Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
I sense a Lord of the Rings style trilogy when Spielberg gets the rights...SomervilleAddick said:
But think of the storys. It’s going to be an epic.Rothko said:So does that mean if they own Atlassian, the clubs going to be run on sprints, have daily stand-ups and post-it notes everywhere?
0 -
I was in the posh bit on new years day (centre circle) and began to think I'd been mistaken for a stinking rich potential buyer and was the cause of all this latest takeover frenzy. It's about as close as I'll ever get to being stinking richnth london addick said:Good match to be in the posh seats tomorrow at then
2 -
Oh dear lordpaulie8290 said:
Hate to burst your fake bubble, but next time can you make it factually correct.Rufus_Ambition said:I was down the Valley earlier and I saw the first signing of the new regime down there. Shouldn't really be posting this but...
We already have a number 11 in Fosu, so its impossible Neymar would get the 11 shirt, unless it was sanctioned by the Football League to change Fosus number10 -
Great heard the neymar deal is off now no one noticed at the FA until you’ve pointed that out you prick26
-
Sorry Pauliepaulie8290 said:
Hate to burst your fake bubble, but next time can you make it factually correct.Rufus_Ambition said:I was down the Valley earlier and I saw the first signing of the new regime down there. Shouldn't really be posting this but...
We already have a number 11 in Fosu, so its impossible Neymar would get the 11 shirt, unless it was sanctioned by the Football League to change Fosus number
3 -
When the north end wrap around was built for £9M with a £6M bank loan, wasn't that secured against The Valley?golfaddick said:And if anyone iflrl
Which is what I said months & months ago. The ex-director loans are a drop in the ocean if/when we get to the Prambobmunro said:
Maybe they don't need to raise finance against the assets, and are happy to let the non-interest bearing loans sit there knowing that should they get to the promised land the first £7m of the £100m+ Prem dividend is used to clear the charges.Davidsmith said:
Would also indicate buyer is an idiot and is happy to pay £20-£30mn for the Club with no control of it's most valuable assets, as charges are over all assets of the Club.bobmunro said:
Which would indicate that The Valley is part of the deal and the charges rollover.Davidsmith said:
Which also means buyer cannot raise any finance against said assets without permission or enter into any Leases on assets.
Worry if new buyer keeps charges outstanding as this is their best bargaining tool with Roland to get price down.
We also don't have details of exactly how much they might have paid, and this could have been negotiated down to reflect the outstanding loans.
They are only paid back then. No interest due either. Could be in 3 years.....could be in 30 years.
If any owner need a to start taking loans secured on the club/ground then they are not the owner you want.0 -
The north stand loan has been paid off.Ferryman said:
When the north end wrap around was built for £9M with a £6M bank loan, wasn't that secured against The Valley?golfaddick said:And if anyone iflrl
Which is what I said months & months ago. The ex-director loans are a drop in the ocean if/when we get to the Prambobmunro said:
Maybe they don't need to raise finance against the assets, and are happy to let the non-interest bearing loans sit there knowing that should they get to the promised land the first £7m of the £100m+ Prem dividend is used to clear the charges.Davidsmith said:
Would also indicate buyer is an idiot and is happy to pay £20-£30mn for the Club with no control of it's most valuable assets, as charges are over all assets of the Club.bobmunro said:
Which would indicate that The Valley is part of the deal and the charges rollover.Davidsmith said:
Which also means buyer cannot raise any finance against said assets without permission or enter into any Leases on assets.
Worry if new buyer keeps charges outstanding as this is their best bargaining tool with Roland to get price down.
We also don't have details of exactly how much they might have paid, and this could have been negotiated down to reflect the outstanding loans.
They are only paid back then. No interest due either. Could be in 3 years.....could be in 30 years.
If any owner need a to start taking loans secured on the club/ground then they are not the owner you want.1 -
I know but it was a regime borrowing against the assets.Airman Brown said:
The north stand loan has been paid off.Ferryman said:
When the north end wrap around was built for £9M with a £6M bank loan, wasn't that secured against The Valley?golfaddick said:And if anyone iflrl
Which is what I said months & months ago. The ex-director loans are a drop in the ocean if/when we get to the Prambobmunro said:
Maybe they don't need to raise finance against the assets, and are happy to let the non-interest bearing loans sit there knowing that should they get to the promised land the first £7m of the £100m+ Prem dividend is used to clear the charges.Davidsmith said:
Would also indicate buyer is an idiot and is happy to pay £20-£30mn for the Club with no control of it's most valuable assets, as charges are over all assets of the Club.bobmunro said:
Which would indicate that The Valley is part of the deal and the charges rollover.Davidsmith said:
Which also means buyer cannot raise any finance against said assets without permission or enter into any Leases on assets.
Worry if new buyer keeps charges outstanding as this is their best bargaining tool with Roland to get price down.
We also don't have details of exactly how much they might have paid, and this could have been negotiated down to reflect the outstanding loans.
They are only paid back then. No interest due either. Could be in 3 years.....could be in 30 years.
If any owner need a to start taking loans secured on the club/ground then they are not the owner you want.0 -
1-4-0-7 it's coming soon.0
-
Whats this mean @CharltonByBloodCharltonByBlood said:
Oh dear lordpaulie8290 said:
Hate to burst your fake bubble, but next time can you make it factually correct.Rufus_Ambition said:I was down the Valley earlier and I saw the first signing of the new regime down there. Shouldn't really be posting this but...
