Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Charlton v Gillingham (closed early as have to work Thursday - sorry)

13»

Comments

  • EveshamAddick
    EveshamAddick Posts: 7,019
    MacG: 6 - seemed slightly more confident and had been clearly told to come for the ball as his team mates made a big fuss of him twice when he did so
    Clare: 6.5 - terrible sliced clearance late on almost let them in but not too bad otherwise 
    Lavelle: 8 - played well 
    Purrington: 7.5 - good game 
    Dobson: 6.5 - drifted in and out , disappeared at times.
    Matthews: 7 - solid
    Gilbey: 8.5 - good first half, nice goal, faded as the game went on
    Fraser: 8 - did well, we suffered when he went off 
    B-T: 9 MOM made the goal and was prepared to run at them and shoot from distance
    Stockley: 8 - bulled around a lot to no great effect
    Washington: 8 - not stop running performance all game but needs to cut out silly fouls
    Lee: 3.5 - extra mark for his Tony Watt antics but otherwise poor
    Referee: 7 - mostly good 
    Opposition: 7 - looked like a poor side who may well go down 

    Pearce: n/a - seemed an odd substitution, luckily he didn’t have much to do
  • CL_Phantom
    CL_Phantom Posts: 5,519
    edited March 2022

    MacG: 6 - Claimed a ball in the box like a real keeper. Distributions wank.
    Clare: 7 - Back to how he first looked at CB.
    Lavelle: 7 - Like him a lot, will grow into the club I feel.
    Purrington: 6 - Nothing stood out, and as was out of position gets a 6.
    Dobson: 6.5 - Lacking a bit last night but still does a lot for the team.
    Matthews: 6 - Played fairly well
    Gilbey: 8 - The running is back and didn't hide behind the oppo players for the second half. Must of had more shots alone than the whole team in the 3 games prior.
    Fraser: 7.5 - Can see what he brings, amazing what happens when you don't lump the ball over his head 
    B-T: 8.5 - Best player on the pitch by far, direct. 
    Stockley: 6 - Still getting up to speed.
    Washington: 6 - Still getting up to speed (but still ran himself into the ground, machine)
    Lee: 5 - If football was about running into and kicking the ball into the opposition players he'd be great. It isn't though. He isn't though.

    Referee: 6 - Meh, average but nothing too bad.
    Opposition:  4 - Utter wank, thankfully. 

    Pearce: n/a
  • SpicedAddick
    SpicedAddick Posts: 737
    MacG: 6
    Clare: 7
    Lavelle: 6  
    Purrington: 7 
    Dobson: 8
    Matthews: 6 
    Gilbey: 7
    Fraser: 7
    B-T: 8
    Stockley: 7
    Washington: 7
    Lee: 6
    Referee: 7 
    Opposition: 6
  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,867
    Bailey said:
    MacG: 6, Did nothing wrong tonight
    Clare: 5, Below par
    Lavelle: 8, Our best player at the back
    Purrington: 6, Average
    Dobson: 5, Tried but not at his best
    Matthews: 7, Decent
    Gilbey: 7, Kept trying 
    Fraser: 7, Missed him when he went off
    B-T: 7, Helped us dominate the first 45
    Stockley: 5, He's been out a long time and is still off the pace
    Washington: 7, Missed his running
    Lee: 5, And that's being kind
    Referee: 6 Ok
    Opposition, Poor, tried to frustrate but once they conceded it was back to long ball.
    Lavelle didn’t win a single challenged header all night!
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330

    MacG: 7
    Clare: 7
    Lavelle: 7.5
    Purrington: 6
    Dobson: 7
    Matthews: 6
    Gilbey: 7
    Fraser: 7.5
    B-T: 8
    Stockley: 7
    Washington: 7
    Lee: 6
    Referee: 8
    Opposition: 7



