LJ Males asking why we have to rely on tweets and press releases instead of Kreamer’s client just telling us the situation of a takeover.
Kreamer says confidentiality is the reason for that.
#cafc
It's a shame PM couldn't provide their own evidence that a deal with TS is close to being completed. Why are they relying on evidence from PE to support their claim?
LJ Lewison asks about liberty to vary any injunction if PK was "oven-ready" deal on table. LK says court already has evidence from Elliott on this point about press releases showing Thomas Sandgaard's intention to take over ESI.
LK: Injunction was sought on basis that sale was imminent, but applicant then seeks to say that there is no evidence for it. Trying to have it both ways.
I genuinely don't understand why PM didn't put forward a statement from either MM or TS saying they're in negotiations and a deal is close/agreed. The confidentiality argument is bs as the statement wouldn't have to go into detail about the deal.
LJ Males asks why court is forced to rely on "rather unreliable" evidence from journalists and not from the respondent.
Oh so its alright for Chaisty to use it against Pearce then but not for us to use it today then!!
If the value of the evidence has been downgraded I will be fuuuuuming
I guess you could look at it as Chaisty HAD to use that as no one at the club would help him, but here representing MM we could have given more substantive evidence. But that would be immensely frustrating.
Comments
I agree, why is our evidence Sky Sports conjecture?
We will be quoting Alan Nixon in a minute.
No one's gut feeling was good after the Naby and Dillon horror OG at Wembley.
Just let this play out and hope that we get a positive result.
I guess you could look at it as Chaisty HAD to use that as no one at the club would help him, but here representing MM we could have given more substantive evidence. But that would be immensely frustrating.