Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Marcus Rashford launches petition to urge immediate Government action on child poverty
Comments
-
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-54642788
I agree with a lot of what The Princess says. However these are exceptional times when children of 'hard working families' as well as the wasteful and feckless might well need extra help, especially if both parents are at work during school holidays. Free meals for children under (say) 15/16 should be provided until the pandemic eases or a vaccine is developed.
The Cameron government was in favour of some free meals for children, whatever happened to that policy ?
EDIT .. The answer to the 'Cameron question' .. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/government-quietly-ends-free-school-meal-grants-nearly-3-000-primary-schools-a6862386.html0 -
I'm fairly sure Infant children, so up to and including year two get free school meals.0
-
Disgraceful decision from Tory MPs. What a cruel, petty, little country we are becoming.15
-
1
-
In response to the decision in Parliament yesterday Marcus Rashford has tweeted “ Put aside all the noise, the digs, the party politics, and let’s focus on the reality. A significant number of children are going to bed tonight not only hungry but feeling like they do not matter because of comments that have been made today.”7
-
Farage was against the EU, he was never, so far as I know, in favour of starving British children to death. And btw, I voted BrexitYTS1978 said:0 -
Frankly it's utterly disgraceful what this government has said and done on the subject. I'm also disgusted at the people who have been commenting on Farage's twitter criticising him for his statement, or anyone who has expressed similar sentiments.
As an interesting aside (as Farage was brought up), I was up in town earlier and overheard someone who was very vocal during the whole Brexit campaign that we should be "taking care of our own" and that is why he was voting out. Considering these childern are "our own", today he was being very vocal that we shouldn't be helping them out as it's not our job. I guess it never really was about "our own" was it?
We like to pretend we aren't as f*cked up as the USA on things like this, but let's be honest we are just behind the curve.12 -
#endchildfoodpoverty is not about children going hungry during the school holidays, this is about children going hungry full stop. Let’s not loose sight of the bigger picture here. There are at least 1.5million children we are not reaching with the free school meal scheme... (1)2 -
.
0 -
"I don't have the education of a politician... but I have a social education having lived through this,"
"These children matter... and for as long as they don't have a voice, they will have mine."
Marcus Rashford. MBE.
19 - Sponsored links:
-
A Tory MP has quit her government job after voting for a Labour motion to offer free school meals during holidays until Easter 2021.
Caroline Ansell said vouchers were not a long-term solution - but they helped families struggling with the pandemic.
Explaining her decision, she said: "In these unprecedented times I am very concerned to be doing all we can to help lower income families and their children who are really struggling due to the impact of the virus."
She said that food vouchers were "not perfect" arguing that it is better to link meals to activities so children "can also benefit from extra-curricular learning and experience".
However. she added that vouchers could help families in her Eastbourne constituency who were struggling as a result of the pandemic.
The government's stance has also been criticised by Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage, who tweeted: "If the government can subsidise Eat Out to Help Out, not being seen to give poor kids lunch in the school holidays looks mean and is wrong." BBC News
12 -
You can see the full story in the BBC news item quoted at the top of the pageHenske said:A Tory MP has quit her government job after voting for a Labour motion to offer free school meals during holidays until Easter 2021.Caroline Ansell said vouchers were not a long-term solution - but they helped families struggling with the pandemic.
Explaining her decision, she said: "In these unprecedented times I am very concerned to be doing all we can to help lower income families and their children who are really struggling due to the impact of the virus."
She said that food vouchers were "not perfect" arguing that it is better to link meals to activities so children "can also benefit from extra-curricular learning and experience".
However. she added that vouchers could help families in her Eastbourne constituency who were struggling as a result of the pandemic.
The government's stance has also been criticised by Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage, who tweeted: "If the government can subsidise Eat Out to Help Out, not being seen to give poor kids lunch in the school holidays looks mean and is wrong." BBC News
0 -
Nice to see all is as normal with the nasty party...9
-
The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.5 -
The “eat out to help out” scheme was the biggest piece of nonsense ever.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.4 -
I don't know much about the Universal Credit system, but if the money is paid by that method, there is nothing to stop feckless parents from spending it on something else. I think that vouchers can only be spent on food, is that correct, does anyone know?
