Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Players Marks: Lincoln v Charlton (closes Sunday teatime)
lancashire lad
Posts: 15,699
Your marks please
MacG:
Gunter:
Lavelle:
Famewo:
Souaré:
Arter:
Gilbey:
Leko:
Kirk:
Davison:
B-T:
Stockley:
Referee:
Watson: n/a
MacG:
Gunter:
Lavelle:
Famewo:
Souaré:
Arter:
Gilbey:
Leko:
Kirk:
Davison:
B-T:
Stockley:
Referee:
Watson: n/a
0
Comments
-
lancashire lad said:Your marks please
MacG: 5 could he have held their first goal rather than partying it?
Gunter: 4.5 he’s not a captain
Lavelle: 5 got our goal at least
Famewo: 3 poor and hoofy
Souaré: 2 poor for their second
Arter: 4 fiery (like red)
Gilbey: 4 loose touches and anonymous
Leko: 3 too many touches lost the ball too often
Kirk: 3 anonymous
Davison: 4 ineffective
B-T: 1 his worst game and let them overrun us so many times. Has he given up now he’s got his contact offer?
Stockley: 3 also ineffective
Referee: 7 motm let lots go, probably should have booked their player and sent arter off
Watson: n/a
0 -
MacG: 3 The worst Charlton goalkeeper since the juggler
Gunter: 6 solid
Lavelle: 6 solid
Famewo: 6 Tried hard.
Souaré: 5.5 left exposed like all our full backs are EVERY week
Arter: 6 had some heart.
Gilbey: 3 invisible
Leko: 4 embarrassing
Kirk: 2 The ref touched the ball more than he did.
Davison: 5 Didn't work for him
B-T: 4 Zero defending
Stockley: 5 Tried hard and nicely taken own goal
Referee: More effective for us than our midfielders
Watson: n/a
2 -
MacG: 4 Amos prevents both goals
Gunter: 6.5 solid enough
Lavelle: 7 ditto plus scored
Famewo: 6 there's a good defender and one of the worst footballers I've ever seen in there somewhere
Souaré: 5.5 tried well enough
Arter: 5 tried at least and did a few things well, but his legs have gone and he's late into the tackle and a walking red card that the ref didn't give
Gilbey: 4.5 he runs around a lot. That's it
Leko: 5 couldn't get into the game at all, albeit he suffered for Lee coming off
Kirk: 1 this is that rare thing: the deserved 1. Absolutely and without parallel the worst performance I've ever seen from a player who didn't get subbed or sent off. DJ deserves damages
Davison: 4 couldn't do anything
B-T: 5.5 at least he got a few crosses in and looked up for it. We couldn't get it to him (Lee injury key here too)
Stockley: 5 good finish. Caused havoc for our goal at least
Referee: 5 should have sent Arter off
Watson: n/a should have been Clare or Dobson
Anyone who doesn't see that Lee is our most important player...bet he's out for 2 months now
Solskjaer's gonna be available!!!1 -
MacGillivray: 5 - Made some saves, has to take fault for the first goal though
Gunter: 4 - Meh, didnt do too badly today I didnt think
Lavelle: 6 - One of the few to put a shift in today
Famewo: 6 - Struggled second half but was one of the few reasons it was 0-0 after the first
Souare: 3 - Hopefully we'll see Purrington back on Tuesday not been impressed
Arter: 5 - One of our best players, but should have been sent off
Gilbey: 4 - Isnt a holding midfielder, should have been pushed forward after the Lee injury
Kirk: 3 - Dunno what to say about him to be honest, needs an arm around him
Davison: 5 - Harsh to mark him low with that sort of service
Blackett-Taylor: 3 - Worst performance for us to date
Stockley: 4 - Own goal wasnt his fault, as effective as Davison, wonder why???
Referee: 5 - Got the cards out too early to make a statement and then decided to be lenient.
Watson: N/A
Lee: N/A (6) - Difficult to give him a low mark, a lot was going through him before he got injured
1 -
MacG: 4.5 Poor
Gunter: 6 I thought he was ok
Lavelle: 6 Scored
Famewo: 5.5 Didn't score
Souaré: 3 Why wasn't Purrington playing?
Arter: 5.5 Battled. Should have got a red
Gilbey: 5 Not his best
Leko: 3 Was he playing?
Kirk: 3 Was he playing too?
Davison: 4 ineffective
B-T: 4 A couple of half decent crosses, but what is wrong?
Stockley: 5 Didn't change anything
1 -
MacG: 5
Gunter: 5
Lavelle: 5.5 - extra .5 for the goal
Famewo: 5
Souaré: 3
Arter: 5 - lucky not to get a red card
Gilbey: 5
Leko: 4
Kirk: 2 - dreadful
Davison: 4
B-T: 3
Stockley: 4
Referee: 5
2 -
MacG: 6 did a lot of catching practice
Gunter: 6 worryingly one of our better players
Famewo: 6 better than most, but inability of our centre backs to defend costs us again
Lavelle: 6 Inc +1 for the goal
Square: 4 not convinced at all, no judgement. No idea how he keeps Purrington out.
