Online fan meeting with club directors - next one Thurs Jan 23rd 7pm (p8)
Comments
-
That might be because they were misled on this point? The new chief exec is on record as saying that anyone with basic competence can get the operating loss down to £1m-£2m and cover that with player sales. Nobody who knows the business believes that is possible.Lordflashheart said:
LOL all you like - chat was credible TBH - owners are stunned by the amount of money they have to put inLordflashheart said:
Ex playerDazzler21 said:
Where did you hear that?Lordflashheart said:I’ve learned this evening that they already want out, and open to selling the club, welcoming offers……
The grim reality of the ££££££’s needed to even stand still owning CAFC ……7 -
Scott’s position is untenable (which is good news).7
-
Why do you say that ?Airman Brown said:Scott’s position is untenable (which is good news).
Because of his apparent demotion from
the board or are you aware of other changes?0 -
Remember this cobblers about Ged Roddy?valleynick66 said:
Why do you say that ?Airman Brown said:Scott’s position is untenable (which is good news).
Because of his apparent demotion from
the board or are you aware of other changes?“I’ll still be able to support in various capacities and I look forward to seeing the club continue to progress.”
Sandgaard added: “Ged has done a lot of important work during his time at the club and while we wish him the best for the future, I’m sure we’ll still see him around a lot as he’ll be helping us on upcoming projects.”
This will be another iteration, if indeed the club even mentions Scott again.5 -
Thanks. I see your point but didn’t read it as bluntly as effectively already gone.Airman Brown said:
Remember this cobblers about Ged Roddy?valleynick66 said:
Why do you say that ?Airman Brown said:Scott’s position is untenable (which is good news).
Because of his apparent demotion from
the board or are you aware of other changes?“I’ll still be able to support in various capacities and I look forward to seeing the club continue to progress.”
Sandgaard added: “Ged has done a lot of important work during his time at the club and while we wish him the best for the future, I’m sure we’ll still see him around a lot as he’ll be helping us on upcoming projects.”
This will be another iteration, if indeed the club even mentions Scott again.Would that suggest that Rodwell instead is the ‘negotiator’ when it comes to trying to land Jones’s targets?1 -
I think that’s where we’ll end up.valleynick66 said:
Thanks. I see your point but didn’t read it as bluntly as effectively already gone.Airman Brown said:
Remember this cobblers about Ged Roddy?valleynick66 said:
Why do you say that ?Airman Brown said:Scott’s position is untenable (which is good news).
Because of his apparent demotion from
the board or are you aware of other changes?“I’ll still be able to support in various capacities and I look forward to seeing the club continue to progress.”
Sandgaard added: “Ged has done a lot of important work during his time at the club and while we wish him the best for the future, I’m sure we’ll still see him around a lot as he’ll be helping us on upcoming projects.”
This will be another iteration, if indeed the club even mentions Scott again.Would that suggest that Rodwell instead is the ‘negotiator’ when it comes to trying to land Jones’s targets?1 -
Hopefully he's out the door.Airman Brown said:
Remember this cobblers about Ged Roddy?valleynick66 said:
Why do you say that ?Airman Brown said:Scott’s position is untenable (which is good news).
Because of his apparent demotion from
the board or are you aware of other changes?“I’ll still be able to support in various capacities and I look forward to seeing the club continue to progress.”
Sandgaard added: “Ged has done a lot of important work during his time at the club and while we wish him the best for the future, I’m sure we’ll still see him around a lot as he’ll be helping us on upcoming projects.”
This will be another iteration, if indeed the club even mentions Scott again.
Utterly useless in everything he does2 -
Airman Brown said:
I think that’s where we’ll end up.valleynick66 said:
Thanks. I see your point but didn’t read it as bluntly as effectively already gone.Airman Brown said:
Remember this cobblers about Ged Roddy?valleynick66 said:
Why do you say that ?Airman Brown said:Scott’s position is untenable (which is good news).
