Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)

1569570572574575867

Comments

  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,785
    https://crewe.nub.news/n/crewe-1-cheltenham-mandron-strikes-as-kirk-sits-out-opener-ahead-of-move

    “Charlie Kirk watched the 1-1 draw from the Main Stand and it is understood the attacker is poised to sign for League One rivals Charlton Athletic with the Addicks renewing last season’s interest in the attacker.”

    Afterwards boss Artell said the reasons for the omissions of Kirk and Hoban would become clearer in time.

    But he admitted: “It’s been a tough week. Once everything is sorted out we will make an announcement, but nothing has happened yet.”

  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,785
    edited August 2021
    Murmurs the Crewe end that our bid of 400k has been accepted after not getting him for 500k in January. 

    Probably would explain why it’s dragged on so long if Crewe wanted that extra 100 grand we offered six/seven months ago.
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,350
    Pleased we're not signing Gomes.
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,002
    Surely that’s a good sign? Means we’re optimistic of getting someone better, or at least that’s the way I see it. If we were skint or not looking to pay to bring in more bodies, signing up Madger Gomes would have been the easy option.
    That's how I see it. Gomes is the "needs must" fall back option, if we can't get the first choice then he'll do in a pinch but he's certainly not someone we seem desperate to sign as if NA really wanted to sign him, he surely would have done so already.
  • charlton_hero
    charlton_hero Posts: 4,668
    edited August 2021
    Think LW was a real weakspot today, Washington went missing at times. We definitely need 4-6 players, 4 minimum. 
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,360
    Need at least 4 bodies in. 

    I do not see any good evidence we have replaced Aneke's 15 goals. And without those 15 last year we would be mid to lower half of the table. "Bodies" alone does not get the job done, imo, if the goal is promotion or even playoffs.
    We will score more goals this season than we did last season.

    Football isn’t as simple as plugging player X in and adding 15 goals.

    Wanna put some money on that prediction? We finished 4th in the division in goals (70) scored last season and I see no way we come close to that in 2021-22. How is a £20, payable via Venmo or PayPal? Very happy to lose that money if you are proven correct. B)
    Go on then, a bit of fun. We can make it $20 since we’re both Stateside!
    Cheaping out 😉
  • Think LW was a real weakspot today, Washington went missing at times. We definitely need 4-6 players, 4 minimum. 
    Hmm, it's moments like this I wish we had access to match stats - as though he may not been super creative when he got the ball in attacking positions - he popped up everywhere and was a big reason Wednesday never created anything of note. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • charlton_hero
    charlton_hero Posts: 4,668
    edited August 2021
    Think LW was a real weakspot today, Washington went missing at times. We definitely need 4-6 players, 4 minimum. 
    Hmm, it's moments like this I wish we had access to match stats - as though he may not been super creative when he got the ball in attacking positions - he popped up everywhere and was a big reason Wednesday never created anything of note. 
    Can't see him supplying or scoring much from LW this season, sorry. He needs to be played down the middle imo. 
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,054
    I'd say 4-6 is right. Would like for it to start with Charlie Kirk, that would be a bit of a statement signing. 

    Playmaker for me is the other place if there's any budget for fees left that I'd look to spend as opposed to loan . Just think some of these PL loans that have only played U23s can look a bit lightweight in midfield. 

    Striker I wouldn't mind someone that's a bit like a Leko that can also cover wide . I don't know if someone like an Ellis Simms might still be available from Everton or if he's got championship interest. 

  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,515
    We definitely need another striker 
  • Think LW was a real weakspot today, Washington went missing at times. We definitely need 4-6 players, 4 minimum. 
    Hmm, it's moments like this I wish we had access to match stats - as though he may not been super creative when he got the ball in attacking positions - he popped up everywhere and was a big reason Wednesday never created anything of note. 
    Can't see him supplying or scoring much from LW this season, sorry. He needs to be played down the middle imo. 
    Agree with this. In a way I'd prefer to play a 4-4-2 because his movement and Stockley's ability to drop in and hold up the ball feels like it could cause havoc. 
  • esseffect
    esseffect Posts: 493
    MarcusH26 said:
    I'd say 4-6 is right. Would like for it to start with Charlie Kirk, that would be a bit of a statement signing. 

