Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
POST MATCH THREAD : Leyton Orient Vs Charlton Athletic : Tuesday Boxing Day 2023 : KO 13:00
Comments
-
NabySarr said:Chunes said:I don't understand how anyone could clap them off after that. You've got Brownie and Lisbie making it clear that those players weren't trying (as if it wasn't already obvious) and to stand there and clap them...?Shouldn’t be singing that at our young players singling them out1
-
.0
-
besides the dire performance by our team and the coaches what concerned me more was Alfie May, even watching on CTV he could be seen shouting and waving his arms at the other players in what looked like pure frustration. I understand why he did that but it doesn't bode well for retaining him in January.3
-
Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Cloudworm said:DOUCHER said:YannTheMann said:Gribbo said:Our players and manager are always going to be mediocre as long as we're League 1. Players who are 100% in all areas of their game don't tend to play in League 1, they're usually with Chelsea or City in the Prem.
CBT, for example, getting pelters for not being able to finish a move every time; yeah that's right, because if he did have the finishing touch every time, he wouldn't be playing for Charlton.
Just think the idea is to give a mediocre manager time and support, to get the best out of a team of mediocre players, who each make up for eachother's short falls. The only alternative to that, imo, is to invest heavily, or do a Wrexham and become fashionable overnight.
As someone who wasn't really following the club so closely during the Roland years, I beg the question; on the pitch, was it really that bad when you look back at it objectively? I know people invested a lot of time and emotion in the CARD stuff, so it might be hard to admit. However, our slide as a club seems to have a force beyond Roland and since he's left, it's worsened. He seemed to have us top of League 1/championship strugglers. Who wouldn't accept that right now?
I just wonder if what we are witnessing is the inevitable outcome of bad timing, premier League TV money allocation and escalating parachute payments since we were relegated from the prem. Even a new billionaire wouldn't be able to buy success as we don't have the revenue to satisfy the financial rules. In short, we've missed the boat and should probably accept it.0 -
Ok. Who did the Spivs buy it from?
Also how much did they buy the club, including the ground and Sparrows for, and how much did they sell it for?
Seems our demise is fundamentally linked to the value of the club which used to include real estate, but no longer does.1 -
Cloudworm said:golfaddick said:Bailey said:Cloudworm said:Right. Clearly an important point which has put us, as a club, in the bargain bin. What I missed was how The Valley ever went from the ownership of Greenwich borough to RD? Please help us out..
Fyi @Cloudworm the ground has always been owned by the owner. In 2019 ESI did a deal with Roland to buy the "club" (basically the name & the rights to play in the EFL) for the princely sum of.......£1.
Yes. £1. Basically ESI bought the loss making part & Roland kept the assets (The Valley & the Training Ground).
The rest, as they say, is history.8 -
Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Cloudworm said:DOUCHER said:YannTheMann said:Gribbo said:Our players and manager are always going to be mediocre as long as we're League 1. Players who are 100% in all areas of their game don't tend to play in League 1, they're usually with Chelsea or City in the Prem.
CBT, for example, getting pelters for not being able to finish a move every time; yeah that's right, because if he did have the finishing touch every time, he wouldn't be playing for Charlton.
Just think the idea is to give a mediocre manager time and support, to get the best out of a team of mediocre players, who each make up for eachother's short falls. The only alternative to that, imo, is to invest heavily, or do a Wrexham and become fashionable overnight.
As someone who wasn't really following the club so closely during the Roland years, I beg the question; on the pitch, was it really that bad when you look back at it objectively? I know people invested a lot of time and emotion in the CARD stuff, so it might be hard to admit. However, our slide as a club seems to have a force beyond Roland and since he's left, it's worsened. He seemed to have us top of League 1/championship strugglers. Who wouldn't accept that right now?
I just wonder if what we are witnessing is the inevitable outcome of bad timing, premier League TV money allocation and escalating parachute payments since we were relegated from the prem. Even a new billionaire wouldn't be able to buy success as we don't have the revenue to satisfy the financial rules. In short, we've missed the boat and should probably accept it.
Ipswich’s spending is of a different order to that under Powell. It’s sad some people still can’t understand that what he and others did was extraordinary, presumably because it just doesn’t fit their preferred narrative about him.
The problem in 2012 and 2019 is that the situation wasn’t sustainable. The Spivs had no money and the Belgian wouldn’t spend any.14 -
Cloudworm said:Ok. Who did the Spivs buy it from?