1 -
Funny how no-one ever talks about the feckless rich.
6 -
I thought the idea of the EOTHO scheme was to assist the hospitality industry. Considering that employs millions of waiting staff, chefs, kitchen porters, cleaners etc all on low income, they will have quite a struggle feeding their kids without a job.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.The way things are going at the moment it’ll cost a lot more than £20m to put food on the table across the country for everybody.
That said, I am in full support of children in need being feed 365 days a year whatever the means.2 -
There was talk of people selling vouchers. I assume that this is either a very small minority or just nonsense.ME14addick said:I don't know much about the Universal Credit system, but if the money is paid by that method, there is nothing to stop feckless parents from spending it on something else. I think that vouchers can only be spent on food, is that correct, does anyone know?
0 -
I think the EOHO scheme actually only operated for 13 days. And cost about half a million pounds.ValleyGary said:
I thought the idea of the EOTHO scheme was to assist the hospitality industry. Considering that employs millions of waiting staff, chefs, kitchen porters, cleaners etc all on low income, they will have quite a struggle feeding their kids without a job.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.The way things are going at the moment it’ll cost a lot more than £20m to put food on the table across the country for everybody.
That said, I am in full support of children in need being feed 365 days a year whatever the means.0 - Sponsored links:
-
UC you have to supply proof of any rental agreement you have in place plus thorough checks on child care. You also speak with a case manager. However you are given an allowance amount on top of that. There are no checks on your bills/credit agreements with previous lenders etc. ‘Feckless parents’ will abuse anything, that’s why their feckless. I’d imagine the majority of normal people use it as it’s intended. There is very little margin for error with UC payment if used correctly. It’s not a spend at will allowance.cafc999 said:
There was talk of people selling vouchers. I assume that this is either a very small minority or just nonsense.ME14addick said:I don't know much about the Universal Credit system, but if the money is paid by that method, there is nothing to stop feckless parents from spending it on something else. I think that vouchers can only be spent on food, is that correct, does anyone know?1 -
Million or Billion?se9addick said:
I think the EOHO scheme actually only operated for 13 days. And cost about half a million pounds.ValleyGary said:
I thought the idea of the EOTHO scheme was to assist the hospitality industry. Considering that employs millions of waiting staff, chefs, kitchen porters, cleaners etc all on low income, they will have quite a struggle feeding their kids without a job.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.The way things are going at the moment it’ll cost a lot more than £20m to put food on the table across the country for everybody.
That said, I am in full support of children in need being feed 365 days a year whatever the means.0 -
Sorry - half a billion pounds!ValleyGary said:
?se9addick said:
I think the EOHO scheme actually only operated for 13 days. And cost about half a million pounds.ValleyGary said:
I thought the idea of the EOTHO scheme was to assist the hospitality industry. Considering that employs millions of waiting staff, chefs, kitchen porters, cleaners etc all on low income, they will have quite a struggle feeding their kids without a job.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.The way things are going at the moment it’ll cost a lot more than £20m to put food on the table across the country for everybody.
That said, I am in full support of children in need being feed 365 days a year whatever the means.1 -
Half a billion not half a million and it ran from the 3rd to 31st Augustse9addick said:
I think the EOHO scheme actually only operated for 13 days. And cost about half a million pounds.ValleyGary said:
I thought the idea of the EOTHO scheme was to assist the hospitality industry. Considering that employs millions of waiting staff, chefs, kitchen porters, cleaners etc all on low income, they will have quite a struggle feeding their kids without a job.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.The way things are going at the moment it’ll cost a lot more than £20m to put food on the table across the country for everybody.
That said, I am in full support of children in need being feed 365 days a year whatever the means.0 -
But only Monday to Wednesday.Addick Addict said:
Half a billion not half a million and it ran from the 3rd to 31st Augustse9addick said:
I think the EOHO scheme actually only operated for 13 days. And cost about half a million pounds.ValleyGary said:
I thought the idea of the EOTHO scheme was to assist the hospitality industry. Considering that employs millions of waiting staff, chefs, kitchen porters, cleaners etc all on low income, they will have quite a struggle feeding their kids without a job.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.The way things are going at the moment it’ll cost a lot more than £20m to put food on the table across the country for everybody.
