Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Sky Glass
Comments
-
I believe its called "Sky".ShootersHillGuru said:
I’m now assuming this is a “version” of Sky Glass without the necessity of buying the Glass TV ?red10 said:If this ever becomes the market share of Sky users that may give them an opportunity to ditch the expensive satellite operation and use our infrastructure to deliver their content. If this ever happens Sky is probably over for me as our mbps won't really be good enough in rural Suffolk !!0 -
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!0 -
It’s slicker and offers better interaction with the Sky system. I think there are too many variables to say the picture quality is better but everything about it is just nicer to use.redman said:
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!0 -
Sky have had a monopoly on paid TV in this country for far too long. Enjoying their supposed struggle and long may it continue0
-
Except if you have been using a system for years, you know it inside out and it becomes the easiest to use whether it is or it isn't.ShootersHillGuru said:
It’s slicker and offers better interaction with the Sky system. I think there are too many variables to say the picture quality is better but everything about it is just nicer to use.redman said:
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!1 -
My wife was sold on the idea of Sky Glass by some friends, I had reservations but she was adamant it would be better and I know when I am beaten.
She is now asking if we can have satellite Sky back. Not having the same old programme listings menu and not being able to find stuff and no recording is her main problem. The advantage of greater choice wanes when you can call up a programme in six different ways and find there are six different ways of not being able to find a programme. At least under the old Sky system you only saw programmes highlighted that you could access with the right package. Now you have to find out what platform is transmitting the programme if you didn't make a note. Took me ages to find where I could get Welcome to Wrexham as a search only works if you already have the right app.
We have BT Broadband and I wanted BT Sport added. Was amazed to find after purchasing from BT that SkyGlass can't upload BT Sport. I had to add a Firestick and add my BT Sport subscription through that.0 -
Im actually surprised by how many people here have Sky, perhaps its a reflection of the demographic commenting but most people I know dropped off Sky years ago. We personally haven't had it for years now and don't miss it at all. We have Amazon Prime, Disney+ and Netflix, and with those 3 you're covered with a ton content for a lot cheaper than Sky. Tbh these days I don't watch a lot of 'normal' TV, and spend most of my TV watching on YouTube.
It's really only sports where Sky has any appeal, but with watching Charlton and Welling every season I don't really get the urge to watch more football on telly, apart from England games. I subscribe to NFL game pass so Im covered there too, with the bonus of watching the previous days games at more convenient times with no adverts.1 -
It’s not hard to use. My mums 90 and she coped in a couple of days. Q is far superior in every respect.MuttleyCAFC said:
Except if you have been using a system for years, you know it inside out and it becomes the easiest to use whether it is or it isn't.ShootersHillGuru said:
It’s slicker and offers better interaction with the Sky system. I think there are too many variables to say the picture quality is better but everything about it is just nicer to use.redman said:
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!0 -
One word of caution, Sky Q is not compatible with the BT smart hub 2.ShootersHillGuru said:
It’s slicker and offers better interaction with the Sky system. I think there are too many variables to say the picture quality is better but everything about it is just nicer to use.redman said:
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!
I was thinking of upgrading from BT copper broadband to BT fibre - where the smart hub is standard.
In a stroke of luck my line developed a fault just as my contract was ending. BT sent me their smart hub to try and cure the problem. In the event it was nothing to do with the hub, but I did get to try it out. The BT engineer on site failed to get it running and I later contacted BT to ask if there was a fix. They sent me a possible fix - by re configuring the channels on the hub. I carried this out to the letter and still found the set up to be unstable. I eventually got to speak to an experienced engineer in the BT test centre who confirmed it just don't work.
As I say my contract was up anyway so I ordered my fibre circuit from Sky. Obviously Sky Q works well with the Sky router supplied.
It's worth looking at upgrading from copper to a basic fibre circuit whoever you're with - as it tends to be a bit cheaper - and much, much better.
1 -
I've got Sky Q running with BT Smart Hub 2 (I've had BT FTTP for well over 18m now) with no issues.Raith_C_Chattonell said:
One word of caution, Sky Q is not compatible with the BT smart hub 2.ShootersHillGuru said:
It’s slicker and offers better interaction with the Sky system. I think there are too many variables to say the picture quality is better but everything about it is just nicer to use.redman said:
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!
I was thinking of upgrading from BT copper broadband to BT fibre - where the smart hub is standard.
In a stroke of luck my line developed a fault just as my contract was ending. BT sent me their smart hub to try and cure the problem. In the event it was nothing to do with the hub, but I did get to try it out. The BT engineer on site failed to get it running and I later contacted BT to ask if there was a fix. They sent me a possible fix - by re configuring the channels on the hub. I carried this out to the letter and still found the set up to be unstable. I eventually got to speak to an experienced engineer in the BT test centre who confirmed it just don't work.
As I say my contract was up anyway so I ordered my fibre circuit from Sky. Obviously Sky Q works well with the Sky router supplied.
