Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
AFKABartram said:Obviously I understand everything but for the benefit of those not as intelligent as me, could someone kindly explain what exactly has happened / been confirmed today?2
-
I’m calling for a two week extension, it could be crucial.9
-
I wonder how long it will be before the next takeover thread!0
-
SouthLincsAddick said:I’m calling for a two week extension, it could be crucial.1
-
Bolderhumphreyreid said:SouthLincsAddick said:I’m calling for a two week extension, it could be crucial.
4 -
-
Like all the best American TV series. Comes to an end, but does it? Leaves you guessing. Will there be a second season? 'Kin hope not!0
-
Alwaysneil said:Covered End said:So ESI now own the Leaseholds of The Valley & Training ground as we had assumed.
Starprix have an outstanding loan to ESI which is secured by a debenture.
If my lifetime of banking serves me well, that debenture is a second charge, which ranks behind the first charge, director's debenture(s).
Presumably, ESI repay the loan when purchasing the freehold.0 -
Missing you, and you haven't gone yet.0
-
don't think the thread should close until ESI own us lock, stock and barrel.
9 - Sponsored links:
-
AFKABartram said:Obviously I understand everything but for the benefit of those not as intelligent as me, could someone kindly explain what exactly has happened / been confirmed today?1
-
Cafc43v3r said:AFKABartram said:Obviously I understand everything but for the benefit of those not as intelligent as me, could someone kindly explain what exactly has happened / been confirmed today?
It was never going to be 100% done until the later freehold purchases, which have been well discussed. What is new today?0 -
Stand up to extend the thread....
2 -
AFKABartram said:Cafc43v3r said:AFKABartram said:Obviously I understand everything but for the benefit of those not as intelligent as me, could someone kindly explain what exactly has happened / been confirmed today?
It was never going to be 100% done until the later freehold purchases, which have been well discussed. What is new today?0 -
I think it should be left to @Grapevine49 to do a last final summarising post and then just closed for posterity.
2 -
AFKABartram said:Cafc43v3r said:AFKABartram said:Obviously I understand everything but for the benefit of those not as intelligent as me, could someone kindly explain what exactly has happened / been confirmed today?
It was never going to be 100% done until the later freehold purchases, which have been well discussed. What is new today?
How is it legally valid if it contradicts the exdirectors loans?
Of course this isn't a problem if they have been paid up, or given written permission, but @Airman Brown is saying he knows they haven't.
1 -
Cafc43v3r said:AFKABartram said:Cafc43v3r said:AFKABartram said:Obviously I understand everything but for the benefit of those not as intelligent as me, could someone kindly explain what exactly has happened / been confirmed today?
It was never going to be 100% done until the later freehold purchases, which have been well discussed. What is new today?
How is it legally valid if it contradicts the exdirectors loans?
Of course this isn't a problem if they have been paid up, or given written permission, but @Airman Brown is saying he knows they haven't.
If there is no change to the status of the 'directors' loans' why would written permission be necessary?
2 -
Horsfield9 said:I think it should be left to @Grapevine49 to do a last final summarising post and then just closed for posterity.10
-
Redvalleyeast said:Horsfield9 said:I think it should be left to @Grapevine49 to do a last final summarising post and then just closed for posterity.1
- Sponsored links:
-
Not sure if it has been mentioned elsewhere but, Companies House has been updated -
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/01788466/officers
0 -
LenGlover said:Cafc43v3r said:AFKABartram said:Cafc43v3r said:AFKABartram said:Obviously I understand everything but for the benefit of those not as intelligent as me, could someone kindly explain what exactly has happened / been confirmed today?
It was never going to be 100% done until the later freehold purchases, which have been well discussed. What is new today?
How is it legally valid if it contradicts the exdirectors loans?
Of course this isn't a problem if they have been paid up, or given written permission, but @Airman Brown is saying he knows they haven't.
If there is no change to the status of the 'directors' loans' why would written permission be necessary?
I'm thinking that if we took a 2nd charge (which I think Staprix have done), you had to give notice to the holder of the 1st charge(s).
So in this case Staprix should give notice to the ex-directors that they have taken a 2nd charge.
If the security needed to be relied upon the ex-directors would be paid before Staprix.
You couldn't give notice until the 2nd charge had actually been registered, so the notices should be received in due course.
However, it looks like the document is calling this a 1st charge and they are calling the ex-director loans Permitted Encumbrances.0 -
who is Tahnoon AL NASIRAT?
0 -
LargeAddick said:who is Tahnoon AL NASIRAT?0
-
Guess who in the Grey
3 -
Great , clear as mud then !!!!!0
-
LenGlover said:Cafc43v3r said:AFKABartram said:Cafc43v3r said:AFKABartram said:Obviously I understand everything but for the benefit of those not as intelligent as me, could someone kindly explain what exactly has happened / been confirmed today?
It was never going to be 100% done until the later freehold purchases, which have been well discussed. What is new today?
How is it legally valid if it contradicts the exdirectors loans?
Of course this isn't a problem if they have been paid up, or given written permission, but @Airman Brown is saying he knows they haven't.
If there is no change to the status of the 'directors' loans' why would written permission be necessary?2 -
Good fucking riddance to the thread I say . 😛1
-
Arabic names are very complex & they are subject to all sorts of regional / national variations. If anybody is interested, fill your boots with this:
https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/wp-content/uploads/v28n1p020-021.pdf
0 -
We have come on here to say goodbye to a legend and some CL members are showing no respect by talking shop over the body.
Has anyone seen what spread AFKA has arranged ? And I'm not talking Vanessa Feltz. (AFKA will explain !)2
This discussion has been closed.