Also how much did they buy the club, including the ground and Sparrows for, and how much did they sell it for?
Seems our demise is fundamentally linked to the value of the club which used to include real estate, but no longer does.
0 -
DOUCHER said:Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Cloudworm said:DOUCHER said:YannTheMann said:Gribbo said:Our players and manager are always going to be mediocre as long as we're League 1. Players who are 100% in all areas of their game don't tend to play in League 1, they're usually with Chelsea or City in the Prem.
CBT, for example, getting pelters for not being able to finish a move every time; yeah that's right, because if he did have the finishing touch every time, he wouldn't be playing for Charlton.
Just think the idea is to give a mediocre manager time and support, to get the best out of a team of mediocre players, who each make up for eachother's short falls. The only alternative to that, imo, is to invest heavily, or do a Wrexham and become fashionable overnight.
As someone who wasn't really following the club so closely during the Roland years, I beg the question; on the pitch, was it really that bad when you look back at it objectively? I know people invested a lot of time and emotion in the CARD stuff, so it might be hard to admit. However, our slide as a club seems to have a force beyond Roland and since he's left, it's worsened. He seemed to have us top of League 1/championship strugglers. Who wouldn't accept that right now?
I just wonder if what we are witnessing is the inevitable outcome of bad timing, premier League TV money allocation and escalating parachute payments since we were relegated from the prem. Even a new billionaire wouldn't be able to buy success as we don't have the revenue to satisfy the financial rules. In short, we've missed the boat and should probably accept it.0 -
DOUCHER said:swordfish said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:L1 is pretty poor this year and we're still way off the playoffs. No idea what the owners are expecting but we're hemorrhaging support and there is a growing division between fans and players.
They will never leave, destined for eternity to suffer whatever misfortune befalls their club. Others less tolerant are able to check out for a while, quite a long while in my case, thirteen years and counting, although I was at the play off final more recently of course. And who wasn't? What a day that was! So sad the opportunity was squandered.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Cloudworm said:Ok. Who did the Spivs buy it from?
Also how much did they buy the club, including the ground and Sparrows for, and how much did they sell it for?
Seems our demise is fundamentally linked to the value of the club which used to include real estate, but no longer does.7 -
Airman Brown said:Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Cloudworm said:DOUCHER said:YannTheMann said:Gribbo said:Our players and manager are always going to be mediocre as long as we're League 1. Players who are 100% in all areas of their game don't tend to play in League 1, they're usually with Chelsea or City in the Prem.
CBT, for example, getting pelters for not being able to finish a move every time; yeah that's right, because if he did have the finishing touch every time, he wouldn't be playing for Charlton.
Just think the idea is to give a mediocre manager time and support, to get the best out of a team of mediocre players, who each make up for eachother's short falls. The only alternative to that, imo, is to invest heavily, or do a Wrexham and become fashionable overnight.
As someone who wasn't really following the club so closely during the Roland years, I beg the question; on the pitch, was it really that bad when you look back at it objectively? I know people invested a lot of time and emotion in the CARD stuff, so it might be hard to admit. However, our slide as a club seems to have a force beyond Roland and since he's left, it's worsened. He seemed to have us top of League 1/championship strugglers. Who wouldn't accept that right now?
I just wonder if what we are witnessing is the inevitable outcome of bad timing, premier League TV money allocation and escalating parachute payments since we were relegated from the prem. Even a new billionaire wouldn't be able to buy success as we don't have the revenue to satisfy the financial rules. In short, we've missed the boat and should probably accept it.
Ipswich’s spending is of a different order to that under Powell. It’s sad some people still can’t understand that what he and others did was extraordinary, presumably because it just doesn’t fit their preferred narrative about him.0 -
Fumbluff said:Cloudworm said:Ok. Who did the Spivs buy it from?
Also how much did they buy the club, including the ground and Sparrows for, and how much did they sell it for?
Seems our demise is fundamentally linked to the value of the club which used to include real estate, but no longer does.
If this bores you, you don't have to contribute. Just do what most people do with your posts and skip them.2 -
Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Cloudworm said:DOUCHER said:YannTheMann said:Gribbo said:Our players and manager are always going to be mediocre as long as we're League 1. Players who are 100% in all areas of their game don't tend to play in League 1, they're usually with Chelsea or City in the Prem.
