Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Kent CCC 2018

14950525455130

Comments

  • Stewart
    Stewart Posts: 2,451
    edited June 2018
    Middlesex 0/1 Holden duck.

    Guess who got him?

    Podmore
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,738
    OMG !

    Surely nothing can go wrong now......

    :smile:
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789

    FANTASTIC !!!!

    If he can repeat that on Saturday.......

    He's not even guaranteed a place in the team - they would probably have to drop Haggett for him.
    Although he has scored more in this game than a certain batsman has in his last 15 innings so perhaps Haggett shouldn't be the vulnerable one after all.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,651

    LenGlover said:

    We should get 10 overs at them tonight.

    Stewart might be knackered though!

    Knackered? He'll be buzzing!

    There's no way he's going to let anyone else open the bowling.
    He'll be buzzing yes but that doesn't mean he won't be knackered.

    I'd definitely open the bowling with him but my expectations of his success again with the ball tonight are conservative.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    LenGlover said:

    LenGlover said:

    We should get 10 overs at them tonight.

    Stewart might be knackered though!

    Knackered? He'll be buzzing!

    There's no way he's going to let anyone else open the bowling.
    He'll be buzzing yes but that doesn't mean he won't be knackered.

    I'd definitely open the bowling with him but my expectations of his success again with the ball tonight are conservative.
    He'll "labour" to success.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    Harris must be injured as he only bowled 4 overs.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,651

    Harris must be injured as he only bowled 4 overs.

    Yes I noticed that. Scott bowled for them but didn't in the first innings.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789
    Stewart beat an 86 year old record for a Kent batsman batting at 10. Riviera can probably remember tell us who the player was that previously held that record.
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,738
    And a 2nd for Podders !
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    edited June 2018
    17-for 2 wickets. Middlesex need 450 runs to win
  • Sponsored links:



  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915

    Stewart is becoming a viable successor to Stevens.

    He is yet to do it against Surrey for 10 years running.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789

    Stewart is becoming a viable successor to Stevens.

    He is yet to do it against Surrey for 10 years running.
    Stewart has only been with us this season so I know that isn't the case!
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    Close - 22-2. Middlesex need 445 runs to win
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915

    Stewart is becoming a viable successor to Stevens.

    He is yet to do it against Surrey for 10 years running.
    Stewart has only been with us this season so I know that isn't the case!
    My point is he won't replace Stevens until he is the serial bane of Surrey.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,789

    Stewart is becoming a viable successor to Stevens.

    He is yet to do it against Surrey for 10 years running.
    Stewart has only been with us this season so I know that isn't the case!
    My point is he won't replace Stevens until he is the serial bane of Surrey.
    Shouldn't take much.
  • BR3red
    BR3red Posts: 1,715
    Stewart said:

    Middlesex 0/1 Holden duck.

    Guess who got him?

    Podmore

    Knew it was third ball and thought @Stewart doesn't know his cricket... Then re-read "Holden duck"... Me bad!!
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,764
    Great stuff. This Grant Stewart bloke sounds like a find.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    Staggered

    Yes he has promise, but Stewart's achievements this match are ridiculous!
  • Vincenzo
    Vincenzo Posts: 2,911

    Stewart is becoming a viable successor to Stevens.

    He is yet to do it against Surrey for 10 years running.
    Stewart has only been with us this season so I know that isn't the case!
    My point is he won't replace Stevens until he is the serial bane of Surrey.
    Stevens has got another 10 years left in him, surely?
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    Vincenzo said:

    Stewart is becoming a viable successor to Stevens.

    He is yet to do it against Surrey for 10 years running.
    Stewart has only been with us this season so I know that isn't the case!
    My point is he won't replace Stevens until he is the serial bane of Surrey.
    Stevens has got another 10 years left in him, surely?
    Probably. And Blake seems to be the one taking on the mantle of annoying Surrey every time.

    These players would be world class if they performed like that every week rather than just against Surrey!
  • Sponsored links:



  • Vincenzo said:

    Stewart is becoming a viable successor to Stevens.

    He is yet to do it against Surrey for 10 years running.
    Stewart has only been with us this season so I know that isn't the case!
    My point is he won't replace Stevens until he is the serial bane of Surrey.
    Stevens has got another 10 years left in him, surely?
    Probably. And Blake seems to be the one taking on the mantle of annoying Surrey every time.

    These players would be world class if they performed like that every week rather than just against Surrey!
    I'll nibble.

    We've a cup final on Saturday, suggesting our contribution to the RLODC has been consistent, including from Blake who is averaging 45 in the competition. Kuhn averaging 94 and Denly 80.

    That said, we do seem to like beating you and as it's looking increasingly likely that we'll be joining you in the big boy league, we can do you over in even more games next season :-).

    P.S you are a mate, but your Surrey allegiance makes me like you less. :-)

    P.P.S Piss off

    :-)
  • Didn't even mention Henry ffs, who is ripping everyone a new one...
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 11,677
    Nice of Stewart to make an appearance in this match. I was wondering when he was going to do something to justify his place in the side.

    27-3
  • happyvalley
    happyvalley Posts: 8,996
    Early wicket for Stewart 27-3.
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 11,677
    Podders back in the groove ... 36-4
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    40-for 5 wickets
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    Patel c Bell-Drummond b Stewart 13
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 11,677
    Stewart ... wicket ... 40-5

    Middlesex require another 427 to beat Kent.

    Almost as unrealistic, they need another 46 to beat G Stewart.
  • Pair for Malan...
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    The Kent catering staff will be in a panic at the loss all the food and drink sales they were expecting this evening!