Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Scott Fraser - pg 36 - left by mutual consent
Comments
-
You can see why Ipswich readily let him go. Nowhere near good enough for their team2
-
I'll judge Fraser when he's had a full pre season, his long Covid has improved/gone, his asthma is settled and the 2 cysts removed on his knee have healed. Hopefully 30th July.15
-
Not really though. Not when it's very clear we have not seen him anywhere near his best yet._MrDick said:You can see why Ipswich readily let him go. Nowhere near good enough for their team
Not that it hasn't been disappointing but judging him when he's had multiple health issues at once is harsh, especially given none of them point to him being particularly susceptible to injury.1 -
Have to say I’m slightly salivating at the thought of what Fraser might be able to produce under Garner.
I can’t really remember the last time we had a ‘pull the strings’ type midfielder who controlled the game and really linked up play well.
Although this is Charlton, so I fully expect to get my heart ripped out of my chest and stomped on.
12 -
We should be building the team around him, on paper he’s our best player. So that means 4-3-3 or 3-5-2 and getting him in his favoured position on the left of the midfield 3. If Garner gets his style right and Fraser in that position then he could easily get 20 goals contributions like he did for MK9
-
I wonder if we should, sadly, bookmark this comment ⬆️0
-
Is he as good as Forster Caskey ? Time will tell . I know they aren’t the same type of player but one can only assume that Dobson will be first choice in the holding positionNabySarr said:We should be building the team around him, on paper he’s our best player. So that means 4-3-3 or 3-5-2 and getting him in his favoured position on the left of the midfield 3. If Garner gets his style right and Fraser in that position then he could easily get 20 goals contributions like he did for MK
2 -
What JFC has over both Dobson and Fraser is versatility. In theory you could have an effective trio where Dobson sits deep as the shield, Fraser is designated as playmaker and JFC is the connection between the two who can support both/either as appropriate.wmcf123 said:
Is he as good as Forster Caskey ? Time will tell . I know they aren’t the same type of player but one can only assume that Dobson will be first choice in the holding positionNabySarr said:We should be building the team around him, on paper he’s our best player. So that means 4-3-3 or 3-5-2 and getting him in his favoured position on the left of the midfield 3. If Garner gets his style right and Fraser in that position then he could easily get 20 goals contributions like he did for MK
Where that leaves the likes of Gilbey and Morgan is still up for debate.1 -
Where they should be, back up at best. Ideally move one or both on and bring in a first choice player so the other three have genuine competition for places.thenewbie said:
What JFC has over both Dobson and Fraser is versatility. In theory you could have an effective trio where Dobson sits deep as the shield, Fraser is designated as playmaker and JFC is the connection between the two who can support both/either as appropriate.wmcf123 said:
Is he as good as Forster Caskey ? Time will tell . I know they aren’t the same type of player but one can only assume that Dobson will be first choice in the holding positionNabySarr said:We should be building the team around him, on paper he’s our best player. So that means 4-3-3 or 3-5-2 and getting him in his favoured position on the left of the midfield 3. If Garner gets his style right and Fraser in that position then he could easily get 20 goals contributions like he did for MK
Where that leaves the likes of Gilbey and Morgan is still up for debate.5 -
I seem to meet a lot of those on match days...Weegie Addick said:The one on the left was hanging around The Oak beforehand accepting drinks from strangers and not owning up to who he really was. Nice lad otherwise.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
Scoham said:
Where they should be, back up at best. Ideally move one or both on and bring in a first choice player so the other three have genuine competition for places.thenewbie said:
What JFC has over both Dobson and Fraser is versatility. In theory you could have an effective trio where Dobson sits deep as the shield, Fraser is designated as playmaker and JFC is the connection between the two who can support both/either as appropriate.wmcf123 said:
Is he as good as Forster Caskey ? Time will tell . I know they aren’t the same type of player but one can only assume that Dobson will be first choice in the holding positionNabySarr said:We should be building the team around him, on paper he’s our best player. So that means 4-3-3 or 3-5-2 and getting him in his favoured position on the left of the midfield 3. If Garner gets his style right and Fraser in that position then he could easily get 20 goals contributions like he did for MK
Where that leaves the likes of Gilbey and Morgan is still up for debate.