It's worth looking at upgrading from copper to a basic fibre circuit whoever you're with - as it tends to be a bit cheaper - and much, much better.
However, my smart hub 2 is in modem mode, and I've got 4 Linksys Velop nodes running my wifi network in bridge mode. My Main Sky Q box and 3 mini's are running on ethernet connected via the Linksys Velop pass through.
0 - Sponsored links:
-
Sky copy protect their channels and while this was fairly easy to get round with Sky+, Sky Q involves buying specialist equipment and the results are not great. I would advise anyone wishing to save matches to DVD to stick with Sky or Sky+.Rudders22 said:speaking of why does anyone know how to record from Sky box to DVD? I have plugged in my new DVD record/player and it is not det up yet as it is looking for channels (analogue) or DB or something that doesn't exist0 -
That might as well be in Russian!! I’m getting old 🤣JohnBoyUK said:
I've got Sky Q running with BT Smart Hub 2 (I've had BT FTTP for well over 18m now) with no issues.Raith_C_Chattonell said:
One word of caution, Sky Q is not compatible with the BT smart hub 2.ShootersHillGuru said:
It’s slicker and offers better interaction with the Sky system. I think there are too many variables to say the picture quality is better but everything about it is just nicer to use.redman said:
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!
I was thinking of upgrading from BT copper broadband to BT fibre - where the smart hub is standard.
In a stroke of luck my line developed a fault just as my contract was ending. BT sent me their smart hub to try and cure the problem. In the event it was nothing to do with the hub, but I did get to try it out. The BT engineer on site failed to get it running and I later contacted BT to ask if there was a fix. They sent me a possible fix - by re configuring the channels on the hub. I carried this out to the letter and still found the set up to be unstable. I eventually got to speak to an experienced engineer in the BT test centre who confirmed it just don't work.
As I say my contract was up anyway so I ordered my fibre circuit from Sky. Obviously Sky Q works well with the Sky router supplied.
It's worth looking at upgrading from copper to a basic fibre circuit whoever you're with - as it tends to be a bit cheaper - and much, much better.
However, my smart hub 2 is in modem mode, and I've got 4 Linksys Velop nodes running my wifi network in bridge mode. My Main Sky Q box and 3 mini's are running on ethernet connected via the Linksys Velop pass through.6 -
TBF I found out by googling the problem that a hard wired ethernet cable between Smart hub 2 and Q would be a solution, but it just isn't practical in my case.JohnBoyUK said:
I've got Sky Q running with BT Smart Hub 2 (I've had BT FTTP for well over 18m now) with no issues.Raith_C_Chattonell said:
One word of caution, Sky Q is not compatible with the BT smart hub 2.ShootersHillGuru said:
It’s slicker and offers better interaction with the Sky system. I think there are too many variables to say the picture quality is better but everything about it is just nicer to use.redman said:
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!
I was thinking of upgrading from BT copper broadband to BT fibre - where the smart hub is standard.
In a stroke of luck my line developed a fault just as my contract was ending. BT sent me their smart hub to try and cure the problem. In the event it was nothing to do with the hub, but I did get to try it out. The BT engineer on site failed to get it running and I later contacted BT to ask if there was a fix. They sent me a possible fix - by re configuring the channels on the hub. I carried this out to the letter and still found the set up to be unstable. I eventually got to speak to an experienced engineer in the BT test centre who confirmed it just don't work.
As I say my contract was up anyway so I ordered my fibre circuit from Sky. Obviously Sky Q works well with the Sky router supplied.
It's worth looking at upgrading from copper to a basic fibre circuit whoever you're with - as it tends to be a bit cheaper - and much, much better.
However, my smart hub 2 is in modem mode, and I've got 4 Linksys Velop nodes running my wifi network in bridge mode. My Main Sky Q box and 3 mini's are running on ethernet connected via the Linksys Velop pass through.
0 -
I have had Sky Glass for around 6 months.Initially it was a disaster,but after a few teething problems,(programmes kept stalling at peak times)and no recording facility,I am now happy with the product.I like that if a good series comes on(I.E.Peaky blinders)you can add the whole series to a watch list thereby not having to worry about remembering to record.
any problems I had were sorted out,i.e.MY router was on the floor,no good should be at least 2 ft above ground level,also should be same distance away from telephone.All takes a little patience,but worth it.0 -
I’ve got used to Glass months ago. Works well for us. I don’t miss the recording features of old Sky, everything seems to be repeated and is available on catchup and what isn’t I don’t miss.
I can stream 4K in 3 locations around the house and don’t have signal dropout in stormy weather. Q used to annoy me as I rarely watched tv where the main box was located but couldn’t get 4K on the mini boxes which I have always thought was a bit poor from Sky.
