Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton Summer Transfer Rumours 2024

1389390392394395410

Comments

  • Marriott110
    Marriott110 Posts: 1,528
    Kanu would seemingly be 6th choice when Miles is fit behind Ahamde, Miles, Chuks, Godden and TC, a loan where we can recall him (ideally this is to the top of the national league) would probably be best for all involved
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,494
    Scoham said:
    Dizzle said:
    Scoham said:
    Mentions Kanu potentially going out on loan depending on how Leaburn is getting on
    Well Hylton still at the club so give him 6 month contract and send Kanu out 
    Only have to compare their records last season to see Kanu would offer a lot more on the pitch than Hylton.
    But what’s the point of Kanu being 5th choice we might as well use Hylton as 5th choice and allow Kanu to get more playing time .. surely makes sense 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,205
    Kanu would seemingly be 6th choice when Miles is fit behind Ahamde, Miles, Chuks, Godden and TC, a loan where we can recall him (ideally this is to the top of the national league) would probably be best for all involved
    I think Kanu deserves more than a national league loan. He did well last season and doesn't look out of place in L1
    Agree.

    That is the dilema for the club.

    Give him a L2 or even L1 loan to help him develop but no recall till January v NL loan where he'll shine but not be as tested but we can recall him
  • Bailey
    Bailey Posts: 3,265
    Scoham said:
    Dizzle said:
    Scoham said:
    Mentions Kanu potentially going out on loan depending on how Leaburn is getting on
    Well Hylton still at the club so give him 6 month contract and send Kanu out 
    Only have to compare their records last season to see Kanu would offer a lot more on the pitch than Hylton.
    But what’s the point of Kanu being 5th choice we might as well use Hylton as 5th choice and allow Kanu to get more playing time .. surely makes sense 
    You are right Ronnie. Young players need game time and that game time should be in someone's first team. I would suggest that Zach Mitchell, Nathan Asiimwe and Daniel Kanu are all in that position.  
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,365
    edited August 2024
    Scoham said:
    Dizzle said:
    Scoham said:
    Mentions Kanu potentially going out on loan depending on how Leaburn is getting on
    Well Hylton still at the club so give him 6 month contract and send Kanu out 
    Only have to compare their records last season to see Kanu would offer a lot more on the pitch than Hylton.
    But what’s the point of Kanu being 5th choice we might as well use Hylton as 5th choice and allow Kanu to get more playing time .. surely makes sense 
    We don’t need Hylton when Ahadme, Godden, Campbell, Aneke, Leaburn and Dixon would still be ahead of him if we loan out Kanu. He’d be 7 or 8th choice which is a waste of budget.
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,024
    Think if Kanu was available you'd have most of League 2 on the phone. Maybe even some lower L1 clubs? 
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,000
    Kanu would seemingly be 6th choice when Miles is fit behind Ahamde, Miles, Chuks, Godden and TC, a loan where we can recall him (ideally this is to the top of the national league) would probably be best for all involved
    I think Kanu deserves more than a national league loan. He did well last season and doesn't look out of place in L1
    Agree.

    That is the dilema for the club.

    Give him a L2 or even L1 loan to help him develop but no recall till January v NL loan where he'll shine but not be as tested but we can recall him
    I think it will be very important to choose the "right" club if he does go on loan. He's beyond the level where he'd benefit just from being in and around a squad, if that's the plan keep him here. He needs to be doing what he did at his last loan where he is actively playing and scoring.
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,494
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    Dizzle said:
    Scoham said:
    Mentions Kanu potentially going out on loan depending on how Leaburn is getting on
    Well Hylton still at the club so give him 6 month contract and send Kanu out 
    Only have to compare their records last season to see Kanu would offer a lot more on the pitch than Hylton.
    But what’s the point of Kanu being 5th choice we might as well use Hylton as 5th choice and allow Kanu to get more playing time .. surely makes sense 
    We don’t need Hylton when Ahadme, Godden, Campbell, Aneke, Leaburn and Dixon would still be ahead of him if we loan out Kanu. He’d be 7 or 8th choice which is a waste of budget.
    But at the moment we don’t know if Leaburn will
    have any set backs so we need Hylton as cover it’s precaution 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,835
    edited August 2024
    A risk to send Kanu out on an EFL loan when Miles won't be back for a couple of months, and Chuks is Chuks. 

    And he's way too good for the NL now.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Yann897
    Yann897 Posts: 1,530
    A risk to send Kanu out on an EFL loan when Miles won't be back for a couple of months, and Chuks is Chuks. 