This is where I stand on Gilbey and Morgan too , probably look to move them on and find another senior starting quality CM. Then develop the likes of Henry,Anderson and Adigun (if he stays) behind them.0 -
0
-
The fella on the left looks like he can code.Henry Irving said:
Fraser and Lavelle 11 -
Nah, probably a masters in something like historysoapy_jones said:
The fella on the left looks like he can code.Henry Irving said:Fraser and Lavelle 4 -
I think Frazer is gonna feel like a new signing this season as we didn't get many chances to see him after he joined us and when we did he was always subbed of at 60ish0
-
What's he like with big data?soapy_jones said:
The fella on the left looks like he can code.Henry Irving said:Fraser and Lavelle 1 -
Replace “think” with “hope”.shuffles67 said:I think Frazer is gonna feel like a new signing this season as we didn't get many chances to see him after he joined us and when we did he was always subbed of at 60ish0 -
Lavelle does not look very tall, or is Fraser quite tall as well?0
-
Corpus Christi University ChallengeHenry Irving said:
Nah, probably a masters in something like historysoapy_jones said:
The fella on the left looks like he can code.Henry Irving said:Fraser and Lavelle 0 -
Waste of time, no future in it.Henry Irving said:
Nah, probably a masters in something like historysoapy_jones said:
The fella on the left looks like he can code.Henry Irving said:Fraser and Lavelle 1 - Sponsored links:
-
It's a case of IT'S NOT FRASER!
Let's just say it's a Charlton fan who is on CL.6 -
Oops. Well Lavelle is still taller than he looks in that picture then.Covered End said:It's a case of IT'S NOT FRASER!
Let's just say it's a Charlton fan who is on CL.
Signed
A short person0 -
I thought everyone realised that but it appears not.Covered End said:It's a case of IT'S NOT FRASER!
Let's just say it's a Charlton fan who is on CL.6 -
One of these is Fraser, the other is a lifer.
The joke started because Lavelle mistook the fan for the player at the Sponsors dinner and the players were joking about it on their WhatsApp group and then with the fan, all in a good way.
Fortunately for the fan, who does have a masters degree, he looks like his mum.
16 -
MA in Doppelgängery?Henry Irving said:One of these is Fraser, the other is a lifer.
The joke started because Lavelle mistook the fan for the player at the Sponsors dinner and the players were joking about it on their WhatsApp group and then with the fan, all in a good way.
Fortunately for the fan, who does have a masters degree, he looks like his mum.1 -
Uncanny! Had me fooled.Henry Irving said:One of these is Fraser, the other is a lifer.
The joke started because Lavelle mistook the fan for the player at the Sponsors dinner and the players were joking about it on their WhatsApp group and then with the fan, all in a good way.
Fortunately for the fan, who does have a masters degree, he looks like his mum.0 -
Reminds me of this in ExtrasHenry Irving said:One of these is Fraser, the other is a lifer.
The joke started because Lavelle mistook the fan for the player at the Sponsors dinner and the players were joking about it on their WhatsApp group and then with the fan, all in a good way.
Fortunately for the fan, who does have a masters degree, he looks like his mum.Maggie Jacobs : [trying to persuade Andy to ask Ross Kemp for a line] Just talk to him. Tell him you loved him in Eastenders, Ultimate Force, Spandau Ballet...
Andy Millman : He wasn't in Spandau Ballet. You're thinking of Martin Kemp.
Maggie Jacobs : Aren't they brothers?
Andy Millman : In Spandau Ballet, it's Martin Kemp and Gary Kemp.
Maggie Jacobs : So who's this one?
Andy Millman : Ross Kemp.
Maggie Jacobs : Who's his brother?
Andy Millman : I... I don't know if he's got a brother.
Maggie Jacobs : Yes, he has. The bald one, looks just like him, works in the Queen Vic.
Andy Millman : Phil Mitchell?
Maggie Jacobs : Yes.
Andy Millman : Well, they're brothers on the show but they're not brothers in real life.
Maggie Jacobs : Yes, they are! They're the Mitchell brothers.
Andy Millman : [getting exasperated] What do you mean the Mitchell brothers? You know his name's Ross Kemp!
[Maggie is still looking very puzzled]
Andy Millman : What bit's confusing you?
Maggie Jacobs : [after a pause. mumbles] The brothers.
Andy Millman : The brothers.
[an extra walks by wearing a futuristic sci-fi costume]
Andy Millman : Is that confusing you too? Do you think we've landed in the future?
Maggie Jacobs : Shut your face!
6 -
His mother also looks like Scott Fraser?Henry Irving said:One of these is Fraser, the other is a lifer.
The joke started because Lavelle mistook the fan for the player at the Sponsors dinner and the players were joking about it on their WhatsApp group and then with the fan, all in a good way.
Fortunately for the fan, who does have a masters degree, he looks like his mum.7 -
I can't believe we've signed a lifer's mother because they looked like Scott Fraser.
11