    Playmaker for me is the other place if there's any budget for fees left that I'd look to spend as opposed to loan . Just think some of these PL loans that have only played U23s can look a bit lightweight in midfield. 

    Striker I wouldn't mind someone that's a bit like a Leko that can also cover wide . I don't know if someone like an Ellis Simms might still be available from Everton or if he's got championship interest. 

    I really think we already have DJ. Creative flair that goes missing. Don’t want 2 of those 
  • flyingkiwiDK
    flyingkiwiDK Posts: 5,723
    esseffect said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    I'd say 4-6 is right. Would like for it to start with Charlie Kirk, that would be a bit of a statement signing. 

    Playmaker for me is the other place if there's any budget for fees left that I'd look to spend as opposed to loan . Just think some of these PL loans that have only played U23s can look a bit lightweight in midfield. 

    Striker I wouldn't mind someone that's a bit like a Leko that can also cover wide . I don't know if someone like an Ellis Simms might still be available from Everton or if he's got championship interest. 

    I really think we already have DJ. Creative flair that goes missing. Don’t want 2 of those 
    DJ was frustrating to watch today. Kept running down blind alleys 
  • Redvaliant
    Redvaliant Posts: 515
    esseffect said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    I'd say 4-6 is right. Would like for it to start with Charlie Kirk, that would be a bit of a statement signing. 

    Playmaker for me is the other place if there's any budget for fees left that I'd look to spend as opposed to loan . Just think some of these PL loans that have only played U23s can look a bit lightweight in midfield. 

    Striker I wouldn't mind someone that's a bit like a Leko that can also cover wide . I don't know if someone like an Ellis Simms might still be available from Everton or if he's got championship interest. 

    I really think we already have DJ. Creative flair that goes missing. Don’t want 2 of those 
    DJ was frustrating to watch today. Kept running down blind alleys 
    Think he was looking for Liam Millar.
  • flyingkiwiDK
    flyingkiwiDK Posts: 5,723
    DOUCHER said:
    not read anything yet but winger / striker should be completed on monday - cast iron source  
    Winger = Kirk
    Striker = ?
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,282
    esseffect said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    I'd say 4-6 is right. Would like for it to start with Charlie Kirk, that would be a bit of a statement signing. 

    Playmaker for me is the other place if there's any budget for fees left that I'd look to spend as opposed to loan . Just think some of these PL loans that have only played U23s can look a bit lightweight in midfield. 

    Striker I wouldn't mind someone that's a bit like a Leko that can also cover wide . I don't know if someone like an Ellis Simms might still be available from Everton or if he's got championship interest. 

    I really think we already have DJ. Creative flair that goes missing. Don’t want 2 of those 
    Yes we do, as a minimum, so when one goes missing you bring the other one on
  • Sponsored links:



  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,054
    DOUCHER said:
    not read anything yet but winger / striker should be completed on monday - cast iron source  
    Doucher is this Kirk + a striker? 
  • 995632
    995632 Posts: 319
    Need at least 4 bodies in. 

    I do not see any good evidence we have replaced Aneke's 15 goals. And without those 15 last year we would be mid to lower half of the table. "Bodies" alone does not get the job done, imo, if the goal is promotion or even playoffs.
    We will score more goals this season than we did last season.

    Football isn’t as simple as plugging player X in and adding 15 goals.

    Wanna put some money on that prediction? We finished 4th in the division in goals (70) scored last season and I see no way we come close to that in 2021-22. How is a £20, payable via Venmo or PayPal? Very happy to lose that money if you are proven correct. B)
    You can't add players to a squad and expect the same output. By that thinking, the year we brought in Ajose and Novak they should've scored 40+ goals between them... They didn't.

    Also, Chuks' output was a bit of an anomaly - he had never scored that many goals before (and scored in that many minutes per goal).

    With the upgrade in athleticism in midfield, it should mean we also actually get in front of opposition players a bit more rather than allowing them uncontested shots at our goal. If we can keep Innis and Famewo for, we should not concede the same amount of goals too. That also might possibly be where we make up the 15 goals from. 
  • NapaAddick
    NapaAddick Posts: 4,657
    Go on then, a bit of fun. We can make it $20 since we’re both Stateside!

    I like it!
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,282
    995632 said:
    Need at least 4 bodies in. 

