Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Somebody out to discredit Sangaard
Comments
-
Is it alright to post a picture of Farnell's favourite after shave?

7 -
Senior mods generally prefer not to have too much stuff Members Only if it can be avoided. If you want to discuss things less openly then the Shenanigans thread is a better bet, although as membership is now open again we can't guarantee complete confidentialityeastterrace6168 said:Still not Members Only, would that not be an idea due to ongoing complexities?
2 -
Understood Ali, maybe this thread would have been better on the Shenanigans thread
to start with, as it seems to incorporate and follow a similar line.
Anyway, just an idea, and understand Mods thinking cheers.0 -
I suspect ‘Adolf Hitler’s diaries’ probably sets the bar fairly lowhoof_it_up_to_benty said:
Given the history the Times has with serious investigative journalism it's pretty sad this is the level they have now reached.eastterrace6168 said:
The reasons behind it as Fartsmell and his sick demented mind, not a lot else reallyhoof_it_up_to_benty said:It's disappointing the Times ran the article now given that the issue has been in the public domain for three years. You have to question the reasons behind it.
and the Times should be ashamed of being hoodwinked into printing this crap0



