Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
How Likely Are You To Take The Covid Vaccine?
Comments
-
.
0 -
soapboxsam said:stevexreeve said:Everyone who has the vaccine should be entered into a draw to win a Range Rover.
That should help push up the uptake.
Nearly right Steve:
Everyone who has the Vaccines, can have the knowledge they played a part in not only potentially stopping their selves being ill but most importantly, as the vast majority of us won't be sick ourselves; passing the virus on to someone who could die from the pandemic or have long-covid with complications for years to come.
Do the people demonstrating or ignoring the social distancing, not wearing masks in shops, trains and buses or outside in crowds, still not get this salient point? You may be Asymptomatic and a super spreader who has created a chain reaction and pushed the R up.
In their minds, everyone else is 'the mug' ... while they carry on oblivious.
It will happen at Christmas ... "no-one's gonna stop me seeing all six of my kids. Boris will. Why shouldn't I?"
There will already be some bright sparks from Tier 3 areas planning to get tickets for tomorrow by calling in a favour from a mate who lives in Tier 2.3 -
AddickUpNorth said:Chizz said:Don't worry. If the vaccine is vegan, it will tell you.
Over and over and over again.
Again and again and again and again.
2 -
Garrymanilow said:iainment said:Garrymanilow said:iainment said:I have changed my position on taking the vaccine to being more likely to take it, although I am still wary of long term complications.Carrying a vaccine passport is too much though. Smacks of a police state.
I don’t know what an EULA is, so don’t know if I’ve ever carried one with me.
The obsession with ID is relatively recent in this country and I’m not convinced it’s made anything better. Apart from ID providers profits.I think you've missed my point completely. I'm not saying that you carry all those things with you, the point is that you have those things, and seemingly willingly live in the environment where this happens regularly. No-one needs you to carry your house ownership with you but you've still let the state know where you live. If the police see you in your car they can run your license plate and through your insurance identify where you live. Your experience of not being ID'd in a pub is irrelevant; you still need ID if you are to be served in a pub, some places just either judge based on your appearance or don't care. I'm sure if a pub owner could tell you were vaccinated by your appearance then they wouldn't ID you, and I've no doubt that plenty of places would flout a vaccine passport rule anyway if they thought they could get away with it. Also you've actually said it yourself; when you were trying to illegally drink you were either allowed to or not. That's exactly what would be happening with a vaccine passport. All these things are just as intrusive as needing a document to be allowed to go into a shop or bar so a global pandemic can be halted, so I don't know why you think that would be going too far.2 -
ShootersHillGuru said:It doesn’t breach anything unless someone forces him to have the vaccine. Guido Fawkes is total and utter anyway so let’s move on. It’s total Guido bollox. Pilkington has never said any such thing.
People do delete tweets, you know.
Why criticise the news source for simply reporting it? It is not their fault if Pilkington's interpretation is incorrect.
Do you criticise the BBC when they report news you don't like?0 -
soapboxsam said:stevexreeve said:Everyone who has the vaccine should be entered into a draw to win a Range Rover.
That should help push up the uptake.
Nearly right Steve:
Everyone who has the Vaccines, can have the knowledge they played a part in not only potentially stopping their selves being ill but most importantly, as the vast majority of us won't be sick ourselves; passing the virus on to someone who could die from the pandemic or have long-covid with complications for years to come.
Do the people demonstrating or ignoring the social distancing, not wearing masks in shops, trains and buses or outside in crowds, still not get this salient point? You may be Asymptomatic and a super spreader who has created a chain reaction and pushed the R up.0 -
You can have a vegan 'flu vaccine.
I asked the very question when I was asked if I was allergic to eggs when I had mine last week.0 -
iainment said:Garrymanilow said:iainment said:Garrymanilow said:iainment said:I have changed my position on taking the vaccine to being more likely to take it, although I am still wary of long term complications.Carrying a vaccine passport is too much though. Smacks of a police state.
I don’t know what an EULA is, so don’t know if I’ve ever carried one with me.
The obsession with ID is relatively recent in this country and I’m not convinced it’s made anything better. Apart from ID providers profits.I think you've missed my point completely. I'm not saying that you carry all those things with you, the point is that you have those things, and seemingly willingly live in the environment where this happens regularly. No-one needs you to carry your house ownership with you but you've still let the state know where you live. If the police see you in your car they can run your license plate and through your insurance identify where you live. Your experience of not being ID'd in a pub is irrelevant; you still need ID if you are to be served in a pub, some places just either judge based on your appearance or don't care. I'm sure if a pub owner could tell you were vaccinated by your appearance then they wouldn't ID you, and I've no doubt that plenty of places would flout a vaccine passport rule anyway if they thought they could get away with it. Also you've actually said it yourself; when you were trying to illegally drink you were either allowed to or not. That's exactly what would be happening with a vaccine passport. All these things are just as intrusive as needing a document to be allowed to go into a shop or bar so a global pandemic can be halted, so I don't know why you think that would be going too far.
1 -
Dave Rudd said:Addickted said:You can have a vegan 'flu vaccine.
I asked the very question when I was asked if I was allergic to eggs when I had mine last week.
In terms of the Covid-19 vaccine, would many vegans risk death for their vegan principles?0 - Sponsored links:
-
Dave Rudd said:Addickted said:You can have a vegan 'flu vaccine.
I asked the very question when I was asked if I was allergic to eggs when I had mine last week.
In terms of the Covid-19 vaccine, would many vegans risk death for their vegan principles?2 -
If people don’t want the vaccine it really doesn’t bother me. I think they’re foolish beyond belief but the world is full of people foolish beyond belief.2
-
thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?0
-
Redrobo said:Dave Rudd said:Addickted said:You can have a vegan 'flu vaccine.
