Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
STATBANK: Charlton 2-0 Plymouth

lancashire lad
Posts: 15,633
many thanks to the102 Lifers who gave marks, I enjoyed that 















15
Comments
-
Well done Lancs, as always. Great set of scores befitting a great performance, and harsh to pick out a MOTM, so glad it's someone who has been such a key part of the turnaround. Well earned first MOTM for him, though Lee surely will get one soon.3
-
37% possession, worse pass completion rate, 100% goals. There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.2
-
@lancashire lad Lavelle listed twice in the Discipline section?0
-
fat man on a moped said:@lancashire lad Lavelle listed twice in the Discipline section?0
-
The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.
The same could arguably said about Davison too0 -
killerandflash said:The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.
The same could arguably said about Davison too
Davison deserves a decent mark because of the work rate he put in. Defending from the front!4 -
killerandflash said:The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.
The same could arguably said about Davison too0 -
I thought Purrington had a good game but not an 8.63 game myself, got a lot of emotional post-game 10s because he scored3
-
But I guess that's the winning against a good team bonus. Marks get inflated. Gilbey 8.31 - yeah he made some decent forward runs but...I'm being very churlish here though. Enjoy the moment yadda yadda. But the Statbank must give a FAIR REFLECTION2
-
Leuth said:But I guess that's the winning against a good team bonus. Marks get inflated. Gilbey 8.31 - yeah he made some decent forward runs but...I'm being very churlish here though. Enjoy the moment yadda yadda. But the Statbank must give a FAIR REFLECTION0
-
Sponsored links:
-
Leuth said:But I guess that's the winning against a good team bonus. Marks get inflated. Gilbey 8.31 - yeah he made some decent forward runs but...I'm being very churlish here though. Enjoy the moment yadda yadda. But the Statbank must give a FAIR REFLECTION
It's ever been thus.
Lancs has often said that he reckons it averages out over a season.
Anyway, as many have commented before, it's just opinions.
2 -
I know, I know. I guess this is payback for those who put in excellent performances when we lose or draw (it does happen)
I reckon a lot of Purrington bonus marks come because people think he isn't a striker so when he scores it's like an amazing wondrous miracle or something. When will they realise he IS a striker ffs2 -
Leuth said:I thought Purrington had a good game but not an 8.63 game myself, got a lot of emotional post-game 10s because he scored
Agree 10s might be a bit much but that overall rating seems fair as it was best game for us by a long stretch.0 -
Cloudworm said:killerandflash said:The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.
The same could arguably said about Davison too
0 -
Leuth said:But I guess that's the winning against a good team bonus. Marks get inflated. Gilbey 8.31 - yeah he made some decent forward runs but...I'm being very churlish here though. Enjoy the moment yadda yadda. But the Statbank must give a FAIR REFLECTION0
-
AddicksAddict said:37% possession, worse pass completion rate, 100% goals. There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.0
-
Like the studio commentators I think the possession stats are wrong....even Walsh said, Im not having that, was the statistician asleep half the game....I thought we had more of the ball first half and perhaps they shaded the second.0
-
redman said:killerandflash said:The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.
The same could arguably said about Davison too
Davison deserves a decent mark because of the work rate he put in. Defending from the front!
His score will be well down though...0