I’m not too keen on the telly that I bought from Sky, 43 inch, I’ll probably ditch it next year and buy something a bit better quality.0 -
thickandthin63 said:I have had Sky Glass for around 6 months.Initially it was a disaster,but after a few teething problems,(programmes kept stalling at peak times)and no recording facility,I am now happy with the product.I like that if a good series comes on(I.E.Peaky blinders)you can add the whole series to a watch list thereby not having to worry about remembering to record.
any problems I had were sorted out,i.e.MY router was on the floor,no good should be at least 2 ft above ground level,also should be same distance away from telephone.All takes a little patience,but worth it.
Is that not just the same as series record on Sky Q?
0 -
The gimmick is that they’re positioning themselves as the option for bringing all the other apps together in one seamless experience. Because they no longer have the best content themselves outside of football. But they’re charging premium rates for it and not providing the best quality presentation. I’d sooner watch Netflix in 4K through the Xbox than have a mediocre TV I don’t want.Rudders22 said:
and me. the rest is just a gimmick and depends on your internet connection.CAFCTrev said:The fact that it doesn't record was a deal breaker for me.As for the recording thing - SkyQ allows you to keep things they no longer have the rights for. That’s why they’d never let you transfer it to an external memory card.When the contract with Warner Bros. is done in a couple of years and all the HBO stuff disappears (and the last movies on Sky Cinema finally disappear) it’s going to be a major problem for Sky.2 -
My mum's 87 and tries to turn on the TV with her mobile phone.ShootersHillGuru said:
It’s not hard to use. My mums 90 and she coped in a couple of days. Q is far superior in every respect.MuttleyCAFC said:
Except if you have been using a system for years, you know it inside out and it becomes the easiest to use whether it is or it isn't.ShootersHillGuru said:
It’s slicker and offers better interaction with the Sky system. I think there are too many variables to say the picture quality is better but everything about it is just nicer to use.redman said:
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!0 -
Devices with HDMI output have a protection on it with only devices correctly licensed (such as your tv) will be able to decode the source.BobK said:
Sky copy protect their channels and while this was fairly easy to get round with Sky+, Sky Q involves buying specialist equipment and the results are not great. I would advise anyone wishing to save matches to DVD to stick with Sky or Sky+.Rudders22 said:speaking of why does anyone know how to record from Sky box to DVD? I have plugged in my new DVD record/player and it is not det up yet as it is looking for channels (analogue) or DB or something that doesn't exist0 -
You could try power over ethernet devices like this: TP-Link TL-PA4010PKIT Passthrough Powerline Adapter Starter Kit, No Configuration Required, UK Plug, Pack of 2 : Amazon.co.uk: Computers & AccessoriesRaith_C_Chattonell said:
TBF I found out by googling the problem that a hard wired ethernet cable between Smart hub 2 and Q would be a solution, but it just isn't practical in my case.JohnBoyUK said:
I've got Sky Q running with BT Smart Hub 2 (I've had BT FTTP for well over 18m now) with no issues.Raith_C_Chattonell said:
One word of caution, Sky Q is not compatible with the BT smart hub 2.ShootersHillGuru said:
It’s slicker and offers better interaction with the Sky system. I think there are too many variables to say the picture quality is better but everything about it is just nicer to use.redman said:
Like AA I am still using Sky Plus which I am happy with. In what way is Sky Q better. Is it better picture quality?ShootersHillGuru said:
I’d say Sky Q is considerably better than what you are currently using.Addick Addict said:I'm still using an old box and haven't even progressed to Sky Q. And been with Sky for over 20 years too. "If the cap fits" as they say!
I was thinking of upgrading from BT copper broadband to BT fibre - where the smart hub is standard.
In a stroke of luck my line developed a fault just as my contract was ending. BT sent me their smart hub to try and cure the problem. In the event it was nothing to do with the hub, but I did get to try it out. The BT engineer on site failed to get it running and I later contacted BT to ask if there was a fix. They sent me a possible fix - by re configuring the channels on the hub. I carried this out to the letter and still found the set up to be unstable. I eventually got to speak to an experienced engineer in the BT test centre who confirmed it just don't work.
As I say my contract was up anyway so I ordered my fibre circuit from Sky. Obviously Sky Q works well with the Sky router supplied.
It's worth looking at upgrading from copper to a basic fibre circuit whoever you're with - as it tends to be a bit cheaper - and much, much better.
However, my smart hub 2 is in modem mode, and I've got 4 Linksys Velop nodes running my wifi network in bridge mode. My Main Sky Q box and 3 mini's are running on ethernet connected via the Linksys Velop pass through.0 - Sponsored links:
-
I have no idea as i only had the basic sky package,but it sounds simillarbobmunro said:thickandthin63 said:I have had Sky Glass for around 6 months.Initially it was a disaster,but after a few teething problems,(programmes kept stalling at peak times)and no recording facility,I am now happy with the product.I like that if a good series comes on(I.E.Peaky blinders)you can add the whole series to a watch list thereby not having to worry about remembering to record.
any problems I had were sorted out,i.e.MY router was on the floor,no good should be at least 2 ft above ground level,also should be same distance away from telephone.All takes a little patience,but worth it.
Is that not just the same as series record on Sky Q?
0