We already have a number 11 in Fosu, so its impossible Neymar would get the 11 shirt, unless it was sanctioned by the Football League to change Fosus number
It was clearly a joke based on @Rufus_Ambition original joke.
3 - Sponsored links:
-
So he hasn’t signed then?paulie8290 said:
Hate to burst your fake bubble, but next time can you make it factually correct.Rufus_Ambition said:I was down the Valley earlier and I saw the first signing of the new regime down there. Shouldn't really be posting this but...
We already have a number 11 in Fosu, so its impossible Neymar would get the 11 shirt, unless it was sanctioned by the Football League to change Fosus number8 -
we're you in the Jonny Williams picture?stockportaddick said:
I was in the posh bit on new years day (centre circle) and began to think I'd been mistaken for a stinking rich potential buyer and was the cause of all this latest takeover frenzy. It's about as close as I'll ever get to being stinking richnth london addick said:Good match to be in the posh seats tomorrow at then
0 -
The bottom line is that I will never ever forget and never ever forgive that gutless old fart or that spineless harlot for the hurt or pain they have caused me and all us Charlton fans over the last five years and tearing up and destroying all the good work Chrissy Powell did to try and get us to be a competitive Championship club. Never ever!30
-
so who might the backer be. all links mid 30s. the only likely one seems that joel McDonald. who else could it be0
-
-
No, thankfully I was sat just a bit further back. Never been one for the limelight!superclive said:
we're you in the Jonny Williams picture?stockportaddick said:
I was in the posh bit on new years day (centre circle) and began to think I'd been mistaken for a stinking rich potential buyer and was the cause of all this latest takeover frenzy. It's about as close as I'll ever get to being stinking richnth london addick said:Good match to be in the posh seats tomorrow at then
1 -
Too soon?
19 -
Don't tempt fate!4
-
Thanks for reminding me of Karel Fraeyes reign. Baffling how he got the job0
- Sponsored links:
-
But will the boycotters return???JoshAddick said:0 -
This is the sole reason why I didnt boycott - After five years of having something else to do with my Saturday afternoon I probably wouldnt so didnt want to run the risk.WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
But will the boycotters return???JoshAddick said:2 -
Never understand it and never will, you support the club through thick and thin regardless. How a billionaire will lose sleep over someone’s 250 quid escapes me.Lets be honest he dug his heels in for five yearsForeverAddickted said:
This is the sole reason why I didnt boycott - After five years of having something else to do I probably wouldnt so didnt want to run the riskWhenIwasLittleBoy said:
But will the boycotters return???JoshAddick said:11 -
My monies on him, not the richest mind yousuperclive said:so who might the backer be. all links mid 30s. the only likely one seems that joel McDonald. who else could it be
0 -
True but they've equally stood by something they believe in and you could argue that by boycotting they've helped speed up the sale - Roland is so rich that £250 dont matter if he receives it or not but he's gotten rich by making every penny he can so will always appreciate every penny he gets!!WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
Never understand it and never will, you support the club through thick and thin regardless. How a billionaire will lose sleep over someone’s 250 quid escapes me.Lets be honest he dug his heels in for five yearsForeverAddickted said:
This is the sole reason why I didnt boycott - After five years of having something else to do I probably wouldnt so didnt want to run the riskWhenIwasLittleBoy said:
But will the boycotters return???JoshAddick said:4 -
If you see an owner who you believe is destroying the club you love, it is hard to put money in his pocket. Yes, he may not lose any sleep over your money, but it does have a collective power in reminding him what a failure he is amongst other things. And this may or may not help him decide it isn't worth it in the end.17
-
Protests and boycotts can be personal, too. It might be the principle of not giving money to a figure you don't support, rather than necessarily directly looking to hurt RD. Perhaps swing voting is a serviceable analogy - vote for what you stand for et al.WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
Never understand it and never will, you support the club through thick and thin regardless. How a billionaire will lose sleep over someone’s 250 quid escapes me.Lets be honest he dug his heels in for five yearsForeverAddickted said:
This is the sole reason why I didnt boycott - After five years of having something else to do I probably wouldnt so didnt want to run the riskWhenIwasLittleBoy said:
But will the boycotters return???JoshAddick said:9 -
But can you get moments back in life by being stubborn. ? He must have done something right life to get the wealth he has,let’s be honest people were doing cartwheels when he bought us and found out his wealth.ForeverAddickted said:
True but they've equally stood by something they believe in and you could argue that by boycotting they've helped speed up the sale - Roland is so rich that £250 dont matter if he receives it or not but he's gotten rich by making every penny he can so will always appreciate every penny he gets!!WhenIwasLittleBoy said:
Never understand it and never will, you support the club through thick and thin regardless. How a billionaire will lose sleep over someone’s 250 quid escapes me.Lets be honest he dug his heels in for five yearsForeverAddickted said:
This is the sole reason why I didnt boycott - After five years of having something else to do I probably wouldnt so didnt want to run the riskWhenIwasLittleBoy said:
But will the boycotters return???JoshAddick said:3 -
Would Richard Murray sell his stake to the Aussies as well then?Nug said:Too soon?
2 -
He hasn’t got a stake.AddickFC81 said:
Would Richard Murray sell his stake to the Aussies as well then?Nug said:Too soon?
0
This discussion has been closed.
