Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
STATBANK: Charlton Athletic 3-1 Stoke City
lancashire lad
Posts: 15,626
many thanks to the 109 Lifers who gave marks
16
Comments
-
Great stuff. Like the look of the form table! Gets better each season.
0 -
Wasn't Leko's a through ball? What are the requirements of a through ball?0
-
Very disciplined performance by the back 4, just the 1 foul between them1
-
Think its unfair that we couldn't give Chuks a mark. According to your stats he played 25 mins - surely that long enough to get a score (which he did btw). Say a player comes on for the last 20 mins, turns the game & scores a hat trick.
1 -
As usual LL, very interesting and informative tables. Thank you from a fan who rarely sees the games and that relies on these to know what is going on with each player3
-
Part of the stats is comparison with previous seasons and we have always used 30 mins as the basis for marks, to change it would negate season comparisonsgolfaddick said:Think its unfair that we couldn't give Chuks a mark. According to your stats he played 25 mins - surely that long enough to get a score (which he did btw). Say a player comes on for the last 20 mins, turns the game & scores a hat trick.
By your argument if a player comes on for the last 10 mins and scores a hat trick we should reduce the limit to 10 mins
A limit needs to be used to give a reasonably period for assessment which is 30 mins which will remain
4 -
I'd have called that a diagonal cross.harveys_gardener said:Wasn't Leko's a through ball? What are the requirements of a through ball?0 -
I'll leave you guys to decide and I'll just put the stats up as I get them from a web siteDazzler21 said:
I'd have called that a diagonal cross.harveys_gardener said:Wasn't Leko's a through ball? What are the requirements of a through ball?2 -
Agree with what you're doing Lancs.
Great work again btw.5 -
No problem. Lancashire Lad. Wasnt sure what the actual playing time was.lancashire lad said:
Part of the stats is comparison with previous seasons and we have always used 30 mins as the basis for marks, to change it would negate season comparisonsgolfaddick said:Think its unfair that we couldn't give Chuks a mark. According to your stats he played 25 mins - surely that long enough to get a score (which he did btw). Say a player comes on for the last 20 mins, turns the game & scores a hat trick.
By your argument if a player comes on for the last 10 mins and scores a hat trick we should reduce the limit to 10 mins
A limit needs to be used to give a reasonably period for assessment which is 30 mins which will remain2 - Sponsored links:
-
How about a minimum of 30m or three goals / penalty saves to get a mark? Both of those are incredibly unlikely in under 30m but would surely rate a 10.golfaddick said:
No problem. Lancashire Lad. Wasnt sure what the actual playing time was.lancashire lad said:
Part of the stats is comparison with previous seasons and we have always used 30 mins as the basis for marks, to change it would negate season comparisonsgolfaddick said:Think its unfair that we couldn't give Chuks a mark. According to your stats he played 25 mins - surely that long enough to get a score (which he did btw). Say a player comes on for the last 20 mins, turns the game & scores a hat trick.
By your argument if a player comes on for the last 10 mins and scores a hat trick we should reduce the limit to 10 mins
A limit needs to be used to give a reasonably period for assessment which is 30 mins which will remain2 -
The one thing that's annoying me with this table ''Jon Williams'' it's Jonny to us! haha
Good work though mate, and interesting to see
1 -
Dr C - when Williams joined last year he was referred to as Jon so that is why I use it but I'm quite happy to use Jonny in future even if the OS calls him Jonathan which sounds a bit not him, yes Jonny it will be as it reminds me of Jonny Robinson
1
