Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Barclays Outage.

124

Comments

  • My point is they do invest but it’s a massive undertaking and high risk to resolve all legacy technology issues. And much harder for the older / long established brands. 

    Most of the time things work but ‘Money’ is so emotive when it goes wrong it’s much much worse. 
    They invest in knackered out green screen tech, bilecause the choice has been not to improve their tech for a range of reasons, and they are stuck as their new competitors are building up the numbers at a rate of knots 
  • edited February 2
    I hope the same never happens at coutts who I bank with.
    Well, it's a part of Nat West of course, so anything is possible. But is separately authorised which is good (unlike Halifax which is merely a trading name.)


    As for Barclays, well, you just have to look at their FCA fines history to know what a useless shambles they are. (I'm sure another one will be on its way now for inadequate systems and controls.)  Here are the highlights:

    2009 £2.45mn
    2011 £7.7mn
    2012 £59.5mn
    2014 (two fines) £63.8mn
    2015 (two fines) £356.4mn
    2020 £26.1mn
    2022 (two fines) £10.8mn
    2024 £10mn.

    You have to seriously question their competence.

    Edited to add: Mrs cafcfan has an account with them including a travel wallet facility which is okay.
  • Rothko said:
    They invest in knackered out green screen tech, bilecause the choice has been not to improve their tech for a range of reasons, and they are stuck as their new competitors are building up the numbers at a rate of knots 
    Yes legacy stuff is old tech. 

    The new entrants have the relative advantage of not having to migrate systems processes and customers to new platforms. That’s the challenge.  
  • I've been a Barclays customer for 55 years and can safely say their tech is awful.  Even now their app has an appalling feature regarding payees.  If you don't make a payment to a payee for 12 months it gets dropped from your list and has to be set up again with all the risks that entails.  But it’s worse than that.  To keep a payee you must make an immediate payment within 12 months.  Setting up a payment in advance, as I did with credit card bills to be paid just before they were due, doesn't count as far as Barclays are concerned.  I cannot conceive of setting up a system to work in this way especially without notifying the customer. 
  • Part of Nat West Group
    Only joking. I bank with Hali Fax
  • Only joking. I bank with Hali Fax
    yes, I totally appreciate from the criteria to have Coutts accounts, that the number who qualify on CL, is quite low!
  • Highly unlikely internet banking would be down across multiple banks though and you don't need internet banking to pay a bill by credit car - hence why the second payment card needs to be with a completely different banking group. For us it has proven worth doing on so many occasions, I honestly couldn't tell you how many times - many of which were when overseas
    I get what you're saying, but exactly how much money are people supposed to spread over how many accounts ?. Barclays online was down too, so if that's your main bank you're fkd no matter what is all I'm saying. 

    I use a Revolut card abroad, but that's a completely different kind of situation. 
     
  • Rothko said:
    I don’t get why people are so loyal to banks, the incumbents treat their customers like shit. 
    The Dominic West Nationwide adverts are in fact a mini-documentary...
  • Sponsored links:


  • Rothko said:
    I don’t get why people are so loyal to banks, the incumbents treat their customers like shit. 
    Nationwide have been good for me. Maybe because they're still a Building Society - but I don't get any hard sell, they've never tried to charge me for shit I don't want, and never any tech issues. 
  • edited February 2
    Nationwide have been good for me. Maybe because they're still a Building Society - but I don't get any hard sell, they've never tried to charge me for shit I don't want, and never any tech issues. 
    Agree. Been with them for donkeys years, and never any problem. And now they've started rewarding their members financially in good years, it's even better.
  • Nationwide have been good for me. Maybe because they're still a Building Society - but I don't get any hard sell, they've never tried to charge me for shit I don't want, and never any tech issues. 
    Our joint account was with Nationwide, but basics like setting up a payment or the app was such a ball ache we upped and left to Starling. Mortgages still there, and agreed the building society ethos is really important. 
  • shine166 said:
    I get what you're saying, but exactly how much money are people supposed to spread over how many accounts ?. Barclays online was down too, so if that's your main bank you're fkd no matter what is all I'm saying. 