Arter: 5.5 did a decent job but should've been sent off
Gilbey: 6.5 MoM... not saying a lot.
Leko: 5.5 not convinced he played 2nd half. Best of a bad lot going forward first half
Kirk: 3 Appalling, summed up by his pass to no-one
Davison: 4 not his day, won nothing
CBT: 4.5 one good cross
Stockley: 6 won much more than Davison. Don't blame him for og
Watson: 5 calmed it a bit, but added little
Nigel: what were we trying to do? We looked so so bad. I just can't see any evidence of a plan based on that performance.1 -
MacG: 3 Too many mistakes, does not command area. Time for Henderson
Gunter: 5 Not as bad as most
Lavelle: 5 Competent
Famewo: 4 Clumsy
Souaré: 4 Not convinced yet
Arter: 6 Our best player
Gilbey: 4 Drifted out of game when he should have taken control
Leko: 4 Lots of wrong decisions
Kirk: 2 What a waste of space (and money)
Davison: 3 Gone backwards
B-T:4 Did get some good crosses in at the end
Stockley: 4 Just as ineffective as Davison
Referee: 5
Watson: n/a
1 -
MacG: 5
Gunter: 6
Lavelle: 6
Famewo: 6
Souaré: 4
Arter: 5
Gilbey: 5
Leko: 4
Kirk: 3
Davison: 4
B-T: 4
Stockley: 5
Referee: 6
Watson: n/a
1 -
MacG: 5
Gunter: 6
Lavelle: 6
Famewo: 5
Souaré: 5
Arter: 6
Gilbey: 5
Leko: 4
Kirk: 3
Davison:3
B-T: 3
Stockley: 5
1 -
Sponsored links:
-
MacG: 4
Gunter: 5
Lavelle: 4.5
Famewo: 4.5
Souaré: 3.5
Arter: 6
Gilbey: 4
Leko: 3.5
Kirk: 2
Davison: 4
B-T:3
Stockley: 5
Referee: 4
1 -
MacG: 5 - WTF he was he playing at for the first goal?
Gunter: 5
Lavelle: 5.5 - extra .5 for the goal
Famewo: 5 -
Souaré: 3 - Purrington is a better bet - and that says a lot about Souare q
Arter: 5 - should have been sent off
Gilbey: 5
Leko: 4 -lazy today
Kirk: 1- lowest mark I’ve ever given. Was an absolute disgrace today
Davison: 4 / offered nothing
B-T: 3 - woeful.
Stockley: 4 - offered nothing
Referee: 5
1 -
MacG: 5
Gunter: 5
Lavelle: 5
Famewo: 6
Souaré: 4
Arter: 6
Gilbey: 4
Leko: 3
Kirk: 2
Davison: 3
B-T: 3
Stockley: 5
Referee: 6
0 -
Your marks please
MacG: 4 Dracula with poor distribution
Gunter: 5 still nothing special
Lavelle: 6 extra point for the goal
Famewo: 5 gets caught the wrong side and tends to ball watch
Souaré: 3 poor defensively despite little help in front of him
Arter: 6 put a shift in and showed he cared
Gilbey: 5 didn’t notice him much
Leko: 3 poor overdid it in tight areas lost his man for their 1st
Kirk: 2 contributing very little to the cause desperately needs to find his mojo
Davison: 3 nothing stuck today poor performance
B-T: 4 one decent run and cross looked confused as to his roll first half
Stockley: 5.5 did ok defensively blameless with the og
Referee: 5
3 -
MacG: 4 some mistakes, doesn't come for crosses to relieve pressure
Gunter: 5
Lavelle: 6 thought he had a relatively good game together with Famewo
Famewo: 6
Souaré: 4 their right side had so much joy from him, CBT and Kirk
Arter: 5
Gilbey: 5
Leko: 4 not himself today
Kirk: 2 woeful, not interested
Davison: 4 offered nothing
B-T: 3 worst game for us
Stockley: 4
1 -
MacG: 6 feel sorry for him
Gunter: 6
Lavelle: 5
Famewo: 5
Souaré: 5
Arter: 6
Gilbey: 5
Leko: 4.5
Kirk: 3.5
Davison: 4
B-T: 3.5
Stockley: 4
Referee: 7
0 -
MacG: 6
Gunter: 6
Lavelle: 5
Famewo: 5
Souaré: 4
Arter: 5
Gilbey: 5
Leko: 5
Kirk: 4
Davison: 5
B-T: 4
Stockley: 5
Referee: 6
0 -
MacG - 5Gunter - 6Lavelle - 5.5Famewo - 4Soare - 4Arter - 5Gilbey - 5Leko - 4.5Kirk - 2 patheticDavison - 4B-T - 4.5Stockley - 5Ref - 50
-
MacG: 6
Gunter: 5
Lavelle: 6.5
Famewo: 6
Souaré: 4
Arter: 4.5
Gilbey: 4
Leko: 4
Kirk: 3.5
Davison: 5
B-T: 4.5
Stockley: 4
Referee: 7
0 -
All 1's as I cant spell zero.0
-
Sponsored links:
-
lancashire lad said:Your marks please
MacG: 5.5
Gunter: 6
Lavelle: 6.5
Famewo: 6
Souaré: 3 Purrington is better
Arter: 7 ran his socks off
Gilbey: 5 struggled today
Leko: 3.5
Kirk: 1.5 wish he'd stayed in space
Davison: 3
B-T:3
Stockley: 4
Referee: 4.5
Watson: n/a
3 -
Missed the first 30 minutes but the other 65 were bad enough to form an opinion. Watched on TV.
