Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

FA Cup 2021/22 Thread

1242527293074

Comments

  • Valley11 said:
    Anyone else think that’s got 2-0 to Gateshead written all over it? 
    Not sure you'll be able to tell.

    "Oh is it 2 now?"
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,998
    edited November 2021
    shirty5 said:
    that just looks quite possibly the worst place to watch a game of football
    May 1988 Stamford Bridge 

    Withdean Stadium, Brighton
    ridiculous view from behind the goal at the Withdean (great bar though) ... but Gateshead looks even worse
  • shirty5 said:
    that just looks quite possibly the worst place to watch a game of football
    May 1988 Stamford Bridge 

    Withdean Stadium, Brighton
    The old Wembley was pretty rubbish as well
  • clive said:
    For those of you looking for a cheaper train deal there is one ticket on sale priced at £42.00[£27.70]  on the 11.27 to Sunderland arr 14.52, with returns priced at £28.50[£18.80] on the 12.18 dep from Sunderland.
    Frequent metro services run between Sunderland & Gateshead stadium.
    Premier inn Sunderland city centre £39.50 for one night.
    Railcard fares in brackets.
    I was thinking “That’s proper Charlton” but then noticed you hadn’t put the train drivers’ names. 
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    shirty5 said:
    that just looks quite possibly the worst place to watch a game of football
    May 1988 Stamford Bridge 

    Withdean Stadium, Brighton
    The taxpayer’s stadium.
  • Valley11 said:
    Anyone else think that’s got 2-0 to Gateshead written all over it? 


     I would have DJ on the first leg, then Gilbey to hand over to Davison before CBT brings home the Baton with the result that Cafc win in a photo finish.

    Watson doesn't make the team !
    We can put Adam Gemili in Ben Watson's shirt as a ringer  :D
  • shirty5 said:
    that just looks quite possibly the worst place to watch a game of football
    May 1988 Stamford Bridge 

    Withdean Stadium, Brighton
    1066 at Stamford Bridge was a bit of a battle, too. 
  • Valley11 said:
    That will test the stamina of fans that like to run on the pitch when we score!
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    You will probably see more on the telly than at the stadium, although nothing beats being there.
    However this is definitely an exception in my opinion.
  • stonemuse said:
    shirty5 said:
    that just looks quite possibly the worst place to watch a game of football
    May 1988 Stamford Bridge 

    Withdean Stadium, Brighton
    ridiculous view from behind the goal at the Withdean (great bar though) ... but Gateshead looks even worse
    Away fans are normally in the stand on the right, not behind a goal. Still has the running track between the stand and the pitch, but not as bad a view as you'd get from one of the ends.
  • Sponsored links:



  • One word for that stadium.

    Binoculars.
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,998
    stonemuse said:
    shirty5 said:
    that just looks quite possibly the worst place to watch a game of football
    May 1988 Stamford Bridge 

    Withdean Stadium, Brighton
    ridiculous view from behind the goal at the Withdean (great bar though) ... but Gateshead looks even worse
    Away fans are normally in the stand on the right, not behind a goal. Still has the running track between the stand and the pitch, but not as bad a view as you'd get from one of the ends.
    When we went with Charlton, we were behind the goal.  
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,221
    clive said:

    The Football Association is investigating whether Exeter City used too many substitutes during their FA Cup win over Bradford City on Tuesday.

    The Grecians, who went on to win the game 3-0 in extra time, changed five players during the goalless 90 minutes.

    They then brought on Josh Key for Sam Nombe at the start of extra time.

    Under FA Cup rules this season clubs can bring on five players during a game, including extra time, with a sixth allowed for a concussion.

    "A review is due to take place following last night's FA Cup game between Exeter City and Bradford City at St James Park," Exeter City said in a statement.

    "The matter will be considered by an FA committee and is in reference to the number of substitutions allowed during the match.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59320476

    Game to be replayed Tuesday 30th November 
  • shirty5 said:
    clive said:

    The Football Association is investigating whether Exeter City used too many substitutes during their FA Cup win over Bradford City on Tuesday.

    The Grecians, who went on to win the game 3-0 in extra time, changed five players during the goalless 90 minutes.

    They then brought on Josh Key for Sam Nombe at the start of extra time.

    Under FA Cup rules this season clubs can bring on five players during a game, including extra time, with a sixth allowed for a concussion.

    "A review is due to take place following last night's FA Cup game between Exeter City and Bradford City at St James Park," Exeter City said in a statement.