    I use a Revolut card abroad, but that's a completely different kind of situation. 
     
    you don't have to spread any money to have a backup credit card so you can at least pay for things. If you want a single back up current account, keep £500 in it - that is all. Just ensure they are from different banking groups
  • edited February 3
    Hal1x said:
    Thanks for reminding me, Barclays were basatrds
    I think both were and are bastards. The good old Woolwich miss-sold me an endowment mortgage and Barclays who took over my mortgage and current account fought me for a further 2 years. 

  • Nationwide have been good for me. Maybe because they're still a Building Society - but I don't get any hard sell, they've never tried to charge me for shit I don't want, and never any tech issues. 
    I do find their ad about not closing branches a bit ironic, given they closed all but one of the branches in the SE postcodes a few years ago. And for the past three years they've been sending me an annual summary for a credit card that I cancelled before the pandemic, despite the fact that every year I phone them up to tell them so, and ask them to make sure it is properly closed now. So maybe not as shit as some of the others, but still a bit shit.
  • edited February 3
    I work for a bank here in my country. We don't charge anything for personal current accounts/debit accounts, credit accounts or online banking services like domestic money transfer. And this is the standard practice among all banks here. An outage like this one with Barclays would be simply unimaginable here (meaning it can't happen at all). The food bank answer to customers is... wow, I'm speechless. Your banks really got some nerve... They literally treat the customers like idiots... Or there's simply no competition in your banking industry? It beggars belief.
  • Barclays emailed me earlier (they're my corporate bank)

    Apparently all is back up and working 
  • I work for an fx/international payments company and our UK bank is Barclays 

    we were unable to make loads of currency payments as we just hadn’t received our clients GBP payments. 
  • Jessie said:
    I work for a bank here in my country. We don't charge anything for personal current accounts/debit accounts, credit accounts or online banking services like domestic money transfer. And this is the standard practice among all banks here. An outage like this one with Barclays would be simply unimaginable here (meaning it can't happen at all). The food bank answer to customers is... wow, I'm speechless. Your banks really got some nerve... They literally treat the customers like idiots... Or there's simply no competition in your banking industry? It beggars belief.
    It's partly about competition. In the banking sector over the last 20-30 years the 4 big players have effectively hoovered up every smaller player in existence. It's only in the last couple years when the online banks the likes of Monzo and revolut have come in and given a bit of a shake up. What that concentration of market share over the past couple decades has meant is extreme oligopoly power in the sector leading to 2 things. A race to the bottom in terms of service with the customer getting screwed and both overt an tacit collusion between the big players meaning very little to choose between them in terms of price/products. And allowed them to make profits that are "economically excess" It's a story that's been repeated across so many industries in the UK in the last 30 years. 

    That and the 50 year direction of constant tax cuts and deregulation for big business in the hope it will fuel some growth has given rise to untold concentration of power in large corporations and influence over government. In the banking sector (ill admit its investment banking rathervthan retail but the 2 are linked) all of the post 2008 crash measures that were put in place to guard against have been gradually rolled back. Additional taxes removed and regulations removed or watered down. All in the hope that we will get a financial services led economic boom like the early 2000s but ignoring the fact that the economic conditions that made that boom possible no longer exist 
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited February 3
    I agree that a few banks stitched up the high street. But as high street branches are going the same way as the dodo, that is no longer so important.

    However there is certainly competition in the UK banking industry.

    Here's a recent list of banks authorised to accept deposits, both UK incorporated and foreign.
    https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/authorisations/which-firms-does-the-pra-regulate/2024/list-of-banks/bank-list-2404.pdf

    As you can see, it's a long list and the likes of Monzo and Starling have certainly shaken up the big players (I have accounts at both, Cater Allen and also Virgin Money (really Clydesdale Bank and now owned by Nationwide).  

    In the past, there was certainly inertia among UK consumers - they opened an account with a bank and stayed there until they died. That situation started to change with the arrival of Metro Bank on the high street. It is certainly true that the big banks need a kicking.