    I do not see any good evidence we have replaced Aneke's 15 goals. And without those 15 last year we would be mid to lower half of the table. "Bodies" alone does not get the job done, imo, if the goal is promotion or even playoffs.
    We will score more goals this season than we did last season.

    Football isn’t as simple as plugging player X in and adding 15 goals.

    Wanna put some money on that prediction? We finished 4th in the division in goals (70) scored last season and I see no way we come close to that in 2021-22. How is a £20, payable via Venmo or PayPal? Very happy to lose that money if you are proven correct. B)
    You can't add players to a squad and expect the same output. By that thinking, the year we brought in Ajose and Novak they should've scored 40+ goals between them... They didn't.

    Also, Chuks' output was a bit of an anomaly - he had never scored that many goals before (and scored in that many minutes per goal).

    With the upgrade in athleticism in midfield, it should mean we also actually get in front of opposition players a bit more rather than allowing them uncontested shots at our goal. If we can keep Innis and Famewo for, we should not concede the same amount of goals too. That also might possibly be where we make up the 15 goals from. 
    That's not scoring more though is it, that's conceding less
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,957
    Murmurs the Crewe end that our bid of 400k has been accepted after not getting him for 500k in January. 

    Probably would explain why it’s dragged on so long if Crewe wanted that extra 100 grand we offered six/seven months ago.
    I'm sure I read somewhere that the reduced fee of 400k is being negotiated with a sell-on and other add-on clauses.


  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,457
    If we have got Kirk (please let it be true, quality signing at this level) then that means well be getting 5 in before the window closes. There's no way we're not going to use the available 4 remaining match day squad loan slots. I think we'll probably get at least one more perm in addition to Kirk, so that means we should be 6-7 players better off than we are right now.

    Would have been nice to get it done earlier, but I think we'll be more than happy with the squad we end up with.
  • 995632
    995632 Posts: 319
    sam3110 said:
    995632 said:
    Need at least 4 bodies in. 

    I do not see any good evidence we have replaced Aneke's 15 goals. And without those 15 last year we would be mid to lower half of the table. "Bodies" alone does not get the job done, imo, if the goal is promotion or even playoffs.
    We will score more goals this season than we did last season.

    Football isn’t as simple as plugging player X in and adding 15 goals.

    Wanna put some money on that prediction? We finished 4th in the division in goals (70) scored last season and I see no way we come close to that in 2021-22. How is a £20, payable via Venmo or PayPal? Very happy to lose that money if you are proven correct. B)
    You can't add players to a squad and expect the same output. By that thinking, the year we brought in Ajose and Novak they should've scored 40+ goals between them... They didn't.

    Also, Chuks' output was a bit of an anomaly - he had never scored that many goals before (and scored in that many minutes per goal).

    With the upgrade in athleticism in midfield, it should mean we also actually get in front of opposition players a bit more rather than allowing them uncontested shots at our goal. If we can keep Innis and Famewo for, we should not concede the same amount of goals too. That also might possibly be where we make up the 15 goals from. 
    That's not scoring more though is it, that's conceding less
    My comment was more about not replacing Aneke's goals, not us scoring more goals overall.

    We need more creativity than Morgan for that. 
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,907
    MarcusH26 said:
    DOUCHER said:
    not read anything yet but winger / striker should be completed on monday - cast iron source  
    Doucher is this Kirk + a striker? 
    one player - a winger / striker - i think it is kirk but cast iron could not say / would not say 
  • Is jephcott still happening?
  • FishCostaFortune
    FishCostaFortune Posts: 10,773
    edited August 2021
    If we have got Kirk (please let it be true, quality signing at this level) then that means well be getting 5 in before the window closes. There's no way we're not going to use the available 4 remaining match day squad loan slots. I think we'll probably get at least one more perm in addition to Kirk, so that means we should be 6-7 players better off than we are right now.

    Would have been nice to get it done earlier, but I think we'll be more than happy with the squad we end up with.
    Well, if Kirk is true, and being a Charlton fan I am somewhat sceptical. That would mean that in terms of permanents so far we would have brought in MacGillivray, Dobson, Clare, Stockley and Kirk (and technically Famewo). 

    For me, that's seriously impressive work. 
This discussion has been closed.