Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Possibly NDA?KentishAddick said:
It's a shame PM couldn't provide their own evidence that a deal with TS is close to being completed. Why are they relying on evidence from PE to support their claim?Covered End said:1 -
Maybe because the deal is with Roland?KentishAddick said:I genuinely don't understand why PM didn't put forward a statement from either MM or TS saying they're in negotiations and a deal is close/agreed. The confidentiality argument is bs as the statement wouldn't have to go into detail about the deal.
1 -
Boom.i_b_b_o_r_g said:LK: Injunction was sought on basis that sale was imminent, but applicant then seeks to say that there is no evidence for it. Trying to have it both ways.0 -
Goal.i_b_b_o_r_g said:LK: Injunction was sought on basis that sale was imminent, but applicant then seeks to say that there is no evidence for it. Trying to have it both ways.0 -
Perfect.i_b_b_o_r_g said:LK: Injunction was sought on basis that sale was imminent, but applicant then seeks to say that there is no evidence for it. Trying to have it both ways.0 -
LJ Males says that court has no idea what current circumstances are, so would struggle to know if there had been changes if there was an application to vary a conditional injunction that it granted today.0
-
LK just scored a hattrick1
-
Sponsored links:
-
But who for Chris Kammra?iamdan said:
Goal.i_b_b_o_r_g said:LK: Injunction was sought on basis that sale was imminent, but applicant then seeks to say that there is no evidence for it. Trying to have it both ways.7 -
The statement wouldn't have to go into detail. TS has already stated to the media that he is 99% certain of doing a deal.stoneroses19 said:
Possibly NDA?KentishAddick said:
It's a shame PM couldn't provide their own evidence that a deal with TS is close to being completed. Why are they relying on evidence from PE to support their claim?Covered End said:0 -
Depends if the Judges agree with that... That wasnt part of the initial decision behind Judge Pearce refusing an injunction until November0
-
It's fair to say the judges aren't massive fans of the evidence PM have provided
0 -
LJ Lewison asks if PM is prepared to freeze proceeds of sale to protect interests of LD at trial. LK says options are open for LD to apply for that.0
-
That should be that.Covered End said:0 -
Fml. Why didn’t we just provide a statement that says a deal is close???
Wait. Is it because we’re waiting on the EFL? 🤨2 -
Be happy with thati_b_b_o_r_g said:LJ Lewison asks if PM is prepared to freeze proceeds of sale to protect interests of LD at trial. LK says options are open for LD to apply for that.3 -
Sponsored links:
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:LJ Lewison asks about liberty to vary any injunction if PK was "oven-ready" deal on table. LK says court already has evidence from Elliott on this point about press releases showing Thomas Sandgaard's intention to take over ESI.
OG from Elliott, 3-2 to LK1 -
Surely a judge can understand this. Kreamer can’t just come out with what TS has offered in a court hearing that is being broadcasted all over Twitter.Covered End said:0 -
But what if ESI are only getting £1?i_b_b_o_r_g said:LJ Lewison asks if PM is prepared to freeze proceeds of sale to protect interests of LD at trial. LK says options are open for LD to apply for that.
Does that one pound get frozen to protect the interests of LD2 -
Just do this. That way the club can be sold and these charlatans can fight over the money at a later datei_b_b_o_r_g said:LJ Lewison asks if PM is prepared to freeze proceeds of sale to protect interests of LD at trial. LK says options are open for LD to apply for that.4 -
Kreamer seems to be doing a good job here, reading between the lines.2
-
This would surely be the best thing. Let a sale go through and let them fight over it.i_b_b_o_r_g said:LJ Lewison asks if PM is prepared to freeze proceeds of sale to protect interests of LD at trial. LK says options are open for LD to apply for that.5 -
TS pays Panorama £X for the club. Deposits it in a separate frozen account. Panorama and Lex can fight for it in November
That would seem a sensible outcome...26
This discussion has been closed.
