc Posts: 2,617
    Buy a house, systematically trash it from day 1. Piss off the neighbours, drive away your friends and family, declare the history of the street irrelevant, sell the back garden and driveway, leave the roof full of holes so the rain pours in, then decide you don't want to live there anymore and demand 3 or 4 times what you paid for it.

    The Duchatelet way of thinking!
  • E-cafc said:

    Buy a house, systematically trash it from day 1. Piss off the neighbours, drive away your friends and family, declare the history of the street irrelevant, sell the back garden and driveway, leave the roof full of holes so the rain pours in, then decide you don't want to live there anymore and demand 3 or 4 times what you paid for it.

    The Duchatelet way of thinking!

    That's not fair, he did improve the lawn.
  • The value of anything is simply what the buyer will pay for it.
  • Chef_addick
    Chef_addick Posts: 2,196
    @NapaAddick is the man to ask on this one, he can give you a full breakdown........................ ;-)
  • Sponsored links:



  • E_cafc
    E_cafc Posts: 2,617

    E-cafc said:

    Buy a house, systematically trash it from day 1. Piss off the neighbours, drive away your friends and family, declare the history of the street irrelevant, sell the back garden and driveway, leave the roof full of holes so the rain pours in, then decide you don't want to live there anymore and demand 3 or 4 times what you paid for it.

    The Duchatelet way of thinking!

    That's not fair, he did improve the lawn.
    Yes he did but he failed to repair the boiler so everyone had to take cold showers.

  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,233

    The value of anything is simply what the buyer will pay for it.

    This.

    The Spivs were asking £35m the summer after we finished 9th. No one would pay it.

    Deloitte were said to have valued the club at the same time at around £22m IIRC

    The Spivs sold for £14m or £18m depending on the source because they were desperate.

    Duchatelet wants £50m because that's how much he's spent. That figure bears no relation to the value according to the prospective buyers hence the current stalemate on the sale.
  • The value of the club whilst Roland has it.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,013
    I'm playing devil's advocate and trying to be more than fair to RD. He might, just might, have a case for say £35M.
    £18M was his purchase price
    £5M increase in freeholds when revalued prior to last accounts
    £3M for repaying the bank loan for the North Stand
    £2m spent on The Valley pitch & stadium improvements (these figures are estimates, I've not looked them up).
    £7M if ex director's loans need repaying.
  • Red_in_SE8
    Red_in_SE8 Posts: 5,961

    I'm playing devil's advocate and trying to be more than fair to RD. He might, just might, have a case for say £35M.
    £18M was his purchase price
    £5M increase in freeholds when revalued prior to last accounts
    £3M for repaying the bank loan for the North Stand
    £2m spent on The Valley pitch & stadium improvements (these figures are estimates, I've not looked them up).
    £7M if ex director's loans need repaying.

    The increase in Premiership TV money during the last 4 years increases the value of any club with a realistic potential of winning promotion to the Premiership within the short to medium future.
  • HardyAddick
    HardyAddick Posts: 1,638

    I'm playing devil's advocate and trying to be more than fair to RD. He might, just might, have a case for say £35M.
    £18M was his purchase price
    £5M increase in freeholds when revalued prior to last accounts
    £3M for repaying the bank loan for the North Stand
    £2m spent on The Valley pitch & stadium improvements (these figures are estimates, I've not looked them up).
    £7M if ex director's loans need repaying.

    If ex directors loans are repaid in full by RD, £35M is about right as a maximum. We are though loosing about £500k pm which any buyer will have to factor in.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,031
    Owning a football club is the ultimate vanity-gamble. You lost Roland, pay up.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,661

    The value of anything is simply what the buyer will pay for it.

    This.

    The Spivs were asking £35m the summer after we finished 9th. No one would pay it.

    Deloitte were said to have valued the club at the same time at around £22m IIRC

    The Spivs sold for £14m or £18m depending on the source because they were desperate.

    Duchatelet wants £50m because that's how much he's spent. That figure bears no relation to the value according to the prospective buyers hence the current stalemate on the sale.
    Therein lies the difference.

    Roland isn't desperate.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,233
    LenGlover said:

    The value of anything is simply what the buyer will pay for it.

    This.

    The Spivs were asking £35m the summer after we finished 9th. No one would pay it.

    Deloitte were said to have valued the club at the same time at around £22m IIRC

    The Spivs sold for £14m or £18m depending on the source because they were desperate.

    Duchatelet wants £50m because that's how much he's spent. That figure bears no relation to the value according to the prospective buyers hence the current stalemate on the sale.
    Therein lies the difference.

    Roland isn't desperate.
    Unfortunately true.
  • LenGlover said:

    The value of anything is simply what the buyer will pay for it.

    This.

    The Spivs were asking £35m the summer after we finished 9th. No one would pay it.

    Deloitte were said to have valued the club at the same time at around £22m IIRC

    The Spivs sold for £14m or £18m depending on the source because they were desperate.

    Duchatelet wants £50m because that's how much he's spent. That figure bears no relation to the value according to the prospective buyers hence the current stalemate on the sale.
    Therein lies the difference.

    Roland isn't desperate.

    nope he doesnt give 2 shits about how long it takes or what damage he does,
  • Sponsored links:



  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,742
    edited January 2018

    I'm playing devil's advocate and trying to be more than fair to RD. He might, just might, have a case for say £35M.
    £18M was his purchase price
    £5M increase in freeholds when revalued prior to last accounts
    £3M for repaying the bank loan for the North Stand
    £2m spent on The Valley pitch & stadium improvements (these figures are estimates, I've not looked them up).
    £7M if ex director's loans need repaying.

    He bought the ex-directors loans, so they were priced in at the outset. I don’t see you can add them now. Ditto the bank debt.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,013

    I'm playing devil's advocate and trying to be more than fair to RD. He might, just might, have a case for say £35M.
    £18M was his purchase price
    £5M increase in freeholds when revalued prior to last accounts
    £3M for repaying the bank loan for the North Stand
    £2m spent on The Valley pitch & stadium improvements (these figures are estimates, I've not looked them up).
    £7M if ex director's loans need repaying.

    He bought the ex-directors loans, so they were priced in at the outset. I don’t see you can add them now. Ditto the bank debt.
    Fair enough, knock off £10M then, but I forgot what has been spent on Sparrows Lane recently. So maybe £28M then ?
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    E-cafc said:

    Buy a house, systematically trash it from day 1. Piss off the neighbours, drive away your friends and family, declare the history of the street irrelevant, sell the back garden and driveway, leave the roof full of holes so the rain pours in, then decide you don't want to live there anymore and demand 3 or 4 times what you paid for it.

    The Duchatelet way of thinking!

    Get PC Property Damage in to do some repairs........

    @E-cafc ; )
  • E_cafc
    E_cafc Posts: 2,617
    That's after the repairs mate lol
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456

    I'm playing devil's advocate and trying to be more than fair to RD. He might, just might, have a case for say £35M.
    £18M was his purchase price
    £5M increase in freeholds when revalued prior to last accounts
    £3M for repaying the bank loan for the North Stand
    £2m spent on The Valley pitch & stadium improvements (these figures are estimates, I've not looked them up).
    £7M if ex director's loans need repaying.

    He bought the ex-directors loans, so they were priced in at the outset. I don’t see you can add them now. Ditto the bank debt.
    Fair enough, knock off £10M then, but I forgot what has been spent on Sparrows Lane recently. So maybe £25.1M then ?