    "The matter will be considered by an FA committee and is in reference to the number of substitutions allowed during the match.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59320476

    Game to be replayed Tuesday 30th November 
    What a drag for the supporters. I can't imagine too many Bradford supporters want another (midweek) trip to Exeter!
  • Exeter could consider themselves very lucky... Sort of thing that clubs usually get kicked out of competitions for.
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,735
    edited November 2021
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,229
    edited November 2021
    shirty5 said:
    that just looks quite possibly the worst place to watch a game of football
    May 1988 Stamford Bridge 

    Withdean Stadium, Brighton
    1066 at Stamford Bridge was a bit of a battle, too. 

    AA, after Harold Godwinson my Anglo Saxon relative on my paternal side, defeated the Vikings under Harald Hardrada in the semi final of the Euros on 25th September 1066 at Stamford bridge "up North"; because of Engineering works his men had to march home some with athletes foot and the odd arm missing to prepare for the final at Senlac Hill, Battle, over the weekend of the 13/14 October against the Normans, under William the Bastard. The Normans had a bye in the semi final when the Romans didn't turn up because they were 600 years past their sell by date 

    Harold who had his EUFA pro licence liked to play narrow and defend and keep a high line. Now Billy the bastard liked to attack down the flanks, unfortunately for my team Anglo Saxon Rovers, some of his defenders had a brain freeze and chased down after  Norman conquest United attackers who were in retreat but it was a trick and they were cut to ribbons. As you all know there were no Subs in those days, even Keith Peacock was still in the academy and the momentum swing was amazing and the rest is History.

    I must move on, but for me it's too soon.

  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 13,917
    Valley11 said:
    That will test the stamina of fans that like to run on the pitch when we score!
    Me and the rest of the running thread crew, are gonna do a 5k 
  • stonemuse said:
    stonemuse said:
    shirty5 said:
    that just looks quite possibly the worst place to watch a game of football
    May 1988 Stamford Bridge 

    Withdean Stadium, Brighton
    ridiculous view from behind the goal at the Withdean (great bar though) ... but Gateshead looks even worse
    Away fans are normally in the stand on the right, not behind a goal. Still has the running track between the stand and the pitch, but not as bad a view as you'd get from one of the ends.
    When we went with Charlton, we were behind the goal.  
    Think he means away fans will be in the stand on the right at Gateshead.
  • Sponsored links:



  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,998
    stonemuse said:
    stonemuse said:
    shirty5 said:
    that just looks quite possibly the worst place to watch a game of football
    May 1988 Stamford Bridge 

    Withdean Stadium, Brighton
    ridiculous view from behind the goal at the Withdean (great bar though) ... but Gateshead looks even worse
    Away fans are normally in the stand on the right, not behind a goal. Still has the running track between the stand and the pitch, but not as bad a view as you'd get from one of the ends.
    When we went with Charlton, we were behind the goal.  
    Think he means away fans will be in the stand on the right at Gateshead.
    👍
  • ct_addick
    ct_addick Posts: 4,333
    Remember Gateshead as a famous Athletics town.....wasn't Steve Cram from there ? That's probably where they compete.
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,221
    ct_addick said:
    Remember Gateshead as a famous Athletics town.....wasn't Steve Cram from there ? That's probably where they compete.
    Cram was born in Gateshead and ran for the Jarrow Athletics Club. Brendan Foster was a member of the Gateshead club. 
  • shirty5 said:
    ct_addick said:
    Remember Gateshead as a famous Athletics town.....wasn't Steve Cram from there ? That's probably where they compete.
    Cram was born in Gateshead and ran for the Jarrow Athletics Club. Brendan Foster was a member of the Gateshead club. 
    Cram is a Sunderland supporter. I'm not sure what the split would be in that area. It's the "wrong" side of the Tyne, but Newcastle is much closer
  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,454
    Exeter could consider themselves very lucky... Sort of thing that clubs usually get kicked out of competitions for.
    Exeter City manager Matt Taylor said he and his staff were told by the match officials that they could use a sixth substitute in extra time if all five changes had been made during the 90 minutes.

    "We all thought we could use a sixth sub in extra time, we subsequently did so, but it turns out that decision was wrong and we shouldn't have been allowed to do that," Taylor told BBC Sport.

    "Bradford tried to make a sixth substitution and that was turned down, so a strange chain of events occurred, and nobody knew what had happened until well after the game when it became apparent on the referee's team sheet."

    "I should have done more due diligence as manager, it's my responsibility," he added.

    "In the meetings with the officials before the game and during the game the information that was relayed to us was wrong, hence why I think we're still in the competition because we've not tried to cheat the system.

    "It's an honest mistake and it's not just ourselves who've made that mistake, but we feel the brunt of that responsibility because it's ourselves who've ultimately been punished."

    Bradford manager Derek Adams did not want to comment on the FA's decision to replay the game, but did confirm that the red card shown to striker Lee Angol during the match will stand.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59330673

  • clive said:
    Exeter could consider themselves very lucky... Sort of thing that clubs usually get kicked out of competitions for.
    Exeter City manager Matt Taylor said he and his staff were told by the match officials that they could use a sixth substitute in extra time if all five changes had been made during the 90 minutes.

