Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks : Charlton v Port Vale (closes Sunday teatime)

13»

Comments

  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,235
    edited August 2023
    At the game

    AMB: 6
    ASIIMWE: 6
    JONES: 6
    HECTOR: 5 
    EDUN: 7
    DOBSON; 6
    TAYLOR: 5.5
    ANDERSON: 6
    KANU: 7
    MAY: 6.5
    CBT: 6.5
  • Amos on the wing
    Amos on the wing Posts: 1,802
    At the game

    AMB: 5
    ASIIMWE: 5
    JONES: 4
    HECTOR: 4
    EDUN: 7
    DOBSON; 6
    TAYLOR: 4.5
    ANDERSON: 5
    KANU: 7
    MAY: 6.5
    CBT: 6.5
  • newyorkaddick
    newyorkaddick Posts: 3,052
    AMB: 5
    ASIIMWE: 7
    JONES: 6
    HECTOR: 4
    EDUN: 6
    DOBSON; 7
    TAYLOR: 5
    ANDERSON: 6
    KANU: 6
    MAY: 5
    CBT: 6
    Referee: 6
  • BertieB
    BertieB Posts: 846
    AMB: 6
    ASIIMWE: 6
    JONES: 6
    HECTOR: 5
    EDUN: 6
    DOBSON; 7
    TAYLOR: 4 anonymous 
    ANDERSON: 6
    KANU: 7
    MAY: 6
    CBT: 7

  • RugbyAddick
    RugbyAddick Posts: 2,079
    AMB: 6 don’t quite see how he’s being blamed for the goals conceded
    ASIIMWE: 6 -1 for the error that lead to the third
    JONES: 6 done okay 
    HECTOR: 5 -1 for the error that lead to the second. Was a howler 
    EDUN: 6 looked dangerous. Should not be on set pieces ever again
    DOBSON; 6 good first half, looked tired in the second. Should’ve scored at the end 
    TAYLOR: 5 looked rusty, but that’s understandable 
    ANDERSON: 7 solid. Good tackling. Tired towards the end 
    KANU: 8 MOM won the penalty and scored a cracking header 
    MAY: 6.5 looks a lot more comfortable with a strike partner 
    CBT: 5 greedy. Decision making wrong all game. The one time he got it right was when he got the assist for Kanu’s goal
    Referee: 2 worst this season so far. Was never a penalty. Was 100% a red card, and only gave May a yellow card after the Port Vale bench started protesting. Awful
  • Davo55
    Davo55 Posts: 7,838
    AMB: 5.5
    ASIIMWE: 7
    JONES: 6
    HECTOR: 5.5
    EDUN: 6.5
    DOBSON: 7.5
    TAYLOR: 6
    ANDERSON: 7
    KANU: 6.5
    MAY: 6
    CBT: 6.5
  • Dansk_Red
    Dansk_Red Posts: 5,728
    AMB:             6
    ASIIMWE:     6.5
    JONES:          6.5
    HECTOR:       5
    EDUN:            6
    DOBSON;       5.5
    TAYLOR:         5.5
    ANDERSON:   6.5
    KANU:              7
    MAY:                 7
    CBT:                  6.5
    Referee:            4

    ineligible but marks allowed
    DJ: 5
    THOMAS: 5
    PAYNE: 5

  • JamesSeed
    JamesSeed Posts: 17,380
    edited August 2023
    AMB: 5
    ASIIMWE: 7.5
    JONES: 5.5
    HECTOR: 5
    EDUN: 6
    DOBSON; 6
    TAYLOR: 5
    ANDERSON: 7
    KANU: 7.5
    MAY: 6
    CBT: 7
    Referee: 5 
  • Brown59
    Brown59 Posts: 236
    AMB Poor game 
    ASIIMWE 7 Done good
    JONES 5 ok
    HECTOR 4 Terrible 
    EDUN 7 Good signing 
    DOBSON 6 ok game
    TAYLOR 4 was he playing 
    ANDERSON 7 Dangerous 
    KANU 7 Took goal well
    MAY Average
    CBT 5 Frustrating can’t shoot

    DJ 4 crap
    THOMAS 4 poor
    PAYNE 4 Hopeless 

    REF 4 Inconsistent 
  • Blucher
    Blucher Posts: 4,139
    AMB: 6 - left horribly exposed by his defence and there was nothing he could do about the goals. Changing the goalie is not the answer when we need to achieve some stability at the back, particularly when Isted has looked shaky
    ASIIMWE: 6.5 - had a fine game, including some excellent combination play with Anderson. Was playing like a wing back with 3 central defenders, rather than in a back 4, doubtless under instructions. As a result, he covered an enormous amount of ground and was fatigued in the later stages when he made the error for the third goal
    JONES: 5.5 - looked ok 
    HECTOR: 4 - a diabolical error for the second goal and I see no evidence of him providing any leadership or organisational ability at the back. I have question marks over his fitness and commitment. He needs to come out of the side
    EDUN: 6 - very good in the first half but understandably faded towards the end. Like a number of our signings, he is not fully fit. It's really a coaching and organisational issue, but - as good a delivery as it was - why was our shortest defender attempting to cover the near post for the first goal ?
    DOBSON; 7 - put in a big shift as usual
    TAYLOR: 5 - didn't do much on the ball or win it back. Too early to form a view on the player, given that he's playing his way back to fitness. I expect one of the reasons we acquired him was to cover the possibility of losing Dobson in January if we are mid-table (or worse) when it will be the last chance to obtain a fee
    ANDERSON: 8: MoTM - excellent throughout and showed great maturity and vision for an 18 year old
    KANU: 7.5 - his best 90 minutes for us
    MAY: 6 - a couple of decent efforts on goal but picked up another idiotic booking - his third of the season. At this rate, he'll be suspended by early September, which we can't afford given our dearth of strikers
    CBT: 6.5 - the final product was lacking on occasions but his pace terrified Port Vale. We are over-reliant upon him 
    Referee: 4 - I'm afraid that the standard of officiating at this level is usually poor and this guy was no exception

    ineligible but marks allowed
    DJ: he looked surprisingly rotund for a professional footballer
    THOMAS: not a good cameo but, in fairness, he is a central defender
    PAYNE: I'm afraid he belongs in League 2

Categories

“Marketplace”