Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The influence of the EU on Britain.

1535536538540541607

Comments

  • HarryLime said:

    I'd like it to be a Political Celebrities Pointless Special.
    The Lovely Alexander Armstrong "We surveyed 100 people, and gave the 100 seconds to give as many reasons to want Brexit, Boris you said Blue Passports, lets see how many people said Blue Passports"
    I'd watch that
  • One, if not the most, ridiculously OTT and wholey inaccurate analogies made in this whole Brexit mess.
    OTT puts it mildly.

    Just one example of so many I could have used:

    “Numerous people fell victim to the Nazi regime for political, social, or racial reasons. Germans were among the first victims persecuted because of their political activities. Many died in concentration camps, but most were released after their spirit was broken. Germans who suffered from mental or physical handicaps were killed under a "euthanasia" program. Other Germans were incarcerated for being homosexuals, criminals, or nonconformists; these people, although treated brutally, were never slated for utter annihilation as were the Jews.”

    imageun.org/en/holocaustremembrance/docs/FAQ%20Holocaust%20EN%20Yad%20Vashem.pdf
  • I have to strongly disagree with this view. The contempt and ridicule that the UK is currently receiving from the rest of the civilised world is fully justified. Similarly, the powerful elites who sowed the seeds of this Brexit disaster and the fools who voted for it deserve never ending contempt and ridicule. After nearly 3 years debate and after every single Brexit premise and promise has foundered on the hard rock face of truth, reality and facts, the country is now in deep self inflicted peril. I am truly truly embarrassed to be a citizen of this country. I think I am experiencing the same feelings as the non Nazi voting Germans must have felt in the 1930s.
    If you are comparing Britain today with Nazi Germany you are either very drunk or you are Andrew Adonis.
  • Sadly friends and family, faces in the pub, work colleagues, all Brexiteers. None have smelt the coffee. Troubling times.
  • stonemuse said:

    OTT puts it mildly.

    Just one example of so many I could have used:

    “Numerous people fell victim to the Nazi regime for political, social, or racial reasons. Germans were among the first victims persecuted because of their political activities. Many died in concentration camps, but most were released after their spirit was broken. Germans who suffered from mental or physical handicaps were killed under a "euthanasia" program. Other Germans were incarcerated for being homosexuals, criminals, or nonconformists; these people, although treated brutally, were never slated for utter annihilation as were the Jews.”

    imageun.org/en/holocaustremembrance/docs/FAQ%20Holocaust%20EN%20Yad%20Vashem.pdf
    The Nazi party started winning votes in the early thirties. This was long before the persecution of the Jewish community began in about 1938 and before the mass killings of Jews began in 1941. The Nazi party did not run on a holocaust policy in the early thirties. The term wasn’t even in use then. People outside Germany were astonished to see the German population begin voting for a right wing populist party that blamed all the ills of German society on the Jews and other outsiders and generally won favour by spreading lies and disinformation. Just like the Brexit movement. I am not the first to make the comparison with the rise of the Nazis in the early thirties. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/12/ian-mcewan-decision-on-brexit-vote-reminds-me-of-the-third-reich

    You should maybe read up on the early years of the Nazi party before getting on your high horse.
  • Southbank said:

    If you are comparing Britain today with Nazi Germany you are either very drunk or you are Andrew Adonis.
    Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I was unaware that Andrew Adonis had made exactly the same point about the early Nazi movement and Brexit.
  • One, if not the most, ridiculously OTT and wholey inaccurate analogies made in this whole Brexit mess.

    For rediculously OTT and wholly inaccurate posts made in this whole Brexit mess you should reread your ridiculous rants accusing Corbyn of being racist and an anti Semite.
  • @Red_in_SE8 wins Godwin's law

    (It’s nothing to be proud of, essentially means your incapable of non-extreme language when debating)
  • Sponsored links:


  • Brilliant. As we ‘sleep walk’ toward a no deal, the two tubes want to have a tv debate about it???? To what end? So May can repeat over and over ‘will of the people’, ‘the British people have spoken’ and Corbyn can say a lot without actually telling us that much. More incompetence on show than Meire’s tenure at Charlton
  • cabbles said:

    Brilliant. As we ‘sleep walk’ toward a no deal, the two tubes want to have a tv debate about it???? To what end? So May can repeat over and over ‘will of the people’, ‘the British people have spoken’ and Corbyn can say a lot without actually telling us that much. More incompetence on show than Meire’s tenure at Charlton

    So we can all cast an informed vote in the third referendum that neither May or Corbyn think we should have.
  • edited November 2018
    The idea of TV debates used to make my skin crawl, but the parliamentry debate was nothing more than a lynching that the vast majority didn't watch.

    I believe the more information that's out there the better, put it at a time no one has an excuse to miss it and you may have the chance to get effective support or opposition.

    There'll be repetitive sound bites and 3 adjective descriptions aplenty, but they'll be exposed.

  • For rediculously OTT and wholly inaccurate posts made in this whole Brexit mess you should reread your ridiculous rants accusing Corbyn of being racist and an anti Semite.
    Didn't you get the memo? The cult don't want to debate Corbyn's anti-Semitism on here as they don't want to admit what Margaret Hodge called him to his face (disciplinary action withdrawn just as threats to sue papers over laying threath for terrorists disappeared when photos proved it happened) was true.