    And he's way too good for the NL now.
    Miles is training now.
  • Hal1x
    Hal1x Posts: 4,265
    So much riches up top. Gone are the days where you hope Josh Davison is fit so you have a natural striker to play.
    and yet we still can only score one goal.
  • MartinCAFC
    MartinCAFC Posts: 3,218
    No point in Kanu going back to the NL on loan, if we’re worried about not being able to recall him if he goes to L1/L2 then he shouldn’t be going out on loan in the first place if we’re worried about being left short.

    Another way to look at it is from a developmental point of view. Look at Rak-Saki he was never going back to L1 after the season with us, the same should apply to Kanu it would be a backwards step to send him back to NL.
  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 15,780
    Uboat said:
    Sounds like there will be a flurry of activity before the end of the window - which is pretty exciting.
    I’m ready. 



    Thought this photo had been banned...🙄🤦‍♂️
    Put on hiatus until someone paid the sugar tax. 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,664
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    Dizzle said:
    Scoham said:
    Mentions Kanu potentially going out on loan depending on how Leaburn is getting on
    Well Hylton still at the club so give him 6 month contract and send Kanu out 
    Only have to compare their records last season to see Kanu would offer a lot more on the pitch than Hylton.
    But what’s the point of Kanu being 5th choice we might as well use Hylton as 5th choice and allow Kanu to get more playing time .. surely makes sense 
    We don’t need Hylton when Ahadme, Godden, Campbell, Aneke, Leaburn and Dixon would still be ahead of him if we loan out Kanu. He’d be 7 or 8th choice which is a waste of budget.
    But at the moment we don’t know if Leaburn will
    have any set backs so we need Hylton as cover it’s precaution 
    Other than in a coaching role I cannot see any reason why we need Hylton.
    I'd rather use any money we have on bringing in someone else. 
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,024
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    Dizzle said:
    Scoham said:
    Mentions Kanu potentially going out on loan depending on how Leaburn is getting on
    Well Hylton still at the club so give him 6 month contract and send Kanu out 
    Only have to compare their records last season to see Kanu would offer a lot more on the pitch than Hylton.
    But what’s the point of Kanu being 5th choice we might as well use Hylton as 5th choice and allow Kanu to get more playing time .. surely makes sense 
    We don’t need Hylton when Ahadme, Godden, Campbell, Aneke, Leaburn and Dixon would still be ahead of him if we loan out Kanu. He’d be 7 or 8th choice which is a waste of budget.
    But at the moment we don’t know if Leaburn will
    have any set backs so we need Hylton as cover it’s precaution 
    Other than in a coaching role I cannot see any reason why we need Hylton.
    I'd rather use any money we have on bringing in someone else. 

    Wouldn't bother with Hylton , felt more like a mate helping NJ out for preseason than anything serious. We've got Casey and Mbick we can use in the Bristol Street Motors Trophy and no one is going to have 6/7 senior strikers on the books. Would rather the budget was used where we need it. 
  • Kanu would seemingly be 6th choice when Miles is fit behind Ahamde, Miles, Chuks, Godden and TC, a loan where we can recall him (ideally this is to the top of the national league) would probably be best for all involved
    Ameke is unlikely to start games, and Leaburn isn't fit yet.

    So he's possibly 4th choice for 3 spots.  And that's before you factor on the fact Godden has had niggles already, and that Campbell is new to the position and it might not work out.

    Can see Kanu getting plenty of minutes for us, I'd not loan him out.
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,824
    I think Kanu will start a lot of games , as he did last season .  There are question marks over all 6 strikers in terms of either ability, form or fitness.  He was anonymous against Birmingham but he did well last season and is totally reliable in terms of fitness . 
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,342
    https://x.com/CHATHMuseum/status/1826894743906681152?t=LdbBzvcl9_4HjtXjhQ3Pog&s=19

    Getting ready for our handful of new signings,  hopefully  ;)
  • Starinnaddick
    Starinnaddick Posts: 4,342
    shine166 said:
    Gallagher wasn’t ours 
    We get a development fee 
    Do we get anything from Ian Maatsens move? 
  • Sponsored links:



  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,365
    Think Oli Norwood was suggested on here recently - Pete O’Rourke said he’s signing for Stockport.
  • Ferryman
    Ferryman Posts: 2,921
    Watching Notts County v Grimsby and County's Dan Crowley looks a bit of a player.
    Was impressive at The Valley for Birmingham in the Championship but didn't push on. Probably too much of a luxury player for NJ.
  • CL_Phantom
    CL_Phantom Posts: 5,512
    If we bring in a midfielder who's a real goal threat then would be ok with Kanu going to a decent loan.

