Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Paul Elliott (The other one) has taken the club to court

124

Comments

  • JohnnyH2
    JohnnyH2 Posts: 5,344
    https://x.com/TheCharltonWay/status/1904257541191999687?t=dBeYgw6raN7zodHIe20CYA&s=19
  • Rudders22
    Rudders22 Posts: 3,865
    isn't that a conflict of interest between Farnell and Paul Eliotttt. plus i know on another Companies house. Bassini and Farnell are part of another company. 
  • Clem_Snide
    Clem_Snide Posts: 11,741
    Surprised the stupid little fucker had the £11 it cost to file the case.....
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 26,299
    Oh arse, now I've got "I wish I could fly" going round in my head.
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,811
    Wasn't that Orville not Chuckles?
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 26,299
    Yes, but with Keith Harris, whose similarity to Paul El(l)iot(t) was the reason for the picture in the first place.
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,462
    All this to get the £11 back he paid for us back then!

  • Rock Spectacle
    Rock Spectacle Posts: 1,442
    Unless something has changed in the last 24 hours, Charlton Athletic Football Club is not a legal entity. Document doesn't look anything like anything I've seen before, smacks of desperation or a balls up. Or both...
  • West2003
    West2003 Posts: 386
    Sorry to disappoint but the £11 is what you have to pay to download the document in question from that website.
  • Sponsored links:



  • SantaClaus
    SantaClaus Posts: 7,658
    edited March 25
    £1 for the club and now £11 for the download. These guys are serious.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,782
    AFKABartram said:


    This pic from @Gribbo still cracks me up
    I laugh every time I see it
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,811
    aliwibble said:
    Yes, but with Keith Harris, whose similarity to Paul El(l)iot(t) was the reason for the picture in the first place.
    Fair enough, Paul does look very very like a young Keith Harris. 
  • Dippenhall
    Dippenhall Posts: 3,919
    Rock Spectacle said:
    Unless something has changed in the last 24 hours, Charlton Athletic Football Club is not a legal entity. Document doesn't look anything like anything I've seen before, smacks of desperation or a balls up. Or both...
    I once filed a routine claim against “Companies House” to get a company-reinstatement and papers could not be issued until the Defendant was changed to “The Registrar Companies House” since Companies House is not a legal entity.

    So not sure how papers have been effectively served on CAFC.
  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,742
    Dippenhall said:
    Rock Spectacle said:
    Unless something has changed in the last 24 hours, Charlton Athletic Football Club is not a legal entity. Document doesn't look anything like anything I've seen before, smacks of desperation or a balls up. Or both...
    I once filed a routine claim against “Companies House” to get a company-reinstatement and papers could not be issued until the Defendant was changed to “The Registrar Companies House” since Companies House is not a legal entity.

    So not sure how papers have been effectively served on CAFC.
    All of a piece with these people though. How on earth did they leave the legal space for Sandgaard to buy the club from ESI?
  • AndyG
    AndyG Posts: 5,911
    will we ever be free from these chancers !!! 

    Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiots 
  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,742
    AndyG said:
    will we ever be free from these chancers !!! 

    Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiots 
    Even idiots are entitled to competent legal representation though. It’s not clear they have it.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,156
    Airman Brown said:
    Dippenhall said:
    Rock Spectacle said:
    Unless something has changed in the last 24 hours, Charlton Athletic Football Club is not a legal entity. Document doesn't look anything like anything I've seen before, smacks of desperation or a balls up. Or both...
    I once filed a routine claim against “Companies House” to get a company-reinstatement and papers could not be issued until the Defendant was changed to “The Registrar Companies House” since Companies House is not a legal entity.

    So not sure how papers have been effectively served on CAFC.
    All of a piece with these people though. How on earth did they leave the legal space for Sandgaard to buy the club from ESI?
    Well in the same way that their "respected" sports lawyer left the physical space for Darren New and his mates to pop round, bearing flowers,  for a cup of tea with him and Dave Jones at his office. 

    Probably my favourite moment of that whole tawdry saga.
  • AndyG
    AndyG Posts: 5,911
    Airman Brown said:
    AndyG said:
    will we ever be free from these chancers !!! 

    Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiots 
    Even idiots are entitled to competent legal representation though. It’s not clear they have it.
    Are you suggesting Farnell is competent? 

    I feel he is parasite who leeches onto situations where he can try to exploit situations for his own gain competency has nothing to do with it. His methods seem to be make enough of a nuisance and hope someone settles rather than deal with the agro
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,056
    Farnell has conveniently only ticked the box that says “The Claimant (Elliott) believes that the facts stated in these particulars of claim are true” and not the one which says “I believe that the facts stated…”. 

    Trying to cover himself being charged with contempt of court for anyone who makes a false statement. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,056
    AndyG said:
    Airman Brown said:
    AndyG said:
    will we ever be free from these chancers !!! 

    Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiots 
    Even idiots are entitled to competent legal representation though. It’s not clear they have it.
    Are you suggesting Farnell is competent? 

    I feel he is parasite who leeches onto situations where he can try to exploit situations for his own gain competency has nothing to do with it. His methods seem to be make enough of a nuisance and hope someone settles rather than deal with the agro
    AB’s 2nd sentence answers your own. 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,636
    AndyG said:
    Airman Brown said:
    AndyG said:
    will we ever be free from these chancers !!! 

    Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiots 
    Even idiots are entitled to competent legal representation though. It’s not clear they have it.
    Are you suggesting Farnell is competent? 

    The SRA believe so. 
  • orpingtonRED
    orpingtonRED Posts: 3,474
    AFKABartram said:


    This pic from @Gribbo still cracks me up
    I love his detailing on the seats. Propa

  • Hartleypete
    Hartleypete Posts: 4,700
    So what’s happened.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,360
    I'll pay the £12 if it means he disappears forever. 
  • Pedro45
    Pedro45 Posts: 5,824
    Hartleypete said:
    So what’s happened.
    I'm not sure if anything has. The case tracker website is updated daily but doesn't show a hearing date from what I can see. The hearing (presuming it will last less than two days) has to be logged by the end of this month for the trial to then happen between June and October. (If a longer trial is expected, it won't be heard until 2026!)
  • king addick
    king addick Posts: 3,705
    How is this fucking ferret still knocking about? 

    Him and Farnell need to take a long walk off a short pier. Chancers!
  • Pedro45
    Pedro45 Posts: 5,824
    This happened on the case today - 

    Order by Master Order - Order dated 25/3/25 sealed and sent to serving party by email

    Don't know what it means, but will try to find out...
  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,490

    In relation to a court case, "Order by Master Order" typically means that a Master of the court (a judicial officer, often below the level of a judge) has issued an order that governs the case. This could be an administrative or procedural ruling rather than a substantive judgment.

    Possible Meanings:

    1. Procedural Direction – The Master has issued an order outlining how the case should proceed, such as deadlines, discovery procedures, or case management.

    2. Case Management Decision – The Master has decided on preliminary matters before the case goes before a judge.

    3. Final Order on Specific Issues – In some jurisdictions, Masters have authority to make binding decisions on certain matters, such as default judgments, cost awards, or minor disputes.

  • Bod
    Bod Posts: 178
    The man is a clueless gimp.

Categories

“Marketplace”