CBT, for example, getting pelters for not being able to finish a move every time; yeah that's right, because if he did have the finishing touch every time, he wouldn't be playing for Charlton.
Just think the idea is to give a mediocre manager time and support, to get the best out of a team of mediocre players, who each make up for eachother's short falls. The only alternative to that, imo, is to invest heavily, or do a Wrexham and become fashionable overnight.
As someone who wasn't really following the club so closely during the Roland years, I beg the question; on the pitch, was it really that bad when you look back at it objectively? I know people invested a lot of time and emotion in the CARD stuff, so it might be hard to admit. However, our slide as a club seems to have a force beyond Roland and since he's left, it's worsened. He seemed to have us top of League 1/championship strugglers. Who wouldn't accept that right now?
I just wonder if what we are witnessing is the inevitable outcome of bad timing, premier League TV money allocation and escalating parachute payments since we were relegated from the prem. Even a new billionaire wouldn't be able to buy success as we don't have the revenue to satisfy the financial rules. In short, we've missed the boat and should probably accept it.2 -
and ask the hull fans who have had their own roland situation0
-
DOUCHER said:Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Cloudworm said:DOUCHER said:YannTheMann said:Gribbo said:Our players and manager are always going to be mediocre as long as we're League 1. Players who are 100% in all areas of their game don't tend to play in League 1, they're usually with Chelsea or City in the Prem.
CBT, for example, getting pelters for not being able to finish a move every time; yeah that's right, because if he did have the finishing touch every time, he wouldn't be playing for Charlton.
Just think the idea is to give a mediocre manager time and support, to get the best out of a team of mediocre players, who each make up for eachother's short falls. The only alternative to that, imo, is to invest heavily, or do a Wrexham and become fashionable overnight.
As someone who wasn't really following the club so closely during the Roland years, I beg the question; on the pitch, was it really that bad when you look back at it objectively? I know people invested a lot of time and emotion in the CARD stuff, so it might be hard to admit. However, our slide as a club seems to have a force beyond Roland and since he's left, it's worsened. He seemed to have us top of League 1/championship strugglers. Who wouldn't accept that right now?
I just wonder if what we are witnessing is the inevitable outcome of bad timing, premier League TV money allocation and escalating parachute payments since we were relegated from the prem. Even a new billionaire wouldn't be able to buy success as we don't have the revenue to satisfy the financial rules. In short, we've missed the boat and should probably accept it.1 -
Back to the game (think many have forgot this is a match thread)…
Was noticeable that their goal came what felt like a full 1-2 mins after a corner where their two big centre half’s came up. After the corner broke down there must have been another 6 or 7 phases where of play where they could have returned back to defence but they both stayed up top.Was obviously a clear tactic and I’m not sure it reflected the fact they were confident they’d eventually get the ball wide again and thrown into the box, or they were relaxed that we were offering no attacking threat to worry about.
Either way, Beckles got his reward. I’m convinced for the other 91 clubs he wouldn’t have still been in the box at that stage.2 -
Cloudworm said:Ok. Who did the Spivs buy it from?
Also how much did they buy the club, including the ground and Sparrows for, and how much did they sell it for?
Seems our demise is fundamentally linked to the value of the club which used to include real estate, but no longer does.
I am not sure the point you are making but as has been pointed out to you above the club and ground were always owned by the same people (certainly in the last 30/40 years anyway) until RD separated them.
So, from memory, Murray pretty much gave the lot to the Spivs for almost nothing iirc, the Spivs sold to RD for £14M I think and he then separated them, sold the club for a £1 to Nimer/Southall who sold that for £1-2M to sandgaard who sold it for £10-12M to the current lot.
RD destroyed the fan base, funded us to remain in L1 and separated assets from club. He was the driving force of what we have now and his decision to sell to Southall who he knew was a wrong'un from his departing comments left us stuffed. He was and remains the worst thing to have happened to this club and I am utterly convinced of that. We would 100% not be better off if he was still in charge.13 -
Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Bailey said:DOUCHER said:Cloudworm said:DOUCHER said:YannTheMann said:Gribbo said:Our players and manager are always going to be mediocre as long as we're League 1. Players who are 100% in all areas of their game don't tend to play in League 1, they're usually with Chelsea or City in the Prem.
CBT, for example, getting pelters for not being able to finish a move every time; yeah that's right, because if he did have the finishing touch every time, he wouldn't be playing for Charlton.