    Ahadme 
    Godden 
    Dixon*
    TC
    Leaburn**
    Aneke***
    Goal scoring mid 

    Is plenty of options to grab a 1-0 win

    *Sparingly 
    ** Once fit
    ***Until injured 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,281
    edited August 2024
    If we bring in a midfielder who's a real goal threat then would be ok with Kanu going to a decent loan.

    Ahadme 
    Godden 
    Dixon*
    TC
    Leaburn**
    Aneke***
    Goal scoring mid 

    Is plenty of options to grab a 1-0 win

    *Sparingly 
    ** Once fit
    ***Until injured 
    With Dixon as another option we also don’t have to play 2 up front. Could easily switch to a 3-4-2-1 and play with any 2 of Berry/Dixon/Campbell in the 2 behind the striker. Would also allow Dixon and Campbell to get out wide where they are best 

    Doubt we are looking to add goal threat from midfield though. That’s what Docherty and Berry are here for. More likely to be looking at a Taylor replacement to compete with Coventry, and then maybe some creativity or physicality (probably the latter as it’s Jones) 
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,494
    MarcusH26 said:
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    Dizzle said:
    Scoham said:
    Mentions Kanu potentially going out on loan depending on how Leaburn is getting on
    Well Hylton still at the club so give him 6 month contract and send Kanu out 
    Only have to compare their records last season to see Kanu would offer a lot more on the pitch than Hylton.
    But what’s the point of Kanu being 5th choice we might as well use Hylton as 5th choice and allow Kanu to get more playing time .. surely makes sense 
    We don’t need Hylton when Ahadme, Godden, Campbell, Aneke, Leaburn and Dixon would still be ahead of him if we loan out Kanu. He’d be 7 or 8th choice which is a waste of budget.
    But at the moment we don’t know if Leaburn will
    have any set backs so we need Hylton as cover it’s precaution 
    Other than in a coaching role I cannot see any reason why we need Hylton.
    I'd rather use any money we have on bringing in someone else. 

    Wouldn't bother with Hylton , felt more like a mate helping NJ out for preseason than anything serious. We've got Casey and Mbick we can use in the Bristol Street Motors Trophy and no one is going to have 6/7 senior strikers on the books. Would rather the budget was used where we need it. 
    Casey and Mbick no where near ready first team yet .. we have no need to throw them in the deep end this season these two has could do with loans to Nat league or Nat League South … can never understand why we don’t set up
    agreement with Welling to send our younger players too ? for the next stage of their development 
  • Foxycafc
    Foxycafc Posts: 1,210
    From Gallagher’s transfer, we will get £180,000 as a solidarity contribution. We will also receive compensation for the cost of his training and education for a season, but I can’t be bothered to calculate that yet.
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,344
    MarcusH26 said:
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    Dizzle said:
    Scoham said:
    Mentions Kanu potentially going out on loan depending on how Leaburn is getting on
    Well Hylton still at the club so give him 6 month contract and send Kanu out 
    Only have to compare their records last season to see Kanu would offer a lot more on the pitch than Hylton.
    But what’s the point of Kanu being 5th choice we might as well use Hylton as 5th choice and allow Kanu to get more playing time .. surely makes sense 
    We don’t need Hylton when Ahadme, Godden, Campbell, Aneke, Leaburn and Dixon would still be ahead of him if we loan out Kanu. He’d be 7 or 8th choice which is a waste of budget.
    But at the moment we don’t know if Leaburn will
    have any set backs so we need Hylton as cover it’s precaution 
    Other than in a coaching role I cannot see any reason why we need Hylton.
    I'd rather use any money we have on bringing in someone else. 

    Wouldn't bother with Hylton , felt more like a mate helping NJ out for preseason than anything serious. We've got Casey and Mbick we can use in the Bristol Street Motors Trophy and no one is going to have 6/7 senior strikers on the books. Would rather the budget was used where we need it. 
    Casey and Mbick no where near ready first team yet .. we have no need to throw them in the deep end this season these two has could do with loans to Nat league or Nat League South … can never understand why we don’t set up
    agreement with Welling to send our younger players too ? for the next stage of their development 
    If you'd been following Welling over the past few years then you'd understand why.
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,671
    Foxycafc said:
    From Gallagher’s transfer, we will get £180,000 as a solidarity contribution. We will also receive compensation for the cost of his training and education for a season, but I can’t be bothered to calculate that yet.
    Not to be sniffed at in league 1. Lookman and Gomez on top would be brilliant 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,365
    shine166 said:
    Gallagher wasn’t ours 
    We get a development fee 
    Do we get anything from Ian Maatsens move? 
    Don’t think so as he’s moved between English clubs. Believe it applies when players move between clubs in different countries.
This discussion has been closed.