Because of his apparent demotion from
the board or are you aware of other changes?“I’ll still be able to support in various capacities and I look forward to seeing the club continue to progress.”
Sandgaard added: “Ged has done a lot of important work during his time at the club and while we wish him the best for the future, I’m sure we’ll still see him around a lot as he’ll be helping us on upcoming projects.”
This will be another iteration, if indeed the club even mentions Scott again.Would that suggest that Rodwell instead is the ‘negotiator’ when it comes to trying to land Jones’s targets?As we should.Rodwell, it would appear, is managing the football side of things through Jones and is therefore best placed to do the negotiations (with a lawyer supporting, I would suggest).Methven is on the commercial side and as he said months ago (and I agreed through my own experience) that the football and commercial side should be kept separate as no one person has both sets of skills.4 -
I’m less worried about the clock, it’s the fan base running down that will be a key one to watch if we don’t get promotion at the end of this season. The EFL/Sky deal will make buying a more expensive season ticket less attractive for many (has that ‘7,000 Addicks’ ST sales number been upgraded yet ?) and losing Dobson and now May by the looks of it isn’t a great indicator for encouraging fans to go to games. Less fans going to the Valley in a promotion winning year is a path that ended up at SelhurstAirman Brown said:
People who argue we don’t need to worry about The Valley because the lease runs until 2035 please note. That is not a secure basis for investment in the club, which is what I have always said.Callumcafc said:"Update with regard to purchasing the Valley and Sparrows Lane?""Thorny topic ... we are with the fans here, we weren't the ones who separated the assets from the club ... the first thing is about security of tenure, we need to make sure Charlton can play here medium to long term ... whether that means buying or a long lease extension ... having a short term lease is a challenge because you're effectively spending money on someone else's house and they can raise the rent after you've made any improvements... ongoing talks with the landlord to ensure the Valley remains long term home of Charlton Athletic ... there have been initial conversations and it's something we will pursue with all of our mighty because we want to make sure Charlton is playing at the Valley for as long as we can"
Whether it can be resolved cheaply I doubt, but it is a significant problem and will get worse as the clock runs down.0 -
7,200 season tickets sold.1
- Sponsored links:
-
Failure to invest in the stadium is the path that led to Selhurst.letthegoodtimesroll said:
I’m less worried about the clock, it’s the fan base running down that will be a key one to watch if we don’t get promotion at the end of this season. The EFL/Sky deal will make buying a more expensive season ticket less attractive for many (has that ‘7,000 Addicks’ ST sales number been upgraded yet ?) and losing Dobson and now May by the looks of it isn’t a great indicator for encouraging fans to go to games. Less fans going to the Valley in a promotion winning year is a path that ended up at SelhurstAirman Brown said:
People who argue we don’t need to worry about The Valley because the lease runs until 2035 please note. That is not a secure basis for investment in the club, which is what I have always said.Callumcafc said:"Update with regard to purchasing the Valley and Sparrows Lane?""Thorny topic ... we are with the fans here, we weren't the ones who separated the assets from the club ... the first thing is about security of tenure, we need to make sure Charlton can play here medium to long term ... whether that means buying or a long lease extension ... having a short term lease is a challenge because you're effectively spending money on someone else's house and they can raise the rent after you've made any improvements... ongoing talks with the landlord to ensure the Valley remains long term home of Charlton Athletic ... there have been initial conversations and it's something we will pursue with all of our mighty because we want to make sure Charlton is playing at the Valley for as long as we can"
Whether it can be resolved cheaply I doubt, but it is a significant problem and will get worse as the clock runs down.3 -
Agreed but we’ve literally had the same person running one and now the other.bobmunro said:Airman Brown said:
I think that’s where we’ll end up.valleynick66 said:
Thanks. I see your point but didn’t read it as bluntly as effectively already gone.Airman Brown said:
Remember this cobblers about Ged Roddy?valleynick66 said:
Why do you say that ?Airman Brown said:Scott’s position is untenable (which is good news).
