Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Andrew Barclay
Comments
-
Lordflashheart said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.
Some people on this forum were more focussed on insulting him whilst he was burying his mum under fake profiles than trying to save the club from extinction.
Were currently in the bottom half of the third division, if people think that's acceptable then I worry for the club even more than before.11 -
I dunno why some people get so invested in what 1 fan says, like it’s more or less important that any other fan. If he don’t wanna renew then crack on, but appears to me that the majority of fans are happy with TS so far.37
-
shine166 said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.3
-
BR7_addick said:shine166 said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.0
-
Bedsaddick said:BR7_addick said:shine166 said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.9
-
Hey, Dodger, I have some good news. I know of a guy who is incredibly wealthy, into football and could save the club from its disastrous ownership. And the great news is that this fantastic guy is a smart businessman, knows a lot about football investments and can wheel and deal in the player transfer market. And the best news? He already owns the Valley.
9 -
Gates are looking pretty healthy, I have spent more at the club this year than the last 3-4 years (regular non locked down season) combined, so if some want to stay away, respect their decision, enjoy your weekends. Our intensely strong emotional attachment to our club can give us delusions of grandeur. We are in League 1, have a regular fan base of less than 15k (obviously more when the glory of Wemberly comes around once in a while) and have a former owner who legally has the rights to an asset which we would like under the control of the same party that owns the club. We know that ground owning individual is stubborn, a business man sitting on a property of considerable value and we can surmise that fans’ (rightful at the time imho) protests have done nothing to engender a warm hearted glow toward us for that same man. We are fortunate to have an owner like TS, full stop and I am afraid, I very much doubt authorities will ever likely be able to interfere with the law when it comes to ownership of real estate vs a sports club, which this is. Current ground owner’s asking price was either too high, or current club owner wanted to bide their time on its ownership, who knows? It’s their commercial decision vs our emotional attachment that ties the two together…and can send some into a negative place.
4 -
BR7_addick said:Bedsaddick said:BR7_addick said:shine166 said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.3
-
A bit of a cash injection wouldn’t go amiss.
Problem is, what do you offer in return? TS might not be perfect, but I think we’re pretty united in thinking his heart is in the right place and he’s not an exploiter, out to make a quick buck like so many of our recent owners have been.One benefit of Aussie Muir (and I don’t know if he’s even still interested) is that he’s a massive sports fan with lots of money, looking for a way to enjoy his passion to the max. Arguably, the same motivation as TS. Be wary of those who say they think it’s a smart move financially.4 - Sponsored links:
-
BR7_addick said:Bedsaddick said:BR7_addick said:shine166 said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.
The abuse @Ollywozere has been getting is ridiculous. I don't enjoy reading it and i certainly don't understand why a group of fans feel intent on trolling our owner and club officials . Perhaps I'm getting old and it's just the done thing now?
I just hope they are thick skinned and don't take the abuse personally.14 -
JamesSeed said:A bit of a cash injection wouldn’t go amiss.
Problem is, what do you offer in return? TS might not be perfect, but I think we’re pretty united in thinking his heart is in the right place and he’s not an exploiter, out to make a quick buck like so many of our recent owners have been.One benefit of Aussie Muir (and I don’t know if he’s even still interested) is that he’s a massive sports fan with lots of money, looking for a way to enjoy his passion to the max. Arguably, the same motivation as TS. Be wary of those who say they think it’s a smart move financially.4 -
Chizz said:Hey, Dodger, I have some good news. I know of a guy who is incredibly wealthy, into football and could save the club from its disastrous ownership. And the great news is that this fantastic guy is a smart businessman, knows a lot about football investments and can wheel and deal in the player transfer market. And the best news? He already owns the Valley.1
-
leefender said:BR7_addick said:Bedsaddick said:BR7_addick said:shine166 said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.1
-
BR7_addick said:leefender said:BR7_addick said:Bedsaddick said:BR7_addick said:shine166 said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.
One thing I'll say is he does everything he does under his own name rather than the fake profiles that have dug him out. The identities of the worst offenders are well known and I have no doubt he'll confront them In due course.
I'd pick him for his dedication over the self appointed fans of the year any day.5 -
Twitter is full of snowflakes calling each other snowflakes in some weird pseudo attempt to not be the biggest snowflake.
Proper odd behaviour.13 -
Big_Bad_World said:Twitter is full of snowflakes calling each other snowflakes in some weird pseudo attempt to not be the biggest snowflake.
Proper odd behaviour.2 -
BR7_addick said:Big_Bad_World said:Twitter is full of snowflakes calling each other snowflakes in some weird pseudo attempt to not be the biggest snowflake.
Proper odd behaviour.
19 -
leefender said:BR7_addick said:leefender said:BR7_addick said:Bedsaddick said:BR7_addick said:shine166 said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.
One thing I'll say is he does everything he does under his own name rather than the fake profiles that have dug him out. The identities of the worst offenders are well known and I have no doubt he'll confront them In due course.
I'd pick him for his dedication over the self appointed fans of the year any day.3 -
Let's not forget Sandgaard only owns 42% of the shares in his medical company and they have more than halved in the past 12 months, he can't realistically run a club unless it's on a shoestring so the only way is third division or downwards.
TS had very good intentions but can't make them happen. RD owns the assets so TS owns nothing but a liability2 - Sponsored links:
-
I have it on good authority that Thomas Sandgaard has made an purchase for Zynex recently that will elevate his business to a market cap of billions. It's a game changer. Let's all wait and see. In the meantime maybe if Barclay went back to Roland without the support of Peter Varney he might have a chance of Roland engaging.7
-
DagenhamAddick said:I have it on good authority that Thomas Sandgaard has made an purchase for Zynex recently that will elevate his business to a market cap of billions. It's a game changer. Let's all wait and see. In the meantime maybe if Barclay went back to Roland without the support of Peter Varney he might have a chance of Roland engaging.The share price graph for Zynex on the NASDAQ for the last 12 months makes for grim reading (I am no stock market expert though)0
-
Chizz said:JamesSeed said:A bit of a cash injection wouldn’t go amiss.
Problem is, what do you offer in return? TS might not be perfect, but I think we’re pretty united in thinking his heart is in the right place and he’s not an exploiter, out to make a quick buck like so many of our recent owners have been.One benefit of Aussie Muir (and I don’t know if he’s even still interested) is that he’s a massive sports fan with lots of money, looking for a way to enjoy his passion to the max. Arguably, the same motivation as TS. Be wary of those who say they think it’s a smart move financially.0 -
-
DagenhamAddick said:2
-
Bedsaddick said:BR7_addick said:Bedsaddick said:BR7_addick said:shine166 said:colthe3rd said:I think Barclay's comment is valid though we knew that at the time of the purchase by TS. Not really sure what Dodger's problem is.
The abuse @Ollywozere has been getting is ridiculous. I don't enjoy reading it and i certainly don't understand why a group of fans feel intent on trolling our owner and club officials . Perhaps I'm getting old and it's just the done thing now?
I just hope they are thick skinned and don't take the abuse personally.6 -
It will blow the competition out of the water. So I have been told.8
-
Interesting article here and also comments
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4474561-zynex-turnaround-nears-end-unitedhealthcare-cuts-tens-reimbursement-short-stock
0 -
DagenhamAddick said:It will blow the competition out of the water. So I have been told.1
-
Lordflashheart said:Interesting article here and also comments
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4474561-zynex-turnaround-nears-end-unitedhealthcare-cuts-tens-reimbursement-short-stock
0
This discussion has been closed.