MacG: 5
Gunter: 6 Not a fan but he was solid
Lavelle: 5 They tried to catch him in possession as often as possible
Famewo: 5.5 some good and at least looked loke he almost cared, some bad though
Souaré: 3 No cover but constantly in the worng place
Arter: 6 As Curbs and Forch said, at least he tried to get people going
Gilbey: 3 Wasn't even sure he was playing
Leko: 3
Kirk: 2 (I think this is the lowest I have ever scored and really he deserved a 1)
Davison: 4
B-T: 3
Stockley: 6 says a lot when teh positives you see are players at least prepared to foul the opposition
Referee: 6
Watson: n/a
1 -
lancashire lad said:Your marks please
MacG: 5. Cannot kick, distribution woeful, does not command his box, pushes shots back out into the danger area. Worst CAFC keeper for years.
Gunter: 6. Tried
Lavelle: 3. I know he scored but he is one of the most limited players I have seen, slow and lacking any distribution at all. In fact his distribution is so bad we rely on Famewos long punts as he just goes sideways and back. A really poor acquisition so far.
Famewo: 6.5. distribution is poor but he cares and gives 100%. Came forwards a couple of times.
Souaré: 3. Another ex-Palace dud. Nothing we get from that club is worth having. Useless today, couldn't kick a ball 2 yards.
Arter: 5. Poor but showed some passion.
Gilbey: 4. Started brightly then anonymous for 70 mins.
Leko: 3. See Gilbey
Kirk: 1. And that is generous. What is good about his game? No pace, little skill, can't pass. Don't get him. Waste of time so far.
Davison: 3. Tried but he will be playing non league inside 3 years
B-T: 4. Bottle job on tackles, rarely took his player on. Clear why he is kicking around lower leagues.
Stockley: 6. Came on, tried hard. He is limited but our best attacker.
Referee: 7. Did fine
Watson: n/a. Came on, we let a goal in. Not his fault I don't think but simply another ex Palace dud.
2 -
MacG: 7 can’t fault him for anything
Gunter: 7
Lavelle: 7
Famewo: 6
Souaré: 5 Purrington better player
Arter: 6 game changed when booked
Gilbey: 6 same as above booking made a big diff
Leko: 6
Kirk: 6
Davison: 6
B-T: 5
Stockley: 6
Referee: 4 poor
9 -
MacG: 6
Gunter: 6
Lavelle: 7
Famewo: 6.5
Souaré: 5
Arter: 7
Gilbey: 6
Leko: 3
Kirk: 1
Davison: 5
B-T: 6
Stockley: 6
Referee: 7
2 -
MacG: 5
Gunter: 5
Lavelle: 5
Famewo: 5
Souaré: 5
Arter: 5
Gilbey: 5
Leko: 3
Kirk: 4
Davison: 4
B-T: 2 he genuinely looked like he could not be arsed today, chalk and cheese to his other performances
Stockley: 6
Referee 5
0 -
MacG: 7 Sold performance
Gunter: 8 Got forward well, some great crosses
Lavelle: 7.5 Nothing got past him
Famewo: 8.5 Immense
Souaré: 7.5 Looks a decent signing
Arter: 8 Ran the midfield
Gilbey:7.5 Back to his best
Leko: 8 A real handful
Kirk: 9 MOTM. Took all 3 goals brilliantly
Davison: 8 Showed real class
B-T: 8 They couldn't handle him
Stockley 8 Scores with the back of his head, just to rub it in
Nurse! Nurse!13 -
MacG: 6
Gunter: 6
Lavelle: 6.5
Famewo: 6.5
Souaré: 4
Arter: 6.5
Gilbey: 6
Leko: 5
Kirk: 4
Davison: 4
B-T: 5.5
Stockley: 6
Referee: 6
0 -
MacG 5
Gunter 5
Lavelle 6 (+1 for the goal)
Famewo 5.5
Souare 5
Arter 5.5
Gilbey 5
Leko 4
Kirk 3
Davison 5
B-T 4.5
Stockley 5
Referee 60 -
🎼Here for the piss take…..I’m only here for the piss take.🎼RonnieMoore said:MacG: 7 can’t fault him for anything
Gunter: 7
Lavelle: 7
Famewo: 6
Souaré: 5 Purrington better player
Arter: 6 game changed when booked
Gilbey: 6 same as above booking made a big diff
Leko: 6
Kirk: 6
Davison: 6
B-T: 5
Stockley: 6
Referee: 4 poor5

