That said, I am in full support of children in need being feed 365 days a year whatever the means.I do know that it kept many business alive, kept many people in jobs and allowed people the get out after a lockdown (the last one only a good idea if social distancing rules followed).
Could the government have just given restaurants a further grant? Considering how many restaurants and pubs there are, then 500m wouldn’t have gone far. Plus would that money have filtered down to staffing level?Anyway, this isn’t the thread for EOTHO.2 -
Good point. At least if the Government fed the starving children from Monday to Wednesday they might only be starving for half the week!ValleyGary said:
But only Monday to WednesdayAddick Addict said:
Half a billion not half a million and it ran from the 3rd to 31st Augustse9addick said:
I think the EOHO scheme actually only operated for 13 days. And cost about half a million pounds.ValleyGary said:
I thought the idea of the EOTHO scheme was to assist the hospitality industry. Considering that employs millions of waiting staff, chefs, kitchen porters, cleaners etc all on low income, they will have quite a struggle feeding their kids without a job.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.The way things are going at the moment it’ll cost a lot more than £20m to put food on the table across the country for everybody.
That said, I am in full support of children in need being feed 365 days a year whatever the means.1 -
Fully understand and know that. The point I was making is that no matter what system is put in place some people will abuse it.ValleyGary said:
UC you have to supply proof of any rental agreement you have in place plus thorough checks on child care. You also speak with a case manager. However you are given an allowance amount on top of that. There are no checks on your bills/credit agreements with previous lenders etc. ‘Feckless parents’ will abuse anything, that’s why their feckless. I’d imagine the majority of normal people use it as it’s intended. There is very little margin for error with UC payment if used correctly. It’s not a spend at will allowance.cafc999 said:
There was talk of people selling vouchers. I assume that this is either a very small minority or just nonsense.ME14addick said:I don't know much about the Universal Credit system, but if the money is paid by that method, there is nothing to stop feckless parents from spending it on something else. I think that vouchers can only be spent on food, is that correct, does anyone know?0 -
What makes you say that? Quite a few small eating places survived and managed to keep staff employed because of that?se9addick said:
The “eat out to help out” scheme was the biggest piece of nonsense ever.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.0 -
My understanding is that this is not about cost but responsibility.Addick Addict said:
Good point. At least if the Government fed the starving children from Monday to Wednesday they might only be starving for half the week!ValleyGary said:
But only Monday to WednesdayAddick Addict said:
Half a billion not half a million and it ran from the 3rd to 31st Augustse9addick said:
I think the EOHO scheme actually only operated for 13 days. And cost about half a million pounds.ValleyGary said:
I thought the idea of the EOTHO scheme was to assist the hospitality industry. Considering that employs millions of waiting staff, chefs, kitchen porters, cleaners etc all on low income, they will have quite a struggle feeding their kids without a job.Addick Addict said:The Government spent £400 million on the "eat out to help out" scheme. How much would paying for free meals cost for starving children cost? £10m? £20m?
One thing that can be guaranteed is that more people will have contracted Covid as a result of the "eat out to help out scheme". Though more children will go hungry without the free meals.The way things are going at the moment it’ll cost a lot more than £20m to put food on the table across the country for everybody.
That said, I am in full support of children in need being feed 365 days a year whatever the means.
The government are not responsible for feeding children, their parent(s) are.
That said, there should be some way of identifying and helping truly destitute families5 -
One issue with providing free food to the most disadvantaged kids is actually getting them to eat it. My kids go to a school that has a huge amount of social issues/poverty but until Covid struck they provided excellent nutritious meals cooked on site. My daughter told me time and again that most of the food went uneaten unless it was Friday's fish/nuggets and chips as that was the only kind of food most of her peers would touch. The irony of children most in need of nutrition refusing everything bar the least nutritious food is depressing on so many levels.2