  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,285
    MacG: 6
    Clare: 6.5
    Lavelle: 6.5
    Purrington: 6.5
    Dobson: 7
    Matthews: 6.5
    Gilbey: 7.5
    Fraser: 7
    B-T: 7.5
    Stockley: 7
    Washington: 7
    Lee: 6.5
    Referee: 6.5
    Opposition: 5
  • Karim_myBagheri
    Karim_myBagheri Posts: 12,725
    MacG: 6 - came for a couple of crosses. Slow to release the ball. Needs to build up his confidence. 
    Clare: 7
    Lavelle: 6 - Oliver troubled him, especially in the air. 
    Purrington: 6.5
    Dobson: 7 - a couple of errors but he reads danger very well. 
    Matthews: 6.5
    Gilbey: 7.5 - well after several appalling performances we get to see what Gilbs can do when given the room. helps having washington ahead of him. 
    Fraser: 6.5 - wanted the ball alot. need more from him with his attacking play. worked well with BT on the wing. 
    B-T: 7 - Just like how he played against Gillingham before, a real threat. Tired in the second half. Only worry with our formation is against a side who also has a threat on their wing how long can he sustain running back to defend and then going forward on an attacking run? 
    Stockley: 7 - works hard. Need him not only for his forward play but for his leadership and for his defensive work. 
    Washington: 7 - Runs. A LOT. wish we could supply him with some decent forward balls rather than getting him to run for lofted balls into the wide positions. 
    Lee: 5 
    Referee: 7
    Opposition: 3 
  • cafc4ever
    cafc4ever Posts: 565
    MacG: 7
    Clare: 7
    Lavelle: 7.5
    Purrington: 7
    Dobson: 7
    Matthews: 6.5
    Gilbey: 7.5
    Fraser: 7.5
    B-T: 8
    Stockley: 7
    Washington: 6.5
    Lee: 5
    Referee: 8
    Opposition: 3
  • PopIcon
    PopIcon Posts: 5,970
    MacG: 6
    Clare: 5
    Lavelle: 6
    Purrington: 6
    Dobson: 7
    Matthews: 6
    Gilbey: 8
    Fraser: 7
    B-T: 7.5
    Stockley: 6.5
    Washington: 6
    Lee: 4
  • Redhenry
    Redhenry Posts: 5,359
    MacG: 7 much better
    Clare: 6.5 gives the ball away a bit
    Lavelle: 6.5 his level
    Purrington: 6.5 his level
    Dobson: 7 worked and passed well
    Matthews: 6.5 his level
    Gilbey: 7.5 all action
    Fraser: 7 neat and tidy
    B-T: 8 pace caused them all sorts of problems
    Stockley: 7 worked hard
    Washington: 7 worked hard
    Lee: 6.5 ok
    Referee: 6.5
    Opposition: 5.5
  • Sponsored links:



  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,635
    lancashire lad said:
    MacG:       7
    Clare:       7
    Lavelle:     7
    Purrington:  7
    Dobson:     7.5
    Matthews:  7
    Gilbey:      7.5
    Fraser:      7
    B-T:          7.5
    Stockley:    6.5
    Washington:   7.5
    Lee:            7
    Referee: 
    Opposition: 

    Pearce: n/a




  • StreekDerek
    StreekDerek Posts: 352
    MacG: 6
    Clare: 7
    Lavelle: 6.5
    Purrington: 6
    Dobson: 7.5
    Matthews: 6.5
    Gilbey: 7
    Fraser: 6
    B-T: 8
    Stockley: 6
    Washington: 6.5
    Lee: 5
    Referee: 6
    Opposition: 4
  • EveshamAddick
    EveshamAddick Posts: 7,019
    JamesSeed said:
    MacG: 7
    Clare: 6
    Lavelle: 7
    Purrington: 6
    Dobson: 6
    Matthews: 6
    Gilbey: 7
    Fraser: 7
    B-T: 8 MOTM
    Stockley: 6
    Washington: 6.5
    Lee: 5
    Referee: 5
    Opposition: 3 He’s rubbish that Harris. 

    May have to swap from the covered end to the west stand next year. The old eyesight is a bit dodge, and can hardly make out the players if they’re up the south stand end. 
    Glasses?
  • Billy_Mix
    Billy_Mix Posts: 2,707
    MacG: 6
    Clare: 4
    Lavelle: 4 
    Purrington: 6
    Dobson: 7
    Matthews: 4
    Gilbey: 6
    Fraser: 5
    B-T: 7
    Stockley: 7 
    Washington: 7 
    Lee: 4
    Referee: 3 
    Opposition: 2 
  • Dansk_Red
    Dansk_Red Posts: 5,728
    MacG: 6
    Clare: 6.5
    Lavelle: 6.5
    Purrington: 6.5
    Dobson: 7
    Matthews: 6
    Gilbey: 7
    Fraser: 7
    B-T: 7
    Stockley: 6
    Washington: 6.5
    Lee: 5
    Referee: 6
    Opposition: 4
  • YTS1978
    YTS1978 Posts: 1,705
    MacG: 6 I arrived 10mins late, so missed the 1st min throw on "flap", but thought he was pretty composed and distributed well
    Clare: 6 lots of energy and a brilliant challenge in the 2nd half, although flagged offside
    Lavelle: 5 knocks the ball around well, but got beaten in the air a lot. Not convinced yet.
    Purrington: 6 did a job
    Dobson: 7 was instrumental in switching play from wing to wing which wore Gills down eventually 
    Matthews: 6 pretty solid 
    Gilbey: 7 benefitted from the ball sticking up front and exploited the gaps Stockley and Washington created. Looked up for it for a change
    Fraser: 6 not overly impressed so far, but like the way he's constantly on the move and demanding the ball. More to come I'm sure
    B-T: 8 MOTM was a real menace. Great to have him back 
    Stockley: 7 worked his nuts off
    Washington: 7 ditto
    Lee: 4 he's had some stormers this season, but yesterday wasn't one of them! Thanks  but no thanks
    Referee: 6 average, not awful. not helped the ACS lino who was completely inept
    Opposition: 1 useless. I've given them a point just for the sheer ridiculousness of a fan throwing a smoke bomb onto the pitch to celebrate their first shot on goal. What was that all about?

    Pearce: n/a

Categories

“Marketplace”