Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Kent Cricket 2021
Comments
-
137-2. Surrey need 53 runs to win from 4.4 overs0
-
Milne needs to up his game0
-
And he does so!0
-
More than 2 per ball required0
-
148-3. Surrey need 44 runs to win from 3.1 overs0
-
34 needed from 20
-
The rarely seen 8 runs from a ball0
-
18 needed off the final over. Good running from Surrey0
-
17 off 50
-
16 off 40
-
Sponsored links:
-
12 off 30
-
Wicket! 12 off 28
-
Ha ha Slurrey1
-
Wicket! 12 off 1!4
-
Worth every penny!!!!cantersaddick said:
If we pay him per wicket with a bonus every time he bowls an over for less than 10 he would be the cheapest overseas in the history of the game.Addick Addict said:
I expect you're having to pay him peanuts toocantersaddick said:
Jamieson has also been disappointing with the ball for Surreycantersaddick said:Let them get about 40 more than they should have from where we had them at one point. Disappointing really. Without Sam, Tom and Topley we really do lack death bowling.1 -
Hat trick!8
-
NEVER IN DOUBT.
Well done kent7 -
What a finish
4 -
Happy days4
-
And they did with figures of 8-0-65-4 between themAddick Addict said:Need our two overseas bowlers to step up now0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Bollox9
-
Hat trick to win it.Couldn’t see us holding on after their rapid start.6
-
Surrey bottlers!2
-
Hello
10 -
Well, the eleven runs difference barely reflects how that went. Good to see Kent pull out a win, but we 're missing something here.0
-
One more win from our last three games should be enough and definitely will be when we beat Surrey in the return fixture3
-
Good finish that and Kent deserved it. The difference was in the death bowling. Ours was poor to say the least which meant you ended up with 40 more than you should have. Yours was excellent which meant we left ourselves roo much to do despite having plenty of batting.
We lack firepower in the middle order. Roy Foakes and Sam are big misses and have meant we have shifted Smith up the order despite him being an excellent finisher. Burns is pretty pointless in this format as demonstrated by Clark and Overton batting ahead of him tonight. I'd genuinely be fine with Dernbach in for Burns. We don't lose any batting and we gain someone with death bowling ability. Maybe I'm being harsh.2 -
Dernbach plays for Derbyshire mate.cantersaddick said:Good finish that and Kent deserved it. The difference was in the death bowling. Ours was poor to say the least which meant you ended up with 40 more than you should have. Yours was excellent which meant we left ourselves roo much to do despite having plenty of batting.
We lack firepower in the middle order. Roy Foakes and Sam are big misses and have meant we have shifted Smith up the order despite him being an excellent finisher. Burns is pretty pointless in this format as demonstrated by Clark and Overton batting ahead of him tonight. I'd genuinely be fine with Dernbach in for Burns. We don't lose any batting and we gain someone with death bowling ability. Maybe I'm being harsh.3 -
I see we've lost some more players to The Hundred with the following all leaving our ranks (and including 5 of our top 6 tonight):
DBD
Crawley
Cox
Denly
Blake
Billings
Klaassen
Milnes
Qais Ahmad
This leaves us with for the Royal London:
Robinson
Kuhn
Leaning
Muyeye
O'Riordan
Qadri
Logan
Milne
Stevens
Podmore
Gilchrist
Quinn
Stewart
Groenwald
So a squad of 14 including Groenwald who is currently injured. We also have just 4 frontline batsmen so I expect someone like Harry Finch, who has been playing a lot of 2s cricket for us, to be given a short term contract plus at least one other outsider or Academy member to be given an opportunity or two
1 -
Am not impressed with the Hundred; it feels fabricated and not necessary to me. Especially now we've lost so many players. It diminishes the Royal London for me.
I keep getting emails and facebook messages for tickets, which suggests to me that they are struggling to sell tickets6
