Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
England Cricket 2021 (excluding Ashes)
Comments
-
Not now it won't be! I offered people a buy at 280 - no wonder there were no takers!oohaahmortimer said:206-221 the spread on England’s runs0 -
23-3. Root out for 6.0
-
Any advances on 1502
-
This is not a Test wicket by the way. At the beginning of the second day you should be able to play with confidence and we can't on that.1
-
Axar Patel strikes.
23-3
England rootless.
150 looks unlikely.0 -
Yours!!!oohaahmortimer said:Any advances on 1500 -
I offered 250 no interestAddick Addict said:
Not now it won't be! I offered people a buy at 280 - no wonder there were no takers!oohaahmortimer said:206-221 the spread on England’s runs
150 will be a result
163-171 with sporting index
0 -
Sorry I was offeringAddick Addict said:
Yours!!!oohaahmortimer said:Any advances on 150
never bidding ....0 -
That 1.8 (4/5) before the game on India winning this Test is looking quite large now but the 1.66 (4/6) in hindsight was massive. They were hardly going to prepare a road were they?0
-
For us to get even 150 we would need a Stokes or Pope to get a 60 or 70. I might be tempted. On second thoughts probably not!oohaahmortimer said:
Sorry I was offeringAddick Addict said:
Yours!!!oohaahmortimer said:Any advances on 150
never bidding ....1 - Sponsored links:
-
The issue is that we can't do anything to spread the field a bit. With so many in catching positions we are living a bit of a slow death as reflected by Lawrence's 9 off 49 balls but then you chance your arm and you're back in the pavilion. Time isn't an issue but runs are.0
-
And there you have it with the very last ball before lunch!
39-4 off 18 overs
0 -
Last ball before lunch brings another wicket - Lawrence was struggling the whole time. 39-40
-
Eight wickets in a 26 over session...0
-
154-162 England’s runs are0
-
Trouble is Lawrence looks out of his depth too. Which brings me nicely back to someone new batting at 3. Suspect that will be Bairstow with Crawley opening though I would prefer Bairstow at 6 and someone a bit more classy batting at 3. Anyone any ideas who that could be?Addick Addict said:Yet again both openers are out cheaply and Root is in earlier than the number 4 should be.
Burns has now scored 53 runs in his last 7 innings and 33 of those came in one of them. I did say that we needed to give Burns this and the next Test to get a score but he has still not cured that fundamental flaw that keeps getting him out. If Burns fails again in the second innings and Lawrence does well in either should the latter be dropped for Crawley? Because Crawley needs to come back in the next Test doesn't he?1 -
Last frigging ball before lunch.
0 -
As I say this isn't a Test wicket any more than the ones in the old days were where India would score 800-3!!!!Callumcafc said:Eight wickets in a 26 over session...1 -
Oh bollocks. What a weekend of sport this is turning into.0
-
Pope batting like he has a prior engagement starting in five minutes0
- Sponsored links:
-
There's a reason that Indian wins every home series since long John Silver had two good legs.
1 -
Murali Kartik saying that he has never seen a wicket like it - describes the surface as "powder"1
-
The difference is that India had the best of the track but also that, despite dismissing them for a relatively low score, we didn't actually bowl that well on it. Moeen night have taken 4 wickets but he shouldn't be going for 128 runs off 29 overs on it.2
-
And now Stokes has gone
52-50 -
I never thought that I would say this but "come on you Surrey boys!!!!"0
-
Stokes nemesis strikes again.0
-
Well, this is definitely not a good weekend. Thank God that Palace lost.
0 -
You know you're in trouble when Sibley is the one with the fastest run rate!0
-
Foakes looks good - all the way forward or all the way back but nothing in between,
Yes you can blame me if and when the inevitable happens!1 -
Jeez, shhhhh.Addick Addict said:Foakes looks good - all the way forward or all the way back but nothing in between,
Yes you can blame me if and when the inevitable happens!2