    Anyway, my advice for what it is worth is, of course, not to put all your eggs in one basket. Having multiple banks/credit cards is a good idea. In particular, if you are fortunate enough to have more than £85k with a financial institution you should consider having it in various institutions in different groups, so that you don't hit the limit for the FSCS compensation scheme just in case the business does a Northern Rock.  (Joint accounts get £85k protection per person.)

    Edited to add: Just for the sake of clarity, the likes of Revolut are not banks but electronic money institutions. Any money with them is not covered by the FSCS scheme. (In Revolut's case they seem to use something called safeguarding which involves having funds in another third party institution.)
  • cafcfan said:
    I agree that a few banks stitched up the high street. But as high street branches are going the same way as the dodo, that is no longer so important.

    However there is certainly competition in the UK banking industry.

    Here's a recent list of banks authorised to accept deposits, both UK incorporated and foreign.
    https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/authorisations/which-firms-does-the-pra-regulate/2024/list-of-banks/bank-list-2404.pdf

    As you can see, it's a long list and the likes of Monzo and Starling have certainly shaken up the big players (I have accounts at both, Cater Allen and also Virgin Money (really Clydesdale Bank and now owned by Nationwide).  

    In the past, there was certainly inertia among UK consumers - they opened an account with a bank and stayed there until they died. That situation started to change with the arrival of Metro Bank on the high street. It is certainly true that the big banks need a kicking.

    Anyway, my advice for what it is worth is, of course, not to put all your eggs in one basket. Having multiple banks/credit cards is a good idea. In particular, if you are fortunate enough to have more than £85k with a financial institution you should consider having it in various institutions in different groups, so that you don't hit the limit for the FSCS compensation scheme just in case the business does a Northern Rock.  (Joint accounts get £85k protection per person.)

    Edited to add: Just for the sake of clarity, the likes of Revolut are not banks but electronic money institutions. Any money with them is not covered by the FSCS scheme. (In Revolut's case they seem to use something called safeguarding which involves having funds in another third party institution.)
    Definitely -all good advice. And yes re the no more than £85k with one institution - need to keep up-to-date on who are part of the same group
  • Jessie said:
    I work for a bank here in my country. We don't charge anything for personal current accounts/debit accounts, credit accounts or online banking services like domestic money transfer. And this is the standard practice among all banks here. An outage like this one with Barclays would be simply unimaginable here (meaning it can't happen at all). The food bank answer to customers is... wow, I'm speechless. Your banks really got some nerve... They literally treat the customers like idiots... Or there's simply no competition in your banking industry? It beggars belief.

    The UK also does not typically charge, there are certain credit cards you can opt to pay for as they give you rewards for doing so but we have a free personal banking service in the main.

    To say a banking outage cannot happen at all in China is an incredibly naive view. 
  • Also worth pointing out with Revolut, is they now have a banking license, so will have the FCSC protections, however queasy it makes you feel about them 
  • Jessie said:
    I work for a bank here in my country. We don't charge anything for personal current accounts/debit accounts, credit accounts or online banking services like domestic money transfer. And this is the standard practice among all banks here. An outage like this one with Barclays would be simply unimaginable here (meaning it can't happen at all). The food bank answer to customers is... wow, I'm speechless. Your banks really got some nerve... They literally treat the customers like idiots... Or there's simply no competition in your banking industry? It beggars belief.
    With the best will in the world, you're in a *slightly* different situation in China... 
  • shine166 said:
    There are nearly 9m people with zero savings, expecting them to have £500 sat in a account 'just incase' is not realistic. 
    I never said I expected anyone to do anything. I never said have £500 balance.
    Lots of ways to do it.  Looks like you are confusing a balance of £500 with an emergency credit limit on a credit card of £500

  • The UK also does not typically charge, there are certain credit cards you can opt to pay for as they give you rewards for doing so but we have a free personal banking service in the main.

    To say a banking outage cannot happen at all in China is an incredibly naive view. 
    My banking has gone down before in China. 
  • edited February 3
    Just landed In Belfast and had hired a car on my Barclay card. The card doesn’t even seem to be working. 🤬
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!