Because of his apparent demotion from
the board or are you aware of other changes?“I’ll still be able to support in various capacities and I look forward to seeing the club continue to progress.”
Sandgaard added: “Ged has done a lot of important work during his time at the club and while we wish him the best for the future, I’m sure we’ll still see him around a lot as he’ll be helping us on upcoming projects.”
This will be another iteration, if indeed the club even mentions Scott again.Would that suggest that Rodwell instead is the ‘negotiator’ when it comes to trying to land Jones’s targets?As we should.Rodwell, it would appear, is managing the football side of things through Jones and is therefore best placed to do the negotiations (with a lawyer supporting, I would suggest).Methven is on the commercial side and as he said months ago (and I agreed through my own experience) that the football and commercial side should be kept separate as no one person has both sets of skills.0 -
https://www.charltonafc.com/news/take-part-online-fan-meeting-club-hierachy
Supporters can take part in the club’s bi-annual Meet The Directors fan meeting on Thursday, January 23rd at 7pm GMT.
The meetings, which form part of the club’s new Fan Engagement Framework, give supporters the opportunity to put questions live to members of the club’s Board and men’s first-team Manager Nathan Jones.
The CharltonTV show, hosted by Charlotte Richardson, will be streamed for free on the club’s YouTube channel, website and app. As with the two previous meetings, a representative from Charlton Athletic Supporters’ Trust (CAST) and Fan Advocates Lucy Bishop and Lewis Catt will join via Zoom to ask questions. Supporters will also have the opportunity to submit their questions live via email (website@cafc.co.uk) and WhatsApp on 07384 517580.
As part of the production, it will be announced which two supporters will be voted on to the Charlton Advisory Board. Voting for the Charlton Advisory Board closes at 11.59pm on Wednesday, January 22nd. Click here to find out more on the candidates and to register your vote.
Speakers at the meeting will include:
- Chairman of the Board: Gavin Carter
- Chief Executive Officer: Charlie Methven
- Managing Director: James Rodwell
- Men’s first-team Manager: Nathan Jones
1 -
No Andy Scott again0
-
Busy working on his list of excuses for the transfer window inactivity.fenaddick said:No Andy Scott again0 -
Will the fan advocate roles be defunct once the advisory board two are announced, or are they intended to be completely different roles?3
-
That's because Jones is in total control of player recruitment, so we are told.fenaddick said:No Andy Scott again0 -
Might be worth making this a sticky and editing the title, as it's quite short notice and easily missed2
- Sponsored links:
-
@killerandflash yep, good idea.
1 -
Does anyone know if it will be possible to play back the meeting at a later date?0
-
It’s being streamed on YouTube so you should be able to re-watch the streamCheshireAddick said:Does anyone know if it will be possible to play back the meeting at a later date?3 -
Can someone please ask when we will stop selling our best players, thank you.3
-
Looking forward to hearing the excuses regarding the pitch.0
-
Finance director still hiding then.1
-
Clem_Snide said:Looking forward to hearing the excuses regarding the pitch.We were aware it would take time to settle down.We know what work needs to be done in the summer.0
-
We have nine secure seasons left at The Valley. Cutting through all the crap, the one substantive thing this board could do off the pitch is to extend that. I think it will be hard to do, because of RD, and I don't think Charlie and his chums have the interest in it to make it happen because they don't plan to be here in 2034/35. I don't expect a running commentary or even care what they say about it in the meantime, but if they did actually manage it I'd consider that important progress.
Those who think it's not urgent should consider that the lease has already run for five of its 15 years and no third party in their right mind will be investing in (subsidising) a club that is at risk of losing its ground in under five. Tick tock.34 -
Yeah but Oxford United are holding their own.0
-
Lets not waste the time we are given
this Thursday by asking the wrong questions.
How have talks gone with Roland in regards to getting The Valley back in the hands of The football club.
The future of our club should be everyone’s concern.7