Just think the idea is to give a mediocre manager time and support, to get the best out of a team of mediocre players, who each make up for eachother's short falls. The only alternative to that, imo, is to invest heavily, or do a Wrexham and become fashionable overnight.
As someone who wasn't really following the club so closely during the Roland years, I beg the question; on the pitch, was it really that bad when you look back at it objectively? I know people invested a lot of time and emotion in the CARD stuff, so it might be hard to admit. However, our slide as a club seems to have a force beyond Roland and since he's left, it's worsened. He seemed to have us top of League 1/championship strugglers. Who wouldn't accept that right now?
I just wonder if what we are witnessing is the inevitable outcome of bad timing, premier League TV money allocation and escalating parachute payments since we were relegated from the prem. Even a new billionaire wouldn't be able to buy success as we don't have the revenue to satisfy the financial rules. In short, we've missed the boat and should probably accept it.1 -
I do not understand the hate for MA, we have had his photo on this forum for years, every time there is talk of a new manager, (and there has been plenty), someone puts his photo up. Obviously some on here have wanted him for a long while. Happy new year 🤣🥳3
- Sponsored links:
-
AFKABartram said:Back to the game (think many have forgot this is a match thread)….2
-
Booing the likes of Asiimwe and Campbell when they’re young players (18 and 20 respectively) trying their best is nothing better than toxic.
Fans responsible for that kind of stuff do not deserve a successful football club. Be upset with the team in general if you must but singled out abuse which will actively destroy players is not on.
11 -
No one booed Asimwe and Campbell directly, nor was the 'fckin useless' chant aimed at them. Boos rang out after the goal and after several passages of poor play, and again after the final whistle.
Being in the away end, it seemed pretty clear that the voicing of displeasure was being aimed at the group and performance as a whole, not at individual players.
18 -
DOUCHER said:Off_it said:swords_alive said:1968CAFC said:Complete Shite !!
players, manager and owners are all taking the piss, otherwise they are all completely incompetent!!!0 -
Croydon said:No one booed Asimwe and Campbell directly, nor was the 'fckin useless' chant aimed at them. Boos rang out after the goal and after several passages of poor play, and again after the final whistle.
Being in the away end, it seemed pretty clear that the voicing of displeasure was being aimed at the group and performance as a whole, not at individual players.Other than that one incident I think the fans response was completely fair though3 -
NabySarr said:Croydon said:No one booed Asimwe and Campbell directly, nor was the 'fckin useless' chant aimed at them. Boos rang out after the goal and after several passages of poor play, and again after the final whistle.
Being in the away end, it seemed pretty clear that the voicing of displeasure was being aimed at the group and performance as a whole, not at individual players.Other than that one incident I think the fans response was completely fair thoughFor me the demise of the club is systemic, but it’s easier to look for scapegoats on the pitch.0 -
clive said:1
-
NabySarr said:Croydon said:No one booed Asimwe and Campbell directly, nor was the 'fckin useless' chant aimed at them. Boos rang out after the goal and after several passages of poor play, and again after the final whistle.
Being in the away end, it seemed pretty clear that the voicing of displeasure was being aimed at the group and performance as a whole, not at individual players.Other than that one incident I think the fans response was completely fair though
Does really highlight the demise of Campbell though. He is currently putting in some of the worst performances we've ever seen by a Charlton player, when he had initially shown some promise .
1 -
If we are sticking with Appleton and his tactics then Campbell needs a loan out as soon as the January window opens, see if he can have success lower down and come back a better player, as at the start of the season I really rated him as one to step up this season but looks completely destroyed at the moment.2
-
Croydon said:NabySarr said:Croydon said:No one booed Asimwe and Campbell directly, nor was the 'fckin useless' chant aimed at them. Boos rang out after the goal and after several passages of poor play, and again after the final whistle.
Being in the away end, it seemed pretty clear that the voicing of displeasure was being aimed at the group and performance as a whole, not at individual players.Other than that one incident I think the fans response was completely fair though
Does really highlight the demise of Campbell though. He is currently putting in some of the worst performances we've ever seen by a Charlton player, when he had initially shown some promise .
If we are honest, a lot of our youth have fallen off quite a bit. Asiimwe and Anderson started off so well, Nath looks pony now and Anderson doesn't even get a look in. Deji should have stayed at Bromley where it was good for his development.
Campbell and Kanu definitely should be on loan though, both shouldn't be anywhere near a league 1 squad right now.4