Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Paul Elliott (The other one) has taken the club to court
Comments
-
isn't that a conflict of interest between Farnell and Paul Eliotttt. plus i know on another Companies house. Bassini and Farnell are part of another company.1
-
Surprised the stupid little fucker had the £11 it cost to file the case.....4
-
27
-
Oh arse, now I've got "I wish I could fly" going round in my head.2
-
Wasn't that Orville not Chuckles?
0 -
Yes, but with Keith Harris, whose similarity to Paul El(l)iot(t) was the reason for the picture in the first place.0
-
All this to get the £11 back he paid for us back then!
3 -
Unless something has changed in the last 24 hours, Charlton Athletic Football Club is not a legal entity. Document doesn't look anything like anything I've seen before, smacks of desperation or a balls up. Or both...1
-
Sorry to disappoint but the £11 is what you have to pay to download the document in question from that website.2
- Sponsored links:
-
£1 for the club and now £11 for the download. These guys are serious.10
-
AFKABartram said:1
-
aliwibble said:Yes, but with Keith Harris, whose similarity to Paul El(l)iot(t) was the reason for the picture in the first place.0
-
Rock Spectacle said:Unless something has changed in the last 24 hours, Charlton Athletic Football Club is not a legal entity. Document doesn't look anything like anything I've seen before, smacks of desperation or a balls up. Or both...
So not sure how papers have been effectively served on CAFC.2 -
Dippenhall said:Rock Spectacle said:Unless something has changed in the last 24 hours, Charlton Athletic Football Club is not a legal entity. Document doesn't look anything like anything I've seen before, smacks of desperation or a balls up. Or both...
So not sure how papers have been effectively served on CAFC.3 -
will we ever be free from these chancers !!!Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiots0
-
AndyG said:will we ever be free from these chancers !!!Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiots7
-
Airman Brown said:Dippenhall said:Rock Spectacle said:Unless something has changed in the last 24 hours, Charlton Athletic Football Club is not a legal entity. Document doesn't look anything like anything I've seen before, smacks of desperation or a balls up. Or both...
So not sure how papers have been effectively served on CAFC.
Probably my favourite moment of that whole tawdry saga.6 -
Airman Brown said:AndyG said:will we ever be free from these chancers !!!Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiotsI feel he is parasite who leeches onto situations where he can try to exploit situations for his own gain competency has nothing to do with it. His methods seem to be make enough of a nuisance and hope someone settles rather than deal with the agro0
-
Farnell has conveniently only ticked the box that says “The Claimant (Elliott) believes that the facts stated in these particulars of claim are true” and not the one which says “I believe that the facts stated…”.Trying to cover himself being charged with contempt of court for anyone who makes a false statement.1
- Sponsored links:
-
AndyG said:Airman Brown said:AndyG said:will we ever be free from these chancers !!!Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiotsI feel he is parasite who leeches onto situations where he can try to exploit situations for his own gain competency has nothing to do with it. His methods seem to be make enough of a nuisance and hope someone settles rather than deal with the agro5
-
AndyG said:Airman Brown said:AndyG said:will we ever be free from these chancers !!!Farnell seems to have a business based on representing idiots1
-
9
-
So what’s happened.0
-
I'll pay the £12 if it means he disappears forever.0
-
Hartleypete said:So what’s happened.0
-
How is this fucking ferret still knocking about?
Him and Farnell need to take a long walk off a short pier. Chancers!6 -
This happened on the case today -
Order by Master Order - Order dated 25/3/25 sealed and sent to serving party by email
Don't know what it means, but will try to find out...
1 -
In relation to a court case, "Order by Master Order" typically means that a Master of the court (a judicial officer, often below the level of a judge) has issued an order that governs the case. This could be an administrative or procedural ruling rather than a substantive judgment.
Possible Meanings:
-
Procedural Direction – The Master has issued an order outlining how the case should proceed, such as deadlines, discovery procedures, or case management.
-
Case Management Decision – The Master has decided on preliminary matters before the case goes before a judge.
-
Final Order on Specific Issues – In some jurisdictions, Masters have authority to make binding decisions on certain matters, such as default judgments, cost awards, or minor disputes.
4 -
-
The man is a clueless gimp.0