    "We all thought we could use a sixth sub in extra time, we subsequently did so, but it turns out that decision was wrong and we shouldn't have been allowed to do that," Taylor told BBC Sport.

    "Bradford tried to make a sixth substitution and that was turned down, so a strange chain of events occurred, and nobody knew what had happened until well after the game when it became apparent on the referee's team sheet."

    "I should have done more due diligence as manager, it's my responsibility," he added.

    "In the meetings with the officials before the game and during the game the information that was relayed to us was wrong, hence why I think we're still in the competition because we've not tried to cheat the system.

    "It's an honest mistake and it's not just ourselves who've made that mistake, but we feel the brunt of that responsibility because it's ourselves who've ultimately been punished."

    Bradford manager Derek Adams did not want to comment on the FA's decision to replay the game, but did confirm that the red card shown to striker Lee Angol during the match will stand.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59330673

    Ridiculous chain of events from the FA.

     - One club allowed to make a sixth substitute, one club wasn't.

    Imagine had Bradford been allowed to do similar, then there would be no need for a replay.

    In addition, how can a red card stand when the game doesn't effectively exist anymore?
  • clive said:
    Exeter could consider themselves very lucky... Sort of thing that clubs usually get kicked out of competitions for.
    Exeter City manager Matt Taylor said he and his staff were told by the match officials that they could use a sixth substitute in extra time if all five changes had been made during the 90 minutes.

    "We all thought we could use a sixth sub in extra time, we subsequently did so, but it turns out that decision was wrong and we shouldn't have been allowed to do that," Taylor told BBC Sport.

    "Bradford tried to make a sixth substitution and that was turned down, so a strange chain of events occurred, and nobody knew what had happened until well after the game when it became apparent on the referee's team sheet."

    "I should have done more due diligence as manager, it's my responsibility," he added.

    "In the meetings with the officials before the game and during the game the information that was relayed to us was wrong, hence why I think we're still in the competition because we've not tried to cheat the system.

    "It's an honest mistake and it's not just ourselves who've made that mistake, but we feel the brunt of that responsibility because it's ourselves who've ultimately been punished."

    Bradford manager Derek Adams did not want to comment on the FA's decision to replay the game, but did confirm that the red card shown to striker Lee Angol during the match will stand.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59330673

    Ridiculous chain of events from the FA.

     - One club allowed to make a sixth substitute, one club wasn't.

    Imagine had Bradford been allowed to do similar, then there would be no need for a replay.

    In addition, how can a red card stand when the game doesn't effectively exist anymore?
    The same happened to a Doncaster player when our waterlogged game against Doncaster was abandoned!
  • Croydon said:
    Valley11 said:
    Anyone else think that’s got 2-0 to Gateshead written all over it? 
    Our stand is on the right, and now has no roof.  You just know it's going to pour down.
    I thought the roof had been recently added. Have they removed it again?
    I may be mistaken but I saw a photo recently with there being no roof.
  • RaplhMilne
    RaplhMilne Posts: 4,601
    I had a bet on the original game for both teams to score. As the result has been cancelled will I get my money back…… ? 
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,010
    edited November 2021
    clive said:
    Exeter could consider themselves very lucky... Sort of thing that clubs usually get kicked out of competitions for.
    Exeter City manager Matt Taylor said he and his staff were told by the match officials that they could use a sixth substitute in extra time if all five changes had been made during the 90 minutes.

    "We all thought we could use a sixth sub in extra time, we subsequently did so, but it turns out that decision was wrong and we shouldn't have been allowed to do that," Taylor told BBC Sport.

    "Bradford tried to make a sixth substitution and that was turned down, so a strange chain of events occurred, and nobody knew what had happened until well after the game when it became apparent on the referee's team sheet."

    "I should have done more due diligence as manager, it's my responsibility," he added.

    "In the meetings with the officials before the game and during the game the information that was relayed to us was wrong, hence why I think we're still in the competition because we've not tried to cheat the system.

    "It's an honest mistake and it's not just ourselves who've made that mistake, but we feel the brunt of that responsibility because it's ourselves who've ultimately been punished."

    Bradford manager Derek Adams did not want to comment on the FA's decision to replay the game, but did confirm that the red card shown to striker Lee Angol during the match will stand.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59330673

    Ridiculous chain of events from the FA.

     - One club allowed to make a sixth substitute, one club wasn't.

    Imagine had Bradford been allowed to do similar, then there would be no need for a replay.

    In addition, how can a red card stand when the game doesn't effectively exist anymore?
    Does that mean he gets to serve his ban for the red card in the same game he was sent off in?

    Or do red cards in cup games mean you can serve the suspensions in league games?