Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1158159161163164175

Comments

  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,376
    Arrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhh
  • Balls!!!!!
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,454
    "Hard to see how grant if injunction would put the club at further risk."

    "No explanation of how embargoes would be lifted if the injunction is refused. "

    THEY'D BE FREE TO SELL IT TO SOMEONE WHO IS LEGITIMATE AND WEALTHY ENOUGH TO PASS THE EFL TESTS.

    OK, MM's evidence is crap but what's so hard to figure out Judges?
    The problem is that none of PM's evidence says that. The judges weigh up the evidence before them. PM have failed to produce even the most basic explanation of why an embargo is bad, why we need a new owner, how LD not having anybody who's passed EFL tests will lead to further punishments, that TS is on the verge of buying, etc.

    PM have royally fucked this and presumably LK would have been begging them for evidence to help her, so we can only assume they've fucked it deliberately. The question is why, I can't see why they'd bother going to court if they didn't want to win.
  • FishCostaFortune
    FishCostaFortune Posts: 10,773
    edited September 2020
    What. A. Load. Of. Shit.

    Will Charlton even exist as a club by November if PE is allowed to be in charge?
  • BigRedEvil
    BigRedEvil Posts: 11,071
    Only at Charlton would the original judges decision be overturned. Fed up with it all 
  • So what about all this 'done deal' stuff we heard last week then?  Essentially we cannot be sold by ESI until they figure out who actually owns it - version 1 or version 2.
  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,484
    Don't know whether to laugh or cry. Unbelievable what this club has gone and continues to go through. 
  • is tommy worried yet?

  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,376
    Surely we can appeal their injunction or get an injunction against their injunction, and then appeal when they try to get an injunction against our injunction injunction? Seems to be how this works.
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486
    So presumably if the EFL had just rejected the OADT appeal then the Judge would have proof that the club was in danger of going out of business?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Nice knowing you all
  • Great fucking job by the pricks at ESI/Panorama. Couldn't even be bothered to supply any evidence to support their claims. Fucking hell.
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    Who said this could never happen?

    Even our legal 'in the knowers' know fu*k all!!
  • To be honest, based on what was said during the appeal today, I agree with the verdict

    Panorama's case was pretty awful
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,258
    And to think with the first judge we were really bloody close to him sodding LD off entirely
  • LOLZ.

    Don't worry though guys, this court case has nothing to do with TS being able to take over the club. etc etc....

    Only if neither ES1 or ES2 own the club
  • CharltonByBlood
    CharltonByBlood Posts: 1,900
    edited September 2020
    It's time for this great timing TS has that has been claimed
  • ct_addick
    ct_addick Posts: 4,333
    Another kick in the balls supporting this club.....fed up with it all
  • Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck......Shitty weasel looking twat.....just leave this club alone!! You aint wanted so get fucked!
  • Sponsored links:



  • kentred2
    kentred2 Posts: 2,335

    Panorama legal team had a shocker. 
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,331
    Fuck. 

    It went against us in a fair and open court hearing and appealed in the highest court of appeal in the country, in public.  Everything was above board and in the open.  It went the wrong way, but no-one can say the system failed. The judge wasn't to blame.   The lawyers weren't to blame.  The appeal court judges weren't to blame. What failed Charlton - yet again - was the machinations, collusion and deceit of unpalatable, inappropriate owners.  We got stiffed, but we will come out of this, somehow.  

    So far, the bad guys are winning.  But they won't win in the end.  So it's not yet the end. 

    Still... fuck.
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    colthe3rd said:
    So presumably if the EFL had just rejected the OADT appeal then the Judge would have proof that the club was in danger of going out of business?
    I think so. Because the future of the football club wouldn't be in doubt.

    The EFL would not be able to stop Elliott owning us if he won the November trial. But the court today would have the evidence required that the club's future was in doubt (i.e. how can it not be if it's owned by someone the EFL will not let own it and play under their rules). 
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,824
    Gutted. Absolutely gutted.

    the saddest thing of all is having heard the evidence I don’t see how they could have found another verdict. 
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561

    Wow......just, wow. I bloody told you that our defence failed to present a single scrap of factual evidence to support their 'fears' about the impact on the club. They failed the first time round and failed to learn from their mistake this time. Where is the 'whatever' from the EFL about the embargo, the OADT updated position etc? Where is the statement about/from TS that he is ready to go but will talk away if delayed and place the club at risk? All/any of that would have made a difference to the outcome.

    It's a joke.

  • ProperCharlton
    ProperCharlton Posts: 2,254
    edited September 2020
    is tommy worried yet?

    Not in the slightest 
    He must have one hell of a plan. I think it's time to reveal it.
  • Terrible case from PM. Poor evidence given. 
  • cafc_se7
    cafc_se7 Posts: 2,274
    is tommy worried yet?

    Not in the slightest 
    How do you know this though bud?
  • is tommy worried yet?

    Not in the slightest 
    dont i cant take this anymore. stop the train i want to get off. 
This discussion has been closed.