    Meanwhile, this sort of anti-Semitism carries on almost unchecked in Corbyn's labour party as it is given license by the Dear Leader's words and actions, such as the wreath laying and fighting tooth and nail against the IHRA definition that he kept rejecting even when his leadership team forced the party to accept it.

  • Chizz said:

    Should we agree at this point that who said what to whom about Nazi Germany isn't a relevant topic on this thread about the current issues facing the UK with a potential exit from the EU?

    I agree, it's a very ugly analogy and, despite the fact that I could provide dozens of references to show that, I take your point and will desist.
  • Sponsored links:


  • holyjo said:

    A country divided against itself is a very sad sight and I’m afraid that’s what we are.

    In my professional life I am a CEO of a social business. We have four different businesses streams that are discreet yet we try to integrate them for added value to our social aims. It’s relatively complex work and the challenges are many and varied

    Notwithstanding the above my team and I rarely if ever struggle to find appropriate solutions to the challenges that we face. I work with creative committed people who have different political opinions and yet we align around the need to meet the challenges of a common cause

    I voted to leave the EU for various reasons but all as a result of my left wing perspective. I would change my vote tomorrow if I had another chance , for two fundamental reasons. The ills of the EU are many but they pale into insignificance as compared to the damage that can be done by living in a divided country. Secondly I have decided that as a 50 year old I would happily now bow to the desire of the young in this country who wish in overwhelming numbers to remain. As it’s that generation/s who will build the country I will live in as an old man I would wish them to have every chance to succeed. Incidentally it’s a matter of fact that seniors , that is plus 65’s voted to leave in overwhelming numbers. For perfectly obvious reasons those numbers will continue to diminish as time marches on

    The leadership from May has been appalling, divisive and partisan within her own party let alone without. The only option now with any hope of success is a new Tory leader or Jeremy Corbyn were he to be in charge to lead a form of a government of National Unity.

    Adversarial , polemic politics has failed us and it’s time for a change of direction. It may seem like a fatuous likelihood but it’s been done before and was a highly successful strategy

    May can sloganise all she wants about MP,s voting in the interest of National Unity but her behaviour over the last two years has been anything but and parliament knows it.Her last throw of the dice is to reach over the heads of parliamentarians to the people and hope we won’t sniff out the lie.

    Churchill was a deeply flawed man and leader. He was an alcoholic who in the early thirties had some admiration for Hitler. He was pretty much the first politician to threaten to use chemical weapons on civilian populations. He held some deeply racist views to boot. And yet and it’s a huge yet , at a moment of national crisis he brought to bear the kind of National leadership that changed forever the history of our world and stopped a maniacal despot in his tracks

    Oh for that kind of leadership now in our time. Someone to rise above the shitstorm and to do something that brings us together and steers parliament and us through this storm. I would love that to be a Labour politician but frankly I care not a hoot where they hail from politically if they can rise above the fray and genuinely act in the National leadership, starting with a government of National Unity

    If my team and I can work together for the good of our beneficiaries surely to God parliament can.

    *starts writing a "@holyjo for PM" banner*

    (And, failing that - have you got any jobs going..?)
  • Chizz said:

    Should we agree at this point that who said what to whom about Nazi Germany isn't a relevant topic on this thread about the current issues facing the UK with a potential exit from the EU? I'm sure there are other corners of Charlton Life where those who are fascinated by squabbles about the Leader of the Opposition's view on antisemitism or the second world war could be discussed in perpetuity. But, just as we've finally developed an interesting and worthwhile exchange of views on the relevant thread topic, and soon after one particularly disruptive poster has been persuaded to desist in posting less relevant comments, it would be a shame if this thread became the latest to be flooded by those with an unhealthy fixation on all things Corbyn.

    The whole Brexit saga is galloping towards its final chapters. It would be great if this thread stayed on-topic. After all, there's probably only ten or twenty years left until Brexit is finished.

    I think we should agree, not least because the word "Nazi" is a dog-whistle everywehere, regardless of whether the user intended it to be so.

    Nevertheless I wish to say that I both understood and had sympathy with the underlying point @Red_in_SE8 wished to make. Possibly because I sit literally in the centre of Europe and see the populist movements from a different perspective - including Britain and Brexit's role in it. All intelligent and moderate people should carefully monitor what is going on, with concern; and most of all not to pretend that Britain is immune from it. That was of course a mistake the country made in the 30s; but this time, is different anyway, because Britain is front and centre of the trend. Let's keep the issue firmly in its place on this thread, but let us not pretend that it doesn't affect the UK nor that it has nothing to do with Brexit.

  • edited November 2018
    Stolen from David Allen Green on Twitter :smiley:

    At the Manor Farm Brexit debate, the creatures watching it on TV looked from Corbyn to May, and from May to Corbyn, and from Corbyn to May again, but it was impossible to say which was which.
  • Question Time studio ROARS as audience member champions NO DEAL – 'nation of innovators'
    THE Question Time studio roared with applause last night after an audience member made a rousing case for leaving the EU with no deal, reminding the panel that “we are a nation of innovators” who have “always” done well.

    I fell asleep to it. I couldn't quite work it out because there was a large round applause for this, but an equally vociferous round of applause for the next comment about giving the people a final say. Then again this was Penzance
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!