Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Arrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhh1
-
Balls!!!!!0
-
The problem is that none of PM's evidence says that. The judges weigh up the evidence before them. PM have failed to produce even the most basic explanation of why an embargo is bad, why we need a new owner, how LD not having anybody who's passed EFL tests will lead to further punishments, that TS is on the verge of buying, etc.PeanutsMolloy said:"Hard to see how grant if injunction would put the club at further risk."
"No explanation of how embargoes would be lifted if the injunction is refused. "
THEY'D BE FREE TO SELL IT TO SOMEONE WHO IS LEGITIMATE AND WEALTHY ENOUGH TO PASS THE EFL TESTS.
OK, MM's evidence is crap but what's so hard to figure out Judges?
PM have royally fucked this and presumably LK would have been begging them for evidence to help her, so we can only assume they've fucked it deliberately. The question is why, I can't see why they'd bother going to court if they didn't want to win.9 -
What. A. Load. Of. Shit.
Will Charlton even exist as a club by November if PE is allowed to be in charge?0 -
Only at Charlton would the original judges decision be overturned. Fed up with it all5
-
So what about all this 'done deal' stuff we heard last week then? Essentially we cannot be sold by ESI until they figure out who actually owns it - version 1 or version 2.
5 -
Don't know whether to laugh or cry. Unbelievable what this club has gone and continues to go through.5
-
is tommy worried yet?
0 -
Surely we can appeal their injunction or get an injunction against their injunction, and then appeal when they try to get an injunction against our injunction injunction? Seems to be how this works.5
-
So presumably if the EFL had just rejected the OADT appeal then the Judge would have proof that the club was in danger of going out of business?4
- Sponsored links:
-
I cannot believe the swing from the first case.
EFL, you cannot sit and wait until November 23rd.22 -
Nice knowing you all0
-
Great fucking job by the pricks at ESI/Panorama. Couldn't even be bothered to supply any evidence to support their claims. Fucking hell.5
-
Who said this could never happen?
Even our legal 'in the knowers' know fu*k all!!1 -
To be honest, based on what was said during the appeal today, I agree with the verdict
Panorama's case was pretty awful14 -
And to think with the first judge we were really bloody close to him sodding LD off entirely1
-
FishCostaFortune said:LOLZ.
Don't worry though guys, this court case has nothing to do with TS being able to take over the club. etc etc....
Only if neither ES1 or ES2 own the club0 -
It's time for this great timing TS has that has been claimed4
-
Another kick in the balls supporting this club.....fed up with it all0
-
Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck......Shitty weasel looking twat.....just leave this club alone!! You aint wanted so get fucked!3
- Sponsored links:
-
Not in the slightestTodds_right_hook said:is tommy worried yet?32 -
Panorama legal team had a shocker.1 -
Fuck.
It went against us in a fair and open court hearing and appealed in the highest court of appeal in the country, in public. Everything was above board and in the open. It went the wrong way, but no-one can say the system failed. The judge wasn't to blame. The lawyers weren't to blame. The appeal court judges weren't to blame. What failed Charlton - yet again - was the machinations, collusion and deceit of unpalatable, inappropriate owners. We got stiffed, but we will come out of this, somehow.
So far, the bad guys are winning. But they won't win in the end. So it's not yet the end.
Still... fuck.16 -
I think so. Because the future of the football club wouldn't be in doubt.colthe3rd said:So presumably if the EFL had just rejected the OADT appeal then the Judge would have proof that the club was in danger of going out of business?
The EFL would not be able to stop Elliott owning us if he won the November trial. But the court today would have the evidence required that the club's future was in doubt (i.e. how can it not be if it's owned by someone the EFL will not let own it and play under their rules).0 -
Gutted. Absolutely gutted.
the saddest thing of all is having heard the evidence I don’t see how they could have found another verdict.19 -
Wow......just, wow. I bloody told you that our defence failed to present a single scrap of factual evidence to support their 'fears' about the impact on the club. They failed the first time round and failed to learn from their mistake this time. Where is the 'whatever' from the EFL about the embargo, the OADT updated position etc? Where is the statement about/from TS that he is ready to go but will talk away if delayed and place the club at risk? All/any of that would have made a difference to the outcome.
It's a joke.
3 -
He must have one hell of a plan. I think it's time to reveal it.flyingkiwiDK said:
Not in the slightestTodds_right_hook said:is tommy worried yet?6 -
Terrible case from PM. Poor evidence given.5
-
How do you know this though bud?flyingkiwiDK said:
Not in the slightestTodds_right_hook said:is tommy worried yet?3 -
dont i cant take this anymore. stop the train i want to get off.flyingkiwiDK said:
Not in the slightestTodds_right_hook said:is tommy worried yet?6
This discussion has been closed.
