Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton TV

11314151618

Comments

  • BalladMan
    BalladMan Posts: 1,146
    edited October 26
    It certainly is the EFL’s responsibility. Everything from all the games goes through their central studio in Osterley. The big apology board is the exception to that, it was obviously knocked up on the hoof as it became clear the problems were hard to fix.

    If you want compensation, ask the EFL for it, and while you are at it, ask them why we had TWO double aways in five games. 
    Why was there no problem with the Hull commentary?

    Our commentary team seem to have to been using new kit (as alluded to by Tel early in the match). It does beggar belief that you would not test this tech out BEFORE inconveniencing paying customers who are bringing in a few £1000 of revenue.  The most galling thing is the lack of follow up comms apologising or offering recompense. It’s not a free service, it’s actually going rate for a stream (film, gig, theatre streaming as comparison). 
  • jose
    jose Posts: 698
    When we couldn’t hear, somebody made sure we couldn’t see near side play as well.
    It might sound revolutionary, but shouldn’t everybody involved test out the whole system the day before, the morning before or in the hours before?
    It is times like yesterday I imagine idle people leaving things to the last minute whilst using the magic word ‘should’, as in ‘it should be all right’.
    Change that to ‘it will be all right’.
    Yesterday, when there actually was commentary in the second half it was depressing to hear defeatest Steve Brown going on about tiredness and fixture unfairness, when what I was watching the players the coaches and the manager not giving up and trying to find a way back…which they did.

  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,192
    It certainly is the EFL’s responsibility. Everything from all the games goes through their central studio in Osterley. The big apology board is the exception to that, it was obviously knocked up on the hoof as it became clear the problems were hard to fix.

    If you want compensation, ask the EFL for it, and while you are at it, ask them why we had TWO double aways in five games. 
    Why was there no problem with the Hull commentary?

    If there wasn’t, I suppose its because they can feed it out to their web directly, as we would at home. All the comms problems I can recall on Charlton TV have been at away matches. 
  • stevexreeve
    stevexreeve Posts: 1,399
    jose said:
    When we couldn’t hear, somebody made sure we couldn’t see near side play as well.
    It might sound revolutionary, but shouldn’t everybody involved test out the whole system the day before, the morning before or in the hours before?
    It is times like yesterday I imagine idle people leaving things to the last minute whilst using the magic word ‘should’, as in ‘it should be all right’.
    Change that to ‘it will be all right’.
    Yesterday, when there actually was commentary in the second half it was depressing to hear defeatest Steve Brown going on about tiredness and fixture unfairness, when what I was watching the players the coaches and the manager not giving up and trying to find a way back…which they did.

    I'm sure Charlton could do this but would the EFL pay to send cameras and the whole crew the day before every game. Maybe play a whole match just in case?

    You could do it in the hours before but what if it doesn't work. Just keep trying and warn people there's a problem.
  • BalladMan
    BalladMan Posts: 1,146
    jose said:
    When we couldn’t hear, somebody made sure we couldn’t see near side play as well.
    It might sound revolutionary, but shouldn’t everybody involved test out the whole system the day before, the morning before or in the hours before?
    It is times like yesterday I imagine idle people leaving things to the last minute whilst using the magic word ‘should’, as in ‘it should be all right’.
    Change that to ‘it will be all right’.
    Yesterday, when there actually was commentary in the second half it was depressing to hear defeatest Steve Brown going on about tiredness and fixture unfairness, when what I was watching the players the coaches and the manager not giving up and trying to find a way back…which they did.

    I'm sure Charlton could do this but would the EFL pay to send cameras and the whole crew the day before every game. Maybe play a whole match just in case?

    You could do it in the hours before but what if it doesn't work. Just keep trying and warn people there's a problem.
    Any outside broadcast worth its salt would have resiliency built in (additional and alternative kit). There are many times this is proven to not be the case on Charlton TV. 

    Again, I am not even that annoyed about the specific outages yesterday, just that the club is not owning it and apologising. 
  • Glovepup
    Glovepup Posts: 1,748
    It certainly is the EFL’s responsibility. Everything from all the games goes through their central studio in Osterley. The big apology board is the exception to that, it was obviously knocked up on the hoof as it became clear the problems were hard to fix.

    If you want compensation, ask the EFL for it, and while you are at it, ask them why we had TWO double aways in five games. 
    Why was there no problem with the Hull commentary?