I asked the very question when I was asked if I was allergic to eggs when I had mine last week.
In terms of the Covid-19 vaccine, would many vegans risk death for their vegan principles?
Presumably it breaches my Human Rights Laws if I am killed though the beliefs of someone else?
1 -
Covered End said:thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?0
-
Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?0
-
Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?
That's OK then.0 -
Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?
That's OK then.
So if we've got 70% plus already, 2% or less vegans is not essential.
If we're only at 60% level and need another 10% at least, then 2% is important.0 -
Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?
That's OK then.
So if we've got 70% plus already, 2% or less vegans is not essential.
If we're only at 60% level and need another 10% at least, then 2% is important.11 -
Don’t like killing animals but don’t mind humans dying. That would be very we weird.
Sometimes you gotta look at the big picture guys.2 - Sponsored links:
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?
That's OK then.
So if we've got 70% plus already, 2% or less vegans is not essential.
If we're only at 60% level and need another 10% at least, then 2% is important.
I’ll pass on that thanks mate, I’ll take the needle instead.6 -
i_b_b_o_r_g said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?
That's OK then.
So if we've got 70% plus already, 2% or less vegans is not essential.
If we're only at 60% level and need another 10% at least, then 2% is important.0 -
Redrobo said:Don’t like killing animals but don’t mind humans dying. That would be very we weird.
Sometimes you gotta look at the big picture guys.
Anyhoo, to stop this going off topic I think it would be wise to divert this discussion away from the ethical beliefs of a minority of the population as Covered End rightly points out. We can always revisit it if it becomes necessary.3 -
iainment said:i_b_b_o_r_g said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?
That's OK then.
So if we've got 70% plus already, 2% or less vegans is not essential.
If we're only at 60% level and need another 10% at least, then 2% is important.3 -
i_b_b_o_r_g said:iainment said:i_b_b_o_r_g said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:Dave Rudd said:Covered End said:thewolfboy said:Got sent this. I assume it's true?
That's OK then.
So if we've got 70% plus already, 2% or less vegans is not essential.
If we're only at 60% level and need another 10% at least, then 2% is important.0 -
AddickUpNorth said:Redrobo said:Don’t like killing animals but don’t mind humans dying. That would be very we weird.
Sometimes you gotta look at the big picture guys.
Anyhoo, to stop this going off topic I think it would be wise to divert this discussion away from the ethical beliefs of a minority of the population as Covered End rightly points out. We can always revisit it if it becomes necessary.
Nice try ... but it is about acting thoughtlessly such that humans do die.
And, yes ... let's divert the discussion as you don't have sensible counter-arguments.
2% vegans in the World? Maybe. I make that about 160 million worldwide.
And it only takes one selfish, thoughtless individual to be responsible for the death of another, innocent person.
Your point is?0 -
kigelia said:Major said:Some people are going to make a bundle out of all this. Just like they do out of wars.With the China Virus, there is a 99% + survival rate, depending on age group and any pre-existing conditions.Unfortunately there are some fatalities but there are usually many more from the seasonal flu which has miraculously disappeared. It's all 'Covid' now.The top 'Expert' in the USA - Dr. Fauci is now saying that even after the vaccine, masks and social distancing will still need to be in place.The Canadian Prime Minister has just announced that 'Covid' is providing an opportunity for a societal 'Reset'.I happen to feel all this controlling of the populace has a lot more to it than our 'safety'.Just my opinion, of course, based on what I have read.Please tell me what you have read?I have no problem with people being cautious about taking the vaccine. I have a problem with people reading Ill-informed rubbish online and thinking they are an expert.I have often been concerned with free-speech as it means stupid people have it too.Funnily enough, professor, the world does not revolve around Brit bureaucrat statistics. Try looking beyond the little Island. Honestly, there is actually a world out there.Utter rubbish is a typical response. It is the reason you are so fckud up. Which Tier are you today?The Chinese don't have any.What a joke.2
-
Sorry, Being called stupid by some superior know nothing twit does not sit well with me.Back on topic, despite living in a beautiful part of the world where we are not terribly affected by the restrictions, if having a jab meant I could fly back home, see my mates, enjoy the pub and most of all, get to the Valley, stick me now.0
-
Dave Rudd said:AddickUpNorth said:Redrobo said:Don’t like killing animals but don’t mind humans dying. That would be very we weird.
Sometimes you gotta look at the big picture guys.
Anyhoo, to stop this going off topic I think it would be wise to divert this discussion away from the ethical beliefs of a minority of the population as Covered End rightly points out. We can always revisit it if it becomes necessary.
Nice try ... but it is about acting thoughtlessly such that humans do die.
And, yes ... let's divert the discussion as you don't have sensible counter-arguments.
2% vegans in the World? Maybe. I make that about 160 million worldwide.
And it only takes one selfish, thoughtless individual to be responsible for the death of another, innocent person.
Your point is?
I didn’t really have a point, I was just picking up on something another poster had implied so there was no real reason for you to butt in with such a condescending response. You prove to me, with sources, that not a single vegan will take the vaccine thus endangering the lives of others and maybe I’ll discuss it with you. Until then I have no interest in your self righteous muttering.0 -
The UK has become the first country in the world to approve the Pfizer/BioNTech coronavirus vaccine for widespread use.
British regulator, the MHRA, says the jab, which offers up to 95% protection against Covid-19 illness, is safe for roll out.
Immunisations could start within days for people in high priority groups.
The UK has already ordered 40m doses - enough to vaccinate 20m people, with two shots each.
Around 10m doses should be available soon.
0
This discussion has been closed.