Players Marks: Charlton v Southend

Phillips: 6
Solly: 6
Bielik: 6
Sarr: 7
Purrington: 6
Cullen: 7
Reeves: 7
Williams: 8
Fosu: 6
Marshall: 6
Vetokele: 5
Parker: 7
Referee: 8

Phillips: 6 nearly gave them a goal by not coming for a bouncing ball. Following on for his mistake at heading a ball to Ched Evans last week I would change next week.

Solly: 6 Good on 1-1, but 1st touch on so many passes was embarrassingly poor. Never going past a player. I think Dyksteel is better.
Bielik: 7.5 dealt with everything that came his way.
Sarr: 9.5 would have been 10 if that shot had gone in! 
Purrington: 6 Solid. Pleased with that.
Cullen: 8 ran the show
Reeves: 7 good goal. Pity he was taken off.
Williams: 6.5
Fosu: 4 beat his player so superbly in the first half, and then tried to do it again instead of passing. The sort of decision making that says you will never make it?
Marshall: 4 If you get near the goal line, cut it back, not take a shot. If you can’t get that bit right, give up. We had two waiting for a tap in. Poor.
Vetokele: 6 We need the midfield to be a bit braver with their passing. You have to see the run, and then play the ball. If you can’t deliver you have reached your level. Blame them more than Veto.
Parker: 7 Quite impressed. Good runs, got to some great headers. Would be my choice to play with Taylor. Didn’t think I would be saying that.
Referee: 9 got nearly everything right. Did think he was not robust enough at dealing with their time wasting.

Oh, and Reco. Hit the bloody target!

Phillips: 8 done real well not at fault for thier goal
Solly: 7 simply Solly 
Bielik: 7 good CB
Sarr: 9.5 MoM again 
Purrington: 7 wish Henry would’ve passed the ball to me
Cullen: 7 game In holding roll
Reeves: 7 should not have been taken off not the best first half
Williams: 7 thought we should just keep giving him the ball
Fosu: 3 poor Henry really Poor
Marshall: 1 worst game he played can’t cross the ball for toffee
Vetokele: 5 no impact
Parker: 7 should have started 
Referee: 2 really piss poor

Hackett-Fairchild: n/a should have won it
Lapslie: n/a

Phillips:   5
Solly:   6
Bielik:   6
Sarr:   7
Purrington:   6
Cullen:  7 
Reeves:   7
Williams:  8
Fosu:  5
Marshall:   5.5
Vetokele:  5 
Parker:   6
Referee:  5     

Phillips: 5
Solly: 5
Bielik: 7
Sarr: 9
Purrington: 6
Cullen: 5
Reeves: 7
Williams: 8
Fosu: 1
Marshall: 3
Vetokele: 4
Parker: 7
Referee: 6

Phillips:  6
Solly:  6
Bielik:  7
Sarr:  8
Purrington:  7
Cullen:  7.5
Reeves:  7.5
Williams:  6.5
Fosu:  4
Marshall:  5
Vetokele:  5
Parker:  6.5
Referee:  6

1StevieG said:

Phillips: 6
Solly: 6
Bielik: 6
Sarr: 7
Purrington: 6
Cullen: 7
Reeves: 7
Williams: 8
Fosu: 7
Marshall: 6
Vetokele: 5
Parker: 7
Referee: 8

Fosu above 
Phillips, Solly, Bielik, Purrington and Igor

Fosu the same as
Sarr, Cullen, Reeves and Parker.

What f ing game were u watching

Phillips: 7 Unlucky with the goal, good saves late on
Solly: 7 Usual steady performance
Bielik: 7 Always looking to come forward
Sarr: 8 Looking more and more assured.
Purrington: 7 Steady performance.
Cullen: 7.5 Always busy, works very hard./
Reeves: 6.5 Quietish performance, extra half point for the goal.
Williams:8.5 MOM Has a touch of class which stands out.
Fosu: 4 Poor. The ability's there, the football brain isn't
Marshall: 5 Got into good positions, final ball awful.
Vetokele: 4.5 Offered very little
Parker: 7 Encouraging cameo performance, likely starter next week.
Referee: 

Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
Lapslie: n/a

Phillips: 6
Solly: 6
Bielik: 6
Sarr: 8
Purrington: 6
Cullen: 7
Reeves: 5.5
Williams: 6
Fosu: 5
Marshall: 5
Vetokele: 5
Parker: 6
Referee: 3

Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
Lapslie: n/a

Phillips: 6
Solly: 5
Bielik: 7
Sarr: 8
Reeves: 7
Williams:7
Fosu:4
Marshall: 5
Vetokele:5
Parker: 7
Referee: 5

Phillips: 7
Solly: 6.5
Bielik: 6.5
Sarr: 8.5
Purrington: 6.5
Cullen: 7
Reeves: 7
Williams: 6.5
Fosu: 4
Marshall: 5
Vetokele: 5
Parker: 6.5
Referee: 6

Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
Lapslie: n/a

Phillips: 7
Solly: 6
Bielik: 6
Sarr: 8
Purring ton6: 
Cullen: 6
Reeves: 7
Williams:7
Fosu:3
Marshall: 5
Vetokele 3
Parker7: 

Phillips: 7 - made a couple of very important blocks and saves at the end, unlucky with the goal.
Solly: 6 - should've been played in numerous times in the first half, but we moved the ball too slow. Should've been on the right of the three second half.
Bielik: 5.5 - nearly scored but showing his inexperience and potentially playing in midfield has not benefited him with his decision making, takes far too many touches. Now misses two games.
Sarr: 8 - best player on the pitch. He is fast becoming a fan favourite.
Purrington: 5 - can't give more than that as he only played first half where he done okay but he isn't Page who would've suited us far better when they went down to 10.
Cullen: 6.5 - kept us ticking over well but doesn't offer much going forward. I know that wasn't his job but even his delivery yesterday was poor.
Reeves: 7 - okay first half but really needs to take on board what Bows and Jacko are telling him, better in the second half, a good header, and I thought he should've stayed on. 
Williams: 6.5 - holds onto the ball for a long time but he is a very good player, wrap him up in cotton wool as he is getting kicked so much.
Fosu: 2 - waste of time so not wasting my time writing how poor he was yesterday.
Marshall: 5 - out of position for a lot of the game but it was worth a go, he was unlucky to come off I feel and it was a good assist.
Vetokele: 5.5 - good to see him get 90 minutes, looked sharper than I thought he would be and probably should've scored at one point, service to him was poor and tempo of our play didn't help his game.
Parker: 6 - only other decent option on the bench that we had going forward. Played okay but hope there is much more to come.

Referee: 6 - correct decision to send their man off. Reeves' booking was not a yellow, otherwise he was fair.

Phillips: 7

Solly: 6

Bielik: 6

Sarr: 8

Purrington: 6

Cullen: 7

Reeves: 7

Williams: 7

Fosu: 4

Marshall: 6

Vetokele: 6

Parker: 7

Referee: 6