    Different service apparently, that is what Greg said on comms. 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,732
    Don’t know about Hull but lots of clubs use the local BBC radio coverage 
  • Zulu
    Zulu Posts: 156
    Glovepup said:
    It certainly is the EFL’s responsibility. Everything from all the games goes through their central studio in Osterley. The big apology board is the exception to that, it was obviously knocked up on the hoof as it became clear the problems were hard to fix.

    If you want compensation, ask the EFL for it, and while you are at it, ask them why we had TWO double aways in five games. 
    Why was there no problem with the Hull commentary?

    Different service apparently, that is what Greg said on comms. 
    Glovepup said:
    It certainly is the EFL’s responsibility. Everything from all the games goes through their central studio in Osterley. The big apology board is the exception to that, it was obviously knocked up on the hoof as it became clear the problems were hard to fix.

    If you want compensation, ask the EFL for it, and while you are at it, ask them why we had TWO double aways in five games. 
    Why was there no problem with the Hull commentary?

    Different service apparently, that is what Greg said on comms. 
    Funny that they didnt tell us until after they took our money.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,192
    edited October 26
    BalladMan said:
    It certainly is the EFL’s responsibility. Everything from all the games goes through their central studio in Osterley. The big apology board is the exception to that, it was obviously knocked up on the hoof as it became clear the problems were hard to fix.

    If you want compensation, ask the EFL for it, and while you are at it, ask them why we had TWO double aways in five games. 
    Why was there no problem with the Hull commentary?

    Our commentary team seem to have to been using new kit (as alluded to by Tel early in the match). It does beggar belief that you would not test this tech out BEFORE inconveniencing paying customers who are bringing in a few £1000 of revenue.  The most galling thing is the lack of follow up comms apologising or offering recompense. It’s not a free service, it’s actually going rate for a stream (film, gig, theatre streaming as comparison). 
    Now I could be wrong here, but I remember that reference from Tel, but I understood him to mean they were trying something to get round the problem that had become apparent when they arrived at the stadium. Several times he also said that these problems are "completely outside our control". If the problems were caused by some new kit they themselves brought along, he wouldn't say that. As far as I know Tel (and I've only met him once years ago but i took to him straight away) the word "completely" is code for "we've been fucked over by the EFL/Sky, again"
  • BalladMan
    BalladMan Posts: 1,146
    BalladMan said:
    It certainly is the EFL’s responsibility. Everything from all the games goes through their central studio in Osterley. The big apology board is the exception to that, it was obviously knocked up on the hoof as it became clear the problems were hard to fix.

    If you want compensation, ask the EFL for it, and while you are at it, ask them why we had TWO double aways in five games. 
    Why was there no problem with the Hull commentary?

    Our commentary team seem to have to been using new kit (as alluded to by Tel early in the match). It does beggar belief that you would not test this tech out BEFORE inconveniencing paying customers who are bringing in a few £1000 of revenue.  The most galling thing is the lack of follow up comms apologising or offering recompense. It’s not a free service, it’s actually going rate for a stream (film, gig, theatre streaming as comparison). 
    Now I could be wrong here, but I remember that reference from Tel, but I understood him to mean they were trying something to get round the problem that had become apparent when they arrived at the stadium. Several times he also said that these problems are "completely outside our control". If the problems were caused by some new kit they themselves brought along, he wouldn't say that. As far as I know Tel (and I've only met him once years ago but i took to him straight away) the word "completely" is code for "we've been fucked over by the EFL/Sky, again"
    Fair enough. My point remains though, it should not be Tel making the apology, but the club making it right. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,572
    Live coverage of last weekend's fixture against Hull City on CharltonTV was interrupted by a number of audio drop-outs. The club's production team have been working with a number of external companies to ensure Saturday's game against Swansea City isn't impacted. The club would like to apologise to those impacted last weekend, and will be in touch with them to follow up with regards to partial and full refunds depending on their package.
    https://www.charltonafc.com/news/how-watch-swansea-city-clash




  • BalladMan
    BalladMan Posts: 1,146
    clive said:
    Live coverage of last weekend's fixture against Hull City on CharltonTV was interrupted by a number of audio drop-outs. The club's production team have been working with a number of external companies to ensure Saturday's game against Swansea City isn't impacted. The club would like to apologise to those impacted last weekend, and will be in touch with them to follow up with regards to partial and full refunds depending on their package.
    https://www.charltonafc.com/news/how-watch-swansea-city-clash




    At least they responded (in the end).  
  • Has anyone managed to buy a pass for tomorrow’s game ? Not giving me the option from ‘Belgium’.
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 11,000
    edited October 31
    sussexred said:
    Has anyone managed to buy a pass for tomorrow’s game ? Not giving me the option from ‘Belgium’.
    Can you pop over into Germany? That usually works.

  • stevexreeve
    stevexreeve Posts: 1,399
    BalladMan said:
    jose said:
    When we couldn’t hear, somebody made sure we couldn’t see near side play as well.
    It might sound revolutionary, but shouldn’t everybody involved test out the whole system the day before, the morning before or in the hours before?
    It is times like yesterday I imagine idle people leaving things to the last minute whilst using the magic word ‘should’, as in ‘it should be all right’.
    Change that to ‘it will be all right’.
    Yesterday, when there actually was commentary in the second half it was depressing to hear defeatest Steve Brown going on about tiredness and fixture unfairness, when what I was watching the players the coaches and the manager not giving up and trying to find a way back…which they did.

    I'm sure Charlton could do this but would the EFL pay to send cameras and the whole crew the day before every game. Maybe play a whole match just in case?

    You could do it in the hours before but what if it doesn't work. Just keep trying and warn people there's a problem.
    Any outside broadcast worth its salt would have resiliency built in (additional and alternative kit). There are many times this is proven to not be the case on Charlton TV. 

    Again, I am not even that annoyed about the specific outages yesterday, just that the club is not owning it and apologising. 
    Seem to remember SKY having all sorts of problems and drop outs a year ago when they started to improve their service!  Don't know whether SKY is worth it's salt. 

    "Salary comes from the word salt because the Romans used to pay their soldiers in salt". Or is that a completely made up load of bollocks?
  • Got the email from the club, said to email them, got refunded £5.00 5-10 minutes later.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,084
    What detail if any are you meant to reply with in the e mail?
    What's the purpose of e mailing them.
    They have the details so just make a refund.
  • Mendonca In Asdas
    Mendonca In Asdas Posts: 22,674
    edited October 31
    What detail if any are you meant to reply with in the e mail?
    What's the purpose of e mailing them.
    They have the details so just make a refund.
    I don’t make up the rules , maybe a faux pas, on their part, maybe should have been a full refund, but I’m not going to get 2 wound up about it, I was pretty fuming at the time though, when the match was on

    i just gave them name and address, just hope they really have sorted out the issues they were having, all seemed a bit amateurish and unprofessional really.
  • Solidgone
    Solidgone Posts: 10,232
    Got the email from the club, said to email them, got refunded £5.00 5-10 minutes later.
    Me too. 
  • Solidgone
    Solidgone Posts: 10,232
    sussexred said:
    Has anyone managed to buy a pass for tomorrow’s game ? Not giving me the option from ‘Belgium’.
    I’m in Barcelona but still had to pop over to Madrid via VPN to purchase the pass. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • BalladMan
    BalladMan Posts: 1,146
    Got the email from the club, said that to email them, got refunded £5.00 5-10 minutes later.
    Having worked for ‘redemption schemes’ on behalf of major brands in the past, this additional amount of effort (mail us back with some details) will result in 50%+ (likely 75%) potential claims never being made, especially when it relates to a smallish sum of money. 

    They could (and should) have just credited £10 to all the accounts that bought the stream in order to allow them to purchase an alternative.  Even if the £5 was auto added to account, it would have been a positive gesture. 
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,123
    £5 seems reasonable to me. Credit to the club on this.
  • Zulu
    Zulu Posts: 156
    Got the email from the club, said to email them, got refunded £5.00 5-10 minutes later.
    me too
  • I bought the stream but haven't got an e-mail from the club.

    Can someone tell me the address to e-mail for a refund, please. 
  • I bought the stream but haven't got an e-mail from the club.

    Can someone tell me the address to e-mail for a refund, please. 
    charltontv@streamamg.com
  • I bought the stream but haven't got an e-mail from the club.

    Can someone tell me the address to e-mail for a refund, please. 
    charltontv@streamamg.com
    Thanks. 
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,780
    Currently showing offline which is normal enough. I presume that is the same for everybody.
  • AndyG
    AndyG Posts: 5,944
    No fucking sound again !!!
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,669
    I haven’t and I bet I don’t seeing as I do audio only.

  • I'm genuinely in the US and it says unavailable, anyone know anything? Thanks!