Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Wembly Shadow

Red_in_SE8
Red_in_SE8 Posts: 5,961
edited May 2009 in General Charlton
I absolutely hate the way 3/4 of the pitch on a sunny day at the new wembly stadium is in a deep shadow.

Comments

  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,350
    GOALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
  • NathanPrior
    NathanPrior Posts: 3,577
    haha fastest goal ever
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,737
    not seen by quite a few...................cos of the shadow ;-)
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,859
    They can slide parts of the roof out of the way to get rid of the shadow, but ITV need the roof in place to allow that silly camera to operate
  • BBClaus
    BBClaus Posts: 831
    i blame clive tyldsley for that shadow.
  • Daggs
    Daggs Posts: 1,344
    I blame Waggot
  • pilchard
    pilchard Posts: 3,763
    It annoyed me too.
  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458
    [cite]Posted By: Daggs[/cite]I blame Waggot
    [cite]Posted By: pilchard[/cite]It annoyed me too.

    What,Waggott & the shadow ?

    ;-)
  • bigstemarra
    bigstemarra Posts: 5,099
    The shadow was annoying.
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,915
    we used to call Bryan Hughes 'The Shadow'. I wondered where he was, at Wembley apparently.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Daggs
    Daggs Posts: 1,344
    To be serious for a moment ! The shadow on the pitch completely destroyed my enjoyment of the game. Not that i cared much about Chelsea V Everton. But had that been Charlton V Anyone in the cup final, i would be seriously pi**ed off.




    Hang on a minute !!!!!!!!!! If that had been Charlton V Anyone i'd have been there...........................
    Well! you know what i mean...............................dontcha?
  • BrentfordAddick
    BrentfordAddick Posts: 1,474
    It's less of a problem if you watch terrestrial coverage as the signal compression on satellite can be pretty tough. It's worse on LCD and plasma TVs than old fashioned CRT (ie big heavy)sets as these are better at coping with dark pictures.

    But it's annoying. I remember reading some of the hype when the place was being built that the design and placing was such that this wouldn't be an issue and remember thinking that would only possible if the stadium was on casters and slid along to follow the sun. Anyway. The Collisseum in Rome had sunshades built to stop the glare ruining the site of a few Christians being killed so some kind of translucent screen could presumably be put in place, though that would probably bung another fiver on the cost of a burger.
  • Red_in_SE8
    Red_in_SE8 Posts: 5,961
    In today's Times.

    When the stadium was rebuilt at a cost of £757 million, the architects were said to have employed astronomers to calculate the sun’s position on May afternoons. It was believed that, at 3pm on Cup Final day, only the two southern corner flags would be in shadow.

    Given that today scientists can predict the smallest deviations and 'wobbles' of our planet's orbit around the sun for many years in the future how did they get this so badly wrong? I am sure the Romans could have predicted the length of shadows 4 or 5 years into the future with better accuracy then what we witnessed on Saturday!
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,172
    [cite]Posted By: Red_in_SE8[/cite]In today's Times.

    When the stadium was rebuilt at a cost of £757 million, the architects were said to have employed astronomers to calculate the sun’s position on May afternoons. It was believed that, at 3pm on Cup Final day, only the two southern corner flags would be in shadow.

    Given that today scientists can predict the smallest deviations and 'wobbles' of our planet's orbit around the sun for many years in the future how did they get this so badly wrong? I am sure the Romans could have predicted the length of shadows 4 or 5 years into the future with better accuracy then what we witnessed on Saturday!
    A lot of the shower was from the non-moveable roof, astronomers aren't what they used to be!
  • pilchard
    pilchard Posts: 3,763
    [cite]Posted By: Miserableold-ish git[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Daggs[/cite]I blame Waggot
    [cite]Posted By: pilchard[/cite]It annoyed me too.

    What,Waggott & the shadow ?

    ;-)

    Both!!!
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,987
    [cite]Posted By: Red_in_SE8[/cite]In today's Times.

    When the stadium was rebuilt at a cost of £757 million, the architects were said to have employed astronomers to calculate the sun’s position on May afternoons.

    Perhaps Charlton could employ Astrologers to calculate the club's position on a May afternoon next year.

    Or even the next time we appear at Wembley - like a May afternoon next year ..... ?
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,859
    [cite]Posted By: Friend Or Defoe[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Red_in_SE8[/cite]In today's Times.

    When the stadium was rebuilt at a cost of £757 million, the architects were said to have employed astronomers to calculate the sun’s position on May afternoons. It was believed that, at 3pm on Cup Final day, only the two southern corner flags would be in shadow.

    Given that today scientists can predict the smallest deviations and 'wobbles' of our planet's orbit around the sun for many years in the future how did they get this so badly wrong? I am sure the Romans could have predicted the length of shadows 4 or 5 years into the future with better accuracy then what we witnessed on Saturday!
    A lot of the shower was from the non-moveable roof, astronomers aren't what they used to be!

    Which it would, if the FA and Wembley push back the moveable parts of the roof
  • BrentfordAddick
    BrentfordAddick Posts: 1,474
    When the stadium was rebuilt at a cost of £757 million, the architects were said to have employed astronomers to calculate the sun’s position on May afternoons. It was believed that, at 3pm on Cup Final day, only the two southern corner flags would be in shadow.

    Which assumes that CF day is on the same day every year, which it plainly isn't.
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,172
    [cite]Posted By: Rothko[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Friend Or Defoe[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Red_in_SE8[/cite]In today's Times.

    When the stadium was rebuilt at a cost of £757 million, the architects were said to have employed astronomers to calculate the sun’s position on May afternoons. It was believed that, at 3pm on Cup Final day, only the two southern corner flags would be in shadow.

    Given that today scientists can predict the smallest deviations and 'wobbles' of our planet's orbit around the sun for many years in the future how did they get this so badly wrong? I am sure the Romans could have predicted the length of shadows 4 or 5 years into the future with better accuracy then what we witnessed on Saturday!
    A lot of the shower was from the non-moveable roof, astronomers aren't what they used to be!

    Which it would, if the FA and Wembley push back the moveable parts of the roof
    A lot of the shower was cast from the side stand's roof which is retractable. There's nothing that opening the ends roof could of done.
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 29,030
    Perhaps it was the smoke of Guus' cigar, should he be fined for smoking in a work place?