Players Marks: Charlton v Gillingham (closed early as have to work Thursday - sorry)

MacG: 6
Clare: 6.5
Lavelle: 6.5
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 7
B-T: 8
Stockley: 6
Washington: 6.5
Lee: 6
Referee: 7.5
Opposition: 5

lancashire lad said:

MacG: 6.5 nothing to do  , kicking not great
Clare: 6 good and bad
Lavelle: 6 good second half 
Purrington: 6.5 best game for a while 
Dobson: 7 couple of mistakes 
Matthews: 6 didn't do a lot
Gilbey: 7.5 much better 
Fraser: 7 has real quality 
B-T: 8 a revelation at left wing back
Stockley: 6 faded badly
Washington: 6 worked hard , but not much came off 
Lee: 3 oh dear
Referee: 7 
Opposition: 4 

Pearce: n/a

MacG: 6 - took a couple of crosses and not much else to do
Clare: 6 - some poor distribution but reasonably sound and made one excellent tackle in the second half (he wasn't to know the guy was flagged offside)
Lavelle: 6.5 - fairly solid against their big centre-forward
Purrington: 6.5 - pretty decent in a position where he has sometimes struggled
Dobson: 6.5 - displayed his usual endeavour and spread the play well on occasions, albeit he gave the ball away once or twice in dangerous areas in the second half
Matthews: 6 - a tidy enough display
Gilbey: 7 - got in some good positions but lacks composure and his first touch often let's him down
Fraser: 6.5 - a very neat and tidy player, who can see a forward pass. Not fully fit yet but there is much more to come from him
B-T: 8: MoTM - torched the opposition with his pace. Understandably faded in the second half but he still produced our best effort on goal and pulled back one excellent cross from the byeline. I hope he's fit for Saturday, as we have been largely starved of entertainment, especially recently
Stockley: 5 - very rusty but an important contributor defensively on set plays
Washington: 7 - his movement was first class and he did very well for a player just returning to the side
Lee: 4 - he gave the ball away repeatedly when we had retreated towards the end, although did manage to waste a couple of minutes of injury time near the corner flag (albeit not with the panache of Tony Watt)
Referee: 7 - good
Opposition: 4 - a poor performance, especially in the light of their recent form. Harris cannot really believe that they were worth a point but I can understand him trying to keep his players' morale up for the run in.

MacG: 6.5 Looked a bit more convincing but distribution not so good.
Clare: 6.5 Hit and miss
Lavelle: 6 Did OK but was up against a difficult big man
Purrington: 6.5 Defensively sound but rarely made a forward pass
Dobson: 6.5 Usual performance but a couple of errors than usual. Didn't get booked!
Matthews: 6.5 Did a decent job
Gilbey: 7 Some good runs and a goal.
Fraser: 7 Looks useful. Maybe more to come.
B-T: 7.5 Made a difference
Stockley: 6.5 Makes a nuisance of himself even when not on top attacking form
Washington: 6.5 Some good runs. We seem to play better with Washington
Lee: 4 Hmmm
Referee: 5
Opposition: 4

MacG: 5 does not impress, letting a long throw bounce in the 6 yard box, really!
Clare: 8 lots of effort and work rate
Lavelle: 7 solid enough
Purrington: 7 
Dobson: 8 motm
Matthews: 5 don’t impress 
Gilbey: 6 only cos he scored
Fraser: 5 anonymous 
B-T: 8 very bright we should have given him the ball more
Stockley: 6.5 working hard
Washington: 5 don’t know fit
Lee: 2 he really is quite poor
Referee: 8
Opposition: 2 as poor as us if not worse

MacG: 6
Clare: 6
Lavelle: 6
Purrington: 7
Dobson: 6
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 6
B-T: 8
Stockley: 6
Washington: 6
Lee: 5
Referee: 5
Opposition: 4

Pearce: n/a

MacG: 7

MacG: 6
Clare:6 
Lavelle:7 
Purrington:6 
Dobson: 6
Matthews:6 
Gilbey: 7
Fraser:7 
B-T: 8
Stockley:6 
Washington:7 
Lee: 3

MacG: 7
Clare: 6
Lavelle: 6
Purrington: 6
Dobson: 7
Matthews: 6
Gilbey: 7
Fraser: 7
B-T: 8
Stockley: 6
Washington: 6.5
Lee: 5.5
Referee: 7
Opposition: 5

Pearce: n/a 

MacG: 6 - Not a lot to do but better (ie coming for two crosses); distribution poor though
Clare: 6.5 - Did OK
Lavelle: 6 - Did OK but lost nearly everything in the air
Purrington: 5.5 - Just about got through the game OK
Dobson: 6 - Poor first half but much better near the end
Matthews: 5.5 - Quiet game which is a bonus for him 
Gilbey: 7 - Could have had three and a yellow first half
Fraser: 6 - Early knock hampered him but slowly getting into it
B-T: 7.5 (MoM) - Did what you want from a winger; beat his man, good crosses, cut inside and shot, easy peasy!
Stockley: 4.5 - Tried hard but rarely involved
Washington: 6.5 - All action and showed real fight
Lee: 4 - Oh dear. His ever decreasing circles mean he'll be up his own arse by the end of the season!
Referee: 6 - Let a lot go which probably did us a favour
Opposition: 3 - Poor, they never really tried to win it (when we were there for the taking)

MacG: 6 Better than recently. Good to see him catching a couple of crosses. Distribution still not great though.
Clare: 6 Some good, some bad, but generally solid.
Lavelle: 6 Took time to settle, but grew into the game.
Purrington: 6 Looked very solid.
Dobson: 6 Usual solid performance, but far from his best.
Matthews: 5 No attacking threat at all. Not a wing-back. Prefer DJ at RWB.
Gilbey: 6.5 Much better from him and a goal too. Takes up some odd positions at times, which I think is why many, including me, say he often hides.
Fraser: 7 You don't notice him much when he is on the pitch, but, boy, do you notice it when he is not on the pitch. Quietly and efficiently gets on with the job. I hope the injury isn't too bad.
B-T: 7 Excellent first half, but faded badly second half otherwise would have been higher mark.
Stockley: 6 Makes a difference at both ends of the pitch. Doesn't seem to be fully match fit yet.
Washington: 6.5 Great to have him back. He makes such a difference. Second name on the team sheet (after Dobson) for me.
Lee: 5 Not good at all. Seemed to be getting in the way. We noticeably got worse when he replaced Fraser 
Referee: 6 Okay. Let it flow more than some.
Opposition: 4 Not good. You can see why they are in the relegation zone. I was really surprised that Neil Harris hadn't got them "up" for this. They seemed to be lacking effort as